Literature DB >> 22683149

Impact of an educational intervention and insurance coverage on patients' preferences to transfer multiple embryos.

Daniel Griffin1, Lindsay Brown, Richard Feinn, Mary Casey Jacob, Victoria Scranton, James Egan, John Nulsen.   

Abstract

Multiple gestations resulting from IVF continue to be a major problem associated with maternal/neonatal morbidity and mortality including preterm labour/delivery, pre-eclampsia and post-partum haemorrhage. A prospective survey at a university IVF clinic evaluated the effect of education and insurance coverage on patients' preferences for single-embryo transfer (SET) versus double-embryo transfer (DET). Patients undergoing IVF treatment from September 2008 to October 2009 were included. The main outcome measure was patients' preference of SET versus DET. Patients were sent an educational handout describing maternal and fetal risks of twin gestation. A total of 163 patients (32.6% response rate) returned the pre- and post-education surveys regarding preferences for SET versus DET based on three different IVF insurance coverage scenarios (no coverage, two cycles covered and unlimited coverage). There were statistically significant differences in the preference for SET before and after education across all insurance scenarios (scenario 1, 42.0% versus 61.1%; scenario 2, 50.6% versus 71.0%; and scenario 3, 61.7% versus 79.6%; P<0.001 for all scenarios). Before education, patients preferred SET more in the unlimited coverage scenario (61.7%) versus no coverage (42.0%; P<0.001). An educational handout and increasing the amount of insurance coverage significantly increased a patient's preference for SET.
Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22683149     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  4 in total

1.  Reducing the number of fetuses in a pregnancy: providers' and patients' views of challenges.

Authors:  Robert L Klitzman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Access to Fertility Care in Geographically Underserved Populations, a Second Look.

Authors:  Tia Y Brodeur; Daniel Grow; Navid Esfandiari
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  The parent trap: desire for multifetal gestation among patients treated for infertility.

Authors:  Seth J Barishansky; Anne P Hutchinson; Angela K Lawson; Mary Ellen Pavone
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Deciding how many embryos to transfer: ongoing challenges and dilemmas.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2016-07-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.