Literature DB >> 22684691

Multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of sacroplasty in patients with osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures or pathologic sacral lesions.

Keith Kortman1, Orlando Ortiz, Todd Miller, Allan Brook, Sean Tutton, John Mathis, Bassem Georgy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes and safety after CT-guided percutaneous sacroplasty in patients with painful sacral insufficiency fractures or pathologic sacral lesions.
METHODS: A retrospective multicenter analysis of consecutive patients undergoing CT-guided sacroplasty for painful sacral insufficiency fractures or sacral lesions was undertaken. The inclusion criteria consisted of severe sacral pain not responding to conservative medical management with imaging evidence of unilateral or bilateral sacral insufficiency fractures or lesions. Outcome measures included hospitalization status (inpatient or outpatient), pre-treatment and post-treatment visual analog scale (VAS) scores, analgesic use and complications. Patients were followed at approximately 1 month and for at least 1 year after their sacroplasty procedure.
RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-three patients were included in the study, 204 with painful sacral insufficiency fractures and 39 with symptomatic sacral lesions. The average pre-treatment VAS score of 9.2±1.1 was significantly improved after sacroplasty to 1.9±1.7 in patients with sacral insufficiency fractures (p<0.001). The average pre-treatment VAS score of 9.0±0.9 in patients with sacral lesions was significantly improved after sacroplasty to 2.6±2.4 (p<0.001). There were no major complications or procedure-related deaths. One patient who was treated for a sacral insufficiency fracture experienced radicular pain due to local extravasation of cement that subsequently required surgical decompression for symptomatic relief.
CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided percutaneous sacroplasty is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of painful sacral insufficiency fractures or lesions. It is associated with prompt and durable pain relief and should be considered as an effective treatment option in this patient population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; CT angiography; CT perfusion; MRI; Sacroplasty; aneurysm; angiography; angioplasty; complication; lumbosacral; malignant; metastatic; peripheral nerve; sacral insufficiency fracture; spinal nerve; spine; technique; thrombectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22684691     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  20 in total

1.  In-screw cement augmentation for iliosacral screw fixation in posterior ring pathologies with insufficient bone stock.

Authors:  M A König; S Hediger; J W Schmitt; T Jentzsch; K Sprengel; C M L Werner
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Outcome of long-axis percutaneous sacroplasty for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures with a radiofrequency-induced, high-viscosity bone cement.

Authors:  Katrin Eichler; Stephan Zangos; Martin G Mack; Ingo Marzi; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Comparison of the 18-month outcome after the treatment of osteoporotic insufficiency fractures by means of balloon sacroplasty (BSP) and radiofrequency sacroplasty (RFS) in comparison: a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  Reimer Andresen; Sebastian Radmer; Julian Ramin Andresen; Hans-Christof Schober
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Safety and effectiveness of sacroplasty: a large single-center experience.

Authors:  A C Gupta; R V Chandra; A J Yoo; T M Leslie-Mazwi; D L Bell; B P Mehta; T L Vanderboom; J D Rabinov; M Larvie; J A Hirsch
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  [Balloonsacroplasty: C-arm or CT controlled application? : Experience with 46 patients].

Authors:  A Prokop; R Andresen; M Chmielnicki
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  Percutaneous sacroplasty for the management of painful pathologic fracture in a multiple myeloma patient: Case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  A A Dmytriw; K Talla; R Smith
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2016-11-25

Review 7.  Sacral Insufficiency Fractures: a Review of Risk Factors, Clinical Presentation, and Management.

Authors:  Ivan Urits; Vwaire Orhurhu; Jessica Callan; Nishita V Maganty; Sara Pousti; Thomas Simopoulos; Cyrus Yazdi; Rachel J Kaye; Lauren K Eng; Alan D Kaye; Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Omar Viswanath
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2020-02-17

8.  Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous sacroplasty: a single-centre experience in 58 consecutive patients with tumours or osteoporotic insufficient fractures treated under fluoroscopic guidance.

Authors:  Licia Pacheco Pereira; Frédéric Clarençon; Evelyne Cormier; Michèle Rose; Beatrix Jean; Lise Le Jean; Jacques Chiras
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Radiofrequency ablation alone or in combination with cementoplasty for local control and pain palliation of sacral metastases: preliminary results in 11 patients.

Authors:  Thomas P Madaelil; Adam N Wallace; Jack W Jennings
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Safety and efficacy of percutaneous sacroplasty for treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bilal Mahmood; Jordan Pasternack; Afshin Razi; Ahmed Saleh
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.