Literature DB >> 22687184

Standardized reporting guidelines for emergency department syncope risk-stratification research.

Benjamin C Sun1, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Jeffrey Dela Cruz.   

Abstract

There is increasing research interest in the risk stratification of emergency department (ED) syncope patients. A major barrier to comparing and synthesizing existing research is wide variation in the conduct and reporting of studies. The authors wanted to create standardized reporting guidelines for ED syncope risk-stratification research using an expert consensus process. In that pursuit, a panel of syncope researchers was convened and a literature review was performed to identify candidate reporting guideline elements. Candidate elements were grouped into four sections: eligibility criteria, outcomes, electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, and predictors. A two-round, modified Delphi consensus process was conducted using an Internet-based survey application. In the first round, candidate elements were rated on a five-point Likert scale. In the second round, panelists rerated items after receiving information about group ratings from the first round. Items that were rated by >80% of the panelists at the two highest levels of the Likert scale were included in the final guidelines. There were 24 panelists from eight countries who represented five clinical specialties. The panel identified an initial set of 183 candidate elements. After two survey rounds, the final reporting guidelines included 92 items that achieved >80% consensus. These included 10 items for study eligibility, 23 items for outcomes, nine items for ECG abnormalities, and 50 items for candidate predictors. Adherence to these guidelines should facilitate comparison of future research in this area.
© 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22687184      PMCID: PMC3376009          DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01375.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  48 in total

1.  Syncope: is a diagnosis a diagnosis?

Authors:  David G Benditt; Michele Brignole
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes.

Authors:  James V Quinn; Ian G Stiell; Daniel A McDermott; Karen L Sellers; Michael A Kohn; George A Wells
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Diagnostic criteria for vasovagal syncope based on a quantitative history.

Authors:  Robert Sheldon; Sarah Rose; Stuart Connolly; Debbie Ritchie; Mary-Lou Koshman; Michael Frenneaux
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Initial evaluation of "syncope and collapse" the need for a risk stratification consensus.

Authors:  David G Benditt; Ilknur Can
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards.

Authors:  A Laupacis; N Sekar; I G Stiell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Risk stratification of patients with syncope.

Authors:  T P Martin; B H Hanusa; W N Kapoor
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Risk stratification of patients with syncope in an accident and emergency department.

Authors:  S D Crane
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Failure to validate the San Francisco Syncope Rule in an independent emergency department population.

Authors:  Adrienne Birnbaum; David Esses; Polly Bijur; Andrew Wollowitz; E John Gallagher
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Clinical predictors of electrophysiologic findings in patients with syncope of unknown origin.

Authors:  P Denes; E Uretz; M D Ezri; J Borbola
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-09

10.  Mental Health First Aid guidelines for helping a suicidal person: a Delphi consensus study in Japan.

Authors:  Erminia Colucci; Claire M Kelly; Harry Minas; Anthony F Jorm; Yuriko Suzuki
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2011-05-19
View more
  22 in total

1.  Standardized report template for indeterminate renal masses at CT and MRI: a collaborative product of the SAR Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew S Davenport; Eric M Hu; Andrew Zhang; Atul B Shinagare; Andrew D Smith; Ivan Pedrosa; Samuel D Kaffenberger; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-04

2.  Syncope confusion.

Authors:  Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Robert Sheldon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  ECG Predictors of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Older Adults With Syncope.

Authors:  Daniel K Nishijima; Amber L Lin; Robert E Weiss; Annick N Yagapen; Susan E Malveau; David H Adler; Aveh Bastani; Christopher W Baugh; Jeffrey M Caterino; Carol L Clark; Deborah B Diercks; Judd E Hollander; Bret A Nicks; Manish N Shah; Kirk A Stiffler; Alan B Storrow; Scott T Wilber; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  Outcomes in syncope research: it is time to standardize.

Authors:  Martin Huth Ruwald; Brian Olshansky
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  How did the simple faint get so complicated? Syncope in 2014.

Authors:  Satish R Raj
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.145

6.  Consensus development for healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Bory Kea; Benjamin Chih-An Sun
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 7.  How can we improve management of syncope in the Emergency Department?

Authors:  Marc A Probst; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 2.737

8.  Emergency department management of syncope: need for standardization and improved risk stratification.

Authors:  Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Monica Taljaard; Ian G Stiell; Marco L A Sivilotti; Heather Murray; Aparna Vaidyanathan; Brian H Rowe; Lisa A Calder; Eddy Lang; Andrew McRae; Robert Sheldon; George A Wells
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.397

9.  Syncope risk stratification in the ED: directions for future research.

Authors:  Benjamin Sun; Giorgio Costantino
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  Reliability of Clinical Assessments in Older Adults With Syncope or Near Syncope.

Authors:  Daniel K Nishijima; Amber L Laurie; Robert E Weiss; Annick N Yagapen; Susan E Malveau; David H Adler; Aveh Bastani; Christopher W Baugh; Jeffrey M Caterino; Carol L Clark; Deborah B Diercks; Judd E Hollander; Bret A Nicks; Manish N Shah; Kirk A Stiffler; Alan B Storrow; Scott T Wilber; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.