Literature DB >> 22682437

Optimal selection of the spatial scan parameters for cluster detection: a simulation study.

Sérgio Henrique Rodrigues Ribeiro1, Marcelo Azevedo Costa.   

Abstract

Circular and elliptic spatial scan statistics requires the user to choose a maximum cluster size. A common value for this parameter is 50% of the underlying population. In addition to the detected primary cluster, the user may be interested in the analysis of significant secondary clusters. It can also be argued that if the true cluster is irregular, then choosing a small value for the maximum cluster size and evaluating significant secondary clusters may improve cluster detection and avoid the use of irregular cluster methods. This work explores the performance of the circular, elliptic and double scan statistics for different values of the maximum cluster size and different options for the analysis of secondary clusters. Empirical results show that for hot-spot clusters, the analysis of secondary clusters which are statistically significant do not improve the detection of the true unknown cluster, on average. There is evidence that a variable maximum cluster size improves performance. That is, the double scan statistic applies an early-stopping procedure which improves positive predictive values.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22682437     DOI: 10.1016/j.sste.2012.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-5845


  10 in total

1.  Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of Monkeypox in Democratic Republic of Congo, 2000-2015.

Authors:  Bien-Aimé Makasa Mandja; Alice Brembilla; Pascal Handschumacher; Didier Bompangue; Jean-Paul Gonzalez; Jean-Jacques Muyembe; Frédéric Mauny
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.464

2.  Cluster Detection Tests in Spatial Epidemiology: A Global Indicator for Performance Assessment.

Authors:  Aline Guttmann; Xinran Li; Fabien Feschet; Jean Gaudart; Jacques Demongeot; Jean-Yves Boire; Lemlih Ouchchane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Performance map of a cluster detection test using extended power.

Authors:  Aline Guttmann; Lemlih Ouchchane; Xinran Li; Isabelle Perthus; Jean Gaudart; Jacques Demongeot; Jean-Yves Boire
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.918

4.  Using Gini coefficient to determining optimal cluster reporting sizes for spatial scan statistics.

Authors:  Junhee Han; Li Zhu; Martin Kulldorff; Scott Hostovich; David G Stinchcomb; Zaria Tatalovich; Denise Riedel Lewis; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.918

5.  Evaluation of the Gini Coefficient in Spatial Scan Statistics for Detecting Irregularly Shaped Clusters.

Authors:  Jiyu Kim; Inkyung Jung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Optimizing the maximum reported cluster size in the spatial scan statistic for ordinal data.

Authors:  Sehwi Kim; Inkyung Jung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Reclaiming independence in spatial-clustering datasets: A series of data-driven spatial weights matrices.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Xiong Xiao; Jian Qian; Shiqi Chen; Fang Liao; Fei Yin; Tao Zhang; Xiaosong Li; Yue Ma
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Optimizing the maximum reported cluster size in the spatial scan statistic for survival data.

Authors:  Sujee Lee; Jisu Moon; Inkyung Jung
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.918

9.  Spatial heterogeneity of type I error for local cluster detection tests.

Authors:  Aline Guttmann; Xinran Li; Jean Gaudart; Yan Gérard; Jacques Demongeot; Jean-Yves Boire; Lemlih Ouchchane
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.918

10.  Selection of the Maximum Spatial Cluster Size of the Spatial Scan Statistic by Using the Maximum Clustering Set-Proportion Statistic.

Authors:  Yue Ma; Fei Yin; Tao Zhang; Xiaohua Andrew Zhou; Xiaosong Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.