Literature DB >> 22688617

Incidence of lumbar spine pedicle breach after percutaneous screw fixation: a radiographic evaluation of 601 screws in 151 patients.

Zachary A Smith1, Koichi Sugimoto, Cort D Lawton, Richard G Fessler.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective clinical study.
OBJECTIVES: Although percutaneous pedicle screw fixation continues to be increasingly practiced, there remain few reports specifically addressing the accuracy and clinical safety of this technique. The goal of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of fluoroscopically guided pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle breach rates vary substantially in the literature. Pedicle breach rates have been reported to be as high as 29% with the traditional, open technique. With the use of computer-assisted 2-dimensional fluoroscopy, breach rates have been reported between 5% and 23%. Furthermore, in a series of 225 pedicles instrumented with 3-dimensional fluoroscopy, the reported breach rate was 1.8%.
METHODS: A total of 151 patients were evaluated after instrumented single-level or 2-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with 601 screws placed for percutaneous fixation. The treated patients had an average age of 56.6 y (20-85 y) and there were 129 cases of single-level and 22 cases of 2-level. The levels of pedicle screw fixation included (level, patient numbers): L1/L2 (1), L2/L3 (2), L3/L4 (33), L4/L5 (101), L5/S1 (46). Radiographic results included postoperative computed tomographic scan. Patients were followed prospectively for potential clinical symptoms.
RESULTS: In a total of 601 instrumented pedicles, there were 37 pedicle breaches (6.2%). Of these, 22 (3.7%) were significant breaches (≥3 mm). The level of the breached pedicles were L3 (5/46, 10.2%), L4 (12/201, 7.0%), L5 (15/158, 9.5%), S1 (3/47, 3.4%). The side/location of breach was characterized as follows: medial (22), lateral (12), superior (2), and inferior (1). There were 2 symptomatic breaches, both associated with a medial breach at the L5 pedicle. Symptoms from these events were transient and did not require hardware repositioning. There were no other complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine continues to be a technique embraced by modern spinal surgeons. The use of intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance is both a clinically safe and accurate method for instrumentation and is of comparable accuracy to other techniques. Although trajectory errors may occur, they are of rare clinical significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 22688617     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826226cb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  23 in total

1.  A comparison of feasibility and safety of percutaneous fluoroscopic guided thoracic pedicle screws between Europeans and Asians: is there any difference?

Authors:  Mun Keong Kwan; Chee Kidd Chiu; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Reza Zamani; Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw accuracy with a mini-open approach: a tomographic evaluation of 470 screws in 125 patients.

Authors:  José Antonio Soriano-Sánchez; Luis Alberto Ortega-Porcayo; Carlos Francisco Gutiérrez-Partida; Luis Rodolfo Ramírez-Barrios; Ramses Uriel Ortíz-Leyva; Manuel Rodríguez-García; Oscar Sánchez-Escandón
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-10-23

Review 3.  The evolution of image-guided lumbosacral spine surgery.

Authors:  Austin C Bourgeois; Austin R Faulkner; Alexander S Pasciak; Yong C Bradley
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-04

Review 4.  Techniques and accuracy of thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Varun Puvanesarajah; Jason A Liauw; Sheng-Fu Lo; Ioan A Lina; Timothy F Witham
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-04-18

5.  S2-AI screw placement with the aide of electronic conductivity device monitoring: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Faheem A Sandhu; Jason E McGowan; Daniel R Felbaum; Hasan R Syed; Kyle B Mueller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Percutaneous screw placement in the lumbar spine with a modified guidance technique based on 3D CT navigation system.

Authors:  Ioannis D Siasios; John Pollina; Asham Khan; Vassilios George Dimopoulos
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

7.  Toward real-time rigid registration of intra-operative ultrasound with preoperative CT images for lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Authors:  Houssem-Eddine Gueziri; Simon Drouin; Charles X B Yan; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Digital Transformation Will Change Medical Education and Rehabilitation in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Tadatsugu Morimoto; Hirohito Hirata; Masaya Ueno; Norio Fukumori; Tatsuya Sakai; Maki Sugimoto; Takaomi Kobayashi; Masatsugu Tsukamoto; Tomohito Yoshihara; Yu Toda; Yasutomo Oda; Koji Otani; Masaaki Mawatari
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 2.948

9.  Minimally Invasive, Stereotactic, Wireless, Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbar Spine: Accuracy Rates With 182 Consecutive Screws.

Authors:  Saeed S Sadrameli; Ryan Jafrani; Blake N Staub; Majdi Radaideh; Paul J Holman
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12-21

10.  Application of Spinal Robotic Navigation Technology to Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Treatment of Spinal Fractures: A Clinical, Non-Randomized, Controlled Study.

Authors:  Bin Shi; Tianyu Jiang; Hailong Du; Wei Zhang; Lei Hu; Lihai Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.