Literature DB >> 22685161

Pharmacodynamics of early, high-dose linezolid against vancomycin-resistant enterococci with elevated MICs and pre-existing genetic mutations.

Brian T Tsuji1, Jurgen B Bulitta, Tanya Brown, Alan Forrest, Pamela A Kelchlin, Patty N Holden, Charles A Peloquin, Laura Skerlos, Debra Hanna.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have emerged as an important nosocomial pathogen in medical centres worldwide. This study evaluated the impact of front-loading of linezolid on bacterial killing and suppression of resistance against VRE strains with defined genetic mutations.
METHODS: Time-killing experiments over 48 h assessed the concentration effect relationship of linezolid against eight strains of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. A hollow fibre infection model (HFIM) simulated traditional and front-loaded human therapeutic linezolid regimens against VRE strains at 10(6) cfu/mL over 240 h. Translational modelling was performed using S-ADAPT and NONMEM.
RESULTS: Over 48 h in time-kill experiments, linezolid displayed bacteriostatic activity with >2 log(10) cfu/mL killing for all strains with an MIC of 4 and minimal activity against VRE with MICs of 16 and 64 mg/L. Against one strain with no resistant alleles (MIC 4 mg/L), 600 mg of linezolid every 12 h achieved maximal reductions of 0.96 log(10) cfu/mL over 240 h in the HFIM, whereas front-loaded 1200 mg of linezolid every 12 h ×10 doses or 2400 mg of linezolid every 12 h ×10 doses followed by 600 mg of linezolid every 12 h provided significantly improved killing with maximal reductions of 3.02 and 3.46 log(10) cfu/mL. Front-loaded regimens suppressed amplification of resistant subpopulations against VRE strains with no resistant alleles (MIC 4 mg/L) and postponed regrowth of resistant subpopulations against a VRE with 3.2 resistant alleles (MIC 4 mg/L). Modelling yielded excellent population fits (r = 0.934) and identified the number of sensitive alleles as a critical covariate.
CONCLUSIONS: Early, high-dose regimens of linezolid provided promising killing against selected susceptible strains and may be clinically beneficial if early bactericidal activity is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22685161     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dks201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  17 in total

Review 1.  The role of infection models and PK/PD modelling for optimising care of critically ill patients with severe infections.

Authors:  T Tängdén; V Ramos Martín; T W Felton; E I Nielsen; S Marchand; R J Brüggemann; J B Bulitta; M Bassetti; U Theuretzbacher; B T Tsuji; D W Wareham; L E Friberg; J J De Waele; V H Tam; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Two mechanisms of killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by tobramycin assessed at multiple inocula via mechanism-based modeling.

Authors:  Jürgen B Bulitta; Neang S Ly; Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Nicholin A Wanigaratne; Tony Velkov; Rajbharan Yadav; Antonio Oliver; Lisandra Martin; Beom Soo Shin; Alan Forrest; Brian T Tsuji
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  New colistin population pharmacokinetic data in critically ill patients suggesting an alternative loading dose rationale.

Authors:  N Grégoire; O Mimoz; B Mégarbane; E Comets; D Chatelier; S Lasocki; R Gauzit; D Balayn; P Gobin; S Marchand; W Couet
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Optimization of Synergistic Combination Regimens against Carbapenem- and Aminoglycoside-Resistant Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates via Mechanism-Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling.

Authors:  Rajbharan Yadav; Jürgen B Bulitta; Roger L Nation; Cornelia B Landersdorfer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Individualising Therapy to Minimize Bacterial Multidrug Resistance.

Authors:  A J Heffernan; F B Sime; J Lipman; J A Roberts
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Interaction of Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii during In Vitro β-Lactam Exposure.

Authors:  Nicholas M Smith; Alexa Ang; Fanny Tan; Katelyn Macias; Sarah James; Jasleen Sidhu; Justin R Lenhard
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Using machine learning to optimize antibiotic combinations: dosing strategies for meropenem and polymyxin B against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  N M Smith; J R Lenhard; K R Boissonneault; C B Landersdorfer; J B Bulitta; P N Holden; A Forrest; R L Nation; J Li; B T Tsuji
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  Resistance suppression by high-intensity, short-duration aminoglycoside exposure against hypermutable and non-hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Vanessa E Rees; Jürgen B Bulitta; Antonio Oliver; Brian T Tsuji; Craig R Rayner; Roger L Nation; Cornelia B Landersdorfer
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Quantifying subpopulation synergy for antibiotic combinations via mechanism-based modeling and a sequential dosing design.

Authors:  Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Neang S Ly; Hongmei Xu; Brian T Tsuji; Jürgen B Bulitta
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Clinical population pharmacokinetics and toxicodynamics of linezolid.

Authors:  Lauren M Boak; Craig R Rayner; M Lindsay Grayson; David L Paterson; Denis Spelman; Sharmila Khumra; Blair Capitano; Alan Forrest; Jian Li; Roger L Nation; Jurgen B Bulitta
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.