Literature DB >> 22684098

GATE as a GEANT4-based Monte Carlo platform for the evaluation of proton pencil beam scanning treatment plans.

L Grevillot1, D Bertrand, F Dessy, N Freud, D Sarrut.   

Abstract

Active scanning delivery systems take full advantage of ion beams to best conform to the tumor and to spare surrounding healthy tissues; however, it is also a challenging technique for quality assurance. In this perspective, we upgraded the GATE/GEANT4 Monte Carlo platform in order to recalculate the treatment planning system (TPS) dose distributions for active scanning systems. A method that allows evaluating the TPS dose distributions with the GATE Monte Carlo platform has been developed and applied to the XiO TPS (Elekta), for the IBA proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) system. First, we evaluated the specificities of each dose engine. A dose-conversion scheme that allows one to convert dose to medium into dose to water was implemented within GATE. Specific test cases in homogeneous and heterogeneous configurations allowed for the estimation of the differences between the beam models implemented in XiO and GATE. Finally, dose distributions of a prostate treatment plan were compared. In homogeneous media, a satisfactory agreement was generally obtained between XiO and GATE. The maximum stopping power difference of 3% occurred in a human tissue of 0.9 g cm(-3) density and led to a significant range shift. Comparisons in heterogeneous configurations pointed out the limits of the TPS dose calculation accuracy and the superiority of Monte Carlo simulations. The necessity of computing dose to water in our Monte Carlo code for comparisons with TPSs is also presented. Finally, the new capabilities of the platform are applied to a prostate treatment plan and dose differences between both dose engines are analyzed in detail. This work presents a generic method to compare TPS dose distributions with the GATE Monte Carlo platform. It is noteworthy that GATE is also a convenient tool for imaging applications, therefore opening new research possibilities for the PBS modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22684098     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/13/4223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Technical Note: validation of a material assignment method for a retrospective study of carbon-ion radiotherapy using Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Weishan Chang; Yusuke Koba; Takuya Furuta; Shunsuke Yonai; Shintaro Hashimoto; Shinnosuke Matsumoto; Tatsuhiko Sato
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Monte Carlo Simulation of a 6 MV X-Ray Beam for Open and Wedge Radiation Fields, Using GATE Code.

Authors:  Mohammad-Taghi Bahreyni-Toosi; Shahrokh Nasseri; Mahdi Momennezhad; Fatemeh Hasanabadi; Hamid Gholamhosseinian
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2014-10

3.  A pencil beam algorithm for magnetic resonance image-guided proton therapy.

Authors:  Fatima Padilla-Cabal; Dietmar Georg; Hermann Fuchs
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Computer-assisted beam modeling for particle therapy.

Authors:  Hermann Fuchs; Alessio Elia; Andreas F Resch; Peter Kuess; Armin Lühr; Marie Vidal; Loïc Grevillot; Dietmar Georg
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy and Arc Therapy: Proof of Concept of a Winning Alliance.

Authors:  Ramon Ortiz; Ludovic De Marzi; Yolanda Prezado
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.

Authors:  Fatima Padilla-Cabal; Jose Alejandro Fragoso; Andreas Franz Resch; Dietmar Georg; Hermann Fuchs
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.071

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.