Literature DB >> 22685084

Mini-incision right hepatic lobectomy with or without laparoscopic assistance for living donor hepatectomy.

Shunji Nagai1, Lloyd Brown, Atsushi Yoshida, Dean Kim, Marwan Kazimi, Marwan S Abouljoud.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive procedures are considered to be safe and effective approaches to the management of surgical liver disease. However, this indication remains controversial for living donor hepatectomy. Between 2000 and 2011, living donor right hepatectomy (LDRH) was performed 58 times. Standard right hepatectomy was performed in 30 patients via a subcostal incision with a midline extension. Minimally invasive procedures began to be used for LDRH in 2008. A hybrid technique (hand-assisted laparoscopic liver mobilization and minilaparotomy for parenchymal dissection) was developed and used in 19 patients. In 2010, an upper midline incision (10 cm) without laparoscopic assistance for LDRH was innovated, and this technique was used in 9 patients. The perioperative factors were compared, and the indications for minimally invasive LDRH were investigated. The operative blood loss was significantly less for the patients undergoing a minimally invasive procedure versus the patients undergoing the standard procedure (212 versus 316 mL, P = 0.001), and the operative times were comparable. The length of the hospital stay was significantly shorter for the minimally invasive technique group (5.9 versus 7.8 days, P < 0.001). The complication rates were 23% and 25% for the standard technique and minimally invasive technique groups, respectively (P = 0.88). Patients undergoing minilaparotomy LDRH had a body mass index (24.0 kg/m(2)) similar to that of the hybrid technique patients (25.8 kg/m(2), P = 0.36), but the graft size was smaller (780 versus 948 mL, P = 0.22). In conclusion, minimally invasive LDRH can be performed without safety being impaired. LDRH with a 10-cm upper midline incision and without laparoscopic assistance may be appropriate for donors with a smaller body mass. Laparoscopic assistance can be added as needed for larger donors. This type of LDRH with a 10-cm incision is innovative and is recommended for experienced centers.
Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22685084     DOI: 10.1002/lt.23488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  13 in total

Review 1.  The liver hanging maneuver in laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rami Rhaiem; Tullio Piardi; Tarek Kellil; Audrey Cagniet; Mikael Chetboun; Reza Kianmanesh; Daniele Sommacale
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Pushing the frontiers of living donor right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Seong Hoon Kim; Seung Duk Lee; Young Kyu Kim; Sang-Jae Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted hybrid living donor hepatectomy: a comparison with the conventional open procedure.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kitajima; Toshimi Kaido; Taku Iida; Satoru Seo; Kojiro Taura; Yasuhiro Fujimoto; Kohei Ogawa; Etsuro Hatano; Hideaki Okajima; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic liver resection for living donation: where do we stand?

Authors:  François Cauchy; Lilian Schwarz; Olivier Scatton; Olivier Soubrane
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  A hybrid method of laparoscopic-assisted open liver resection through a short upper midline laparotomy can be applied for all types of hepatectomies.

Authors:  Akihiko Soyama; Mitsuhisa Takatsuki; Tomohiko Adachi; Amane Kitasato; Yasuhiro Torashima; Koji Natsuda; Takayuki Tanaka; Izumi Yamaguchi; Shiro Tanaka; Ayaka Kinoshita; Tamotsu Kuroki; Susumu Eguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Different techniques for harvesting grafts for living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui Li; Jun-Bin Zhang; Xiao-Long Chen; Lei Fan; Li Wang; Shi-Hui Li; Qiao-Lan Zheng; Xiao-Ming Wang; Yang Yang; Gui-Hua Chen; Gen-Shu Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Postoperative outcomes of purely laparoscopic donor hepatectomy compared to open living donor hepatectomy: a preliminary observational study.

Authors:  Yu Jeong Bang; Joo Hyun Jun; Mi Sook Gwak; Justin Sangwook Ko; Jong Man Kim; Gyu Seong Choi; Jae Won Joh; Gaab Soo Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 1.859

Review 8.  Evolution and revolution of laparoscopic liver resection in Japan.

Authors:  Hironori Kaneko; Yuichiro Otsuka; Yoshihisa Kubota; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

Review 9.  Minimally invasive donor hepatectomy, are we ready for prime time?

Authors:  Kin Pan Au; Kenneth Siu Ho Chok
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Usefulness and safety of midline incision for right-sided hepatectomy: Cohort study.

Authors:  Daisuke Takei; Shintaro Kuroda; Keiso Matsubara; Hiroaki Mashima; Masakazu Hashimoto; Tsuyoshi Kobayashi; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.