A K L Reyners1, L de Munck2, F L G Erdkamp3, W M Smit4, K Hoekman5, R I Lalisang6, H de Graaf7, A N M Wymenga4, M Polee7, H Hollema8, M A T M van Vugt9, M Schaapveld10, P H B Willemse9. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen. Electronic address: a.k.l.reyners@umcg.nl. 2. Department of Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center The Netherlands, Utrecht. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Center, Sittard. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam. 6. Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center, Maastricht. 7. Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden. 8. Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen. 9. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen. 10. Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In ovarian cancer, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) overexpression is prognostic for poor survival. We investigated the efficacy of celecoxib (C), a selective COX-2 inhibitor, added to docetaxel (Taxotere)/carboplatin (DC) in advanced ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a phase II, randomized study, 400 mg celecoxib b.i.d. was added to first-line DC treatment (DCC). Celecoxib was to be continued after DC termination up to 3 years. Study end points were tolerability, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 151 of 196 eligible patients were diagnosed with stage IIIC/IV disease. Median follow-up for patients alive was 32.3 months. Celecoxib was used during a mean of 8.5 months. Twenty-three of 97 DCC patients stoppedcelecoxib prematurely, mainly due to skin reactions. Complete biochemical response was achieved in 51/78 DC patients (65%) versus 57/78 DCC patients (75%, not significant). In both study arms, median PFS was 14.3 months and median OS 34 months. COX-2 was expressed in 82% of 120 tumor samples retrospectively recovered. The PFS and OS of patients with intermediate/high COX-2 expression were similar to that in the other patients. CONCLUSION:Celecoxib did not influence PFS and OS, but interpretation of results is hampered by premature celecoxib discontinuation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In ovarian cancer, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) overexpression is prognostic for poor survival. We investigated the efficacy of celecoxib (C), a selective COX-2 inhibitor, added to docetaxel (Taxotere)/carboplatin (DC) in advanced ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a phase II, randomized study, 400 mg celecoxib b.i.d. was added to first-line DC treatment (DCC). Celecoxib was to be continued after DC termination up to 3 years. Study end points were tolerability, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 151 of 196 eligible patients were diagnosed with stage IIIC/IV disease. Median follow-up for patients alive was 32.3 months. Celecoxib was used during a mean of 8.5 months. Twenty-three of 97 DCCpatients stopped celecoxib prematurely, mainly due to skin reactions. Complete biochemical response was achieved in 51/78 DC patients (65%) versus 57/78 DCCpatients (75%, not significant). In both study arms, median PFS was 14.3 months and median OS 34 months. COX-2 was expressed in 82% of 120 tumor samples retrospectively recovered. The PFS and OS of patients with intermediate/high COX-2 expression were similar to that in the other patients. CONCLUSION:Celecoxib did not influence PFS and OS, but interpretation of results is hampered by premature celecoxib discontinuation.
Authors: Yuna Guo; S Ray Kenney; Carolyn Y Muller; Sarah Adams; Teresa Rutledge; Elsa Romero; Cristina Murray-Krezan; Rytis Prekeris; Larry A Sklar; Laurie G Hudson; Angela Wandinger-Ness Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2015-07-23 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Stephen John Ralph; Rhys Pritchard; Sara Rodríguez-Enríquez; Rafael Moreno-Sánchez; Raymond Keith Ralph Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2015-02-13
Authors: Suzanne C Dixon; Christina M Nagle; Nicolas Wentzensen; Britton Trabert; Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel; Joellen M Schildkraut; Kirsten B Moysich; Anna deFazio; Harvey A Risch; Mary Anne Rossing; Jennifer A Doherty; Kristine G Wicklund; Marc T Goodman; Francesmary Modugno; Roberta B Ness; Robert P Edwards; Allan Jensen; Susanne K Kjær; Estrid Høgdall; Andrew Berchuck; Daniel W Cramer; Kathryn L Terry; Elizabeth M Poole; Elisa V Bandera; Lisa E Paddock; Hoda Anton-Culver; Argyrios Ziogas; Usha Menon; Simon A Gayther; Susan J Ramus; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Anna H Wu; Malcolm C Pike; Penelope M Webb Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Alina Fedoseienko; Hylke W Wieringa; G Bea A Wisman; Evelien Duiker; Anna K L Reyners; Marten H Hofker; Ate G J van der Zee; Bart van de Sluis; Marcel A T M van Vugt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jocelyn Reader; Amy K Harper; Teklu Legesse; Paul N Staats; Olga Goloubeva; Gautam G Rao; Amy Fulton; Dana M Roque Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Anuj Suri; Xiugui Sheng; Kevin M Schuler; Yan Zhong; Xiaoyun Han; Hannah M Jones; Paola A Gehrig; Chunxiao Zhou; Victoria L Bae-Jump Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-06-28