Literature DB >> 22688144

Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration of lymph nodes and solid masses: factors influencing the cellularity and adequacy of the aspirate.

Eric Wee1, Sandeep Lakhtakia, Rajesh Gupta, Anuradha Sekaran, Rakesh Kalapala, Amitabh Monga, Saravanan Arjunan, Duvvuru Nageshwar Reddy.   

Abstract

GOALS: To study the factors that influence the cellularity and adequacy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA).
BACKGROUND: An on-site cytopathology service is preferred during EUS-guided FNA. However, this is not always available. Factors that influence the aspirate cellularity and adequacy have not been well defined in the absence of on-site cytopathology. STUDY: EUS-guided FNA procedures without an on-site cytopathologist from a single center were retrospectively studied. FNA of solid masses and lymph nodes (LN) were included. The FNA cellularity, hemorrhagic content, and endoscopists' assessment of adequacy were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 166 patients from January 2009 to October 2010 were included. A total of 520 FNA passes were performed. Of the 166 lesions, 70 (42.2%) were solid masses and 96 (57.8%) were LNs. A 22-G needle was used in 72.3% and 25 G in 27.7% of the patients. The median (range) number of FNA passes was 3 (1 to 7) for LNs and 3 (1 to 5) for solid masses. With this, the endoscopists had an accuracy of 92.2% (153/166) for obtaining an adequate aspirate. Of the 166 samples, 4 (2.4%) were acellular, 20 (12.0%) sparsely cellular, 52 (31.4%) moderately cellular, and 90 (54.2%) highly cellular. The 25-G needle had significantly more adequate aspirates than the 22-G needle for solid masses (P=0.011). Also, increasing passes correlated with higher cellularity (P=0.002) and an adequate aspirate (P=0.021). No correlation was found for LN FNA. Lesion size did not influence the cellularity or adequacy (P>0.05). The degree of hemorrhage was not influenced by the needle gauge, number of passes, or lesion size. The diagnostic yield was not affected by hemorrhage in the sample (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided FNA obtains a high proportion of adequate aspirates for LNs and solid masses, even without an on-site cytopathologist. Small proportions of inadequate samples still occur. For solid masses, a 25-G needle with at least 3 passes is more likely to provide an adequate aspirate than a 22-G needle and fewer passes. Hemorrhage did not affect the cytopathology's ability to make a diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22688144     DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31824432cb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  8 in total

Review 1.  How to measure quality in endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Antonio Facciorusso; Rosario Vincenzo Buccino; Nicola Muscatiello
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle tissue acquisition: where we stand in 2013?

Authors:  Zeid Karadsheh; Mohammad Al-Haddad
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Daniel Mullady; Dayna S Early; Amit Rastogi; Brian Collins; Jeff F Wang; Carrie Marshall; Sharon B Sams; Roy Yen; Mona Rizeq; Maria Romanas; Ozlem Ulusarac; Brian Brauer; Augustin Attwell; Srinivas Gaddam; Thomas G Hollander; Lindsay Hosford; Sydney Johnson; Vladimir Kushnir; Stuart K Amateau; Cara Kohlmeier; Riad R Azar; John Vargo; Norio Fukami; Raj J Shah; Ananya Das; Steven A Edmundowicz
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions with 22 versus 25 Gauge needles: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Facciorusso; Elisa Stasi; Marianna Di Maso; Gaetano Serviddio; Mohammed Salah Ali Hussein; Nicola Muscatiello
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 5.  Diagnostic Endoscopic Ultrasound: Technique, Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Tiing Leong Ang; Andrew Boon Eu Kwek; Lai Mun Wang
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 4.519

Review 6.  How good is fine needle aspiration? What results should you expect?

Authors:  Pierre Eisendrath; Mostafa Ibrahim
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 7.  Basic technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for solid lesions: How many passes?

Authors:  Maria Chiara Petrone; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.628

8.  Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Versus Fine-Needle Capillary Sampling in Evaluation of Lymph Node Metastasis of Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Shujun Xia; Yilai Chen; Weiwei Zhan; Wei Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.