Literature DB >> 22682125

Thromboprophylaxis in non-surgical cancer patients.

Alexander T Cohen1, Meredith M P Gurwith, Mark Dobromirski.   

Abstract

Acutely ill medical patients with cancer and cancer patients requiring non-surgical therapy are considered as non-surgical cancer patients and are at moderate to high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE): approximately 10-30% of these patients may develop asymptomatic or symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), and the latter is a leading contributor to deaths in hospital. Other medical conditions associated with a high risk of VTE include cardiac disease, respiratory disease, inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatological and infectious diseases. Pre-disposing risk factors in non-surgical cancer patients include a history of VTE, immobilisation, history of metastatic malignancy, complicating infections, increasing age, obesity hormonal or antiangiogenic therapies, thalidomide and lenalidomide therapy. Heparins, both unfractionated (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and fondaparinux have been shown to be effective agents in prevention of VTE in the medical setting with patients having a history of cancer. UFH and LMWH along with semuloparin also have a role in outpatients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. However, it has not yet been possible to demonstrate a significant effect on mortality rates in this population. UFH has a higher rate of bleeding complications than LMWH. Thromboprophylaxis has been shown to be effective in medical patients with cancer and may have an effect on cancer outcomes. Thromboprophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy remains controversial and requires further investigation. There is no evidence for the use of aspirin, warfarin or mechanical methods. We recommend either LMWH, or fondaparinux for the prevention of VTE in cancer patients with acute medical illnesses and UFH for those with significant severe renal impairment. For ambulatory cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy we recommend LMWH or semuloparin. These are safe and effective agents in the thromboprophylaxis of non-surgical cancer patients.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22682125     DOI: 10.1016/S0049-3848(12)70034-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  5 in total

1.  Venous thromboembolism prevention during asparaginase-based therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  H Sibai; J T Seki; T Q Wang; N Sakurai; E G Atenafu; K W L Yee; A C Schuh; V Gupta; M D Minden; A D Schimmer; J M Brandwein
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Angiogenic inhibitors for older patients with advanced colorectal cancer: does the age hold the stage?

Authors:  Giuseppe Aprile; Caterina Fontanella; Eufemia Stefania Lutrino; Laura Ferrari; Mariaelena Casagrande; Giovanni Gerardo Cardellino; Gerardo Rosati; Gianpiero Fasola
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Universal venous thromboembolism policy is effective but may not adequately protect hospitalized cancer patients with larger BMI.

Authors:  Anna Xu; Hassan Sibai; Eshetu G Atenafu; Kelsey Japs; Jack T Seki
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Fundamental Research in Oncology and Thrombosis 2 (FRONTLINE 2): A Follow-Up Survey.

Authors:  Ajay K Kakkar; Rupert Bauersachs; Anna Falanga; John Wong; Gloria Kayani; Alex Kahney; Rodney Hughes; Mark Levine
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-05-08

5.  Theme 3: Non-invasive management of (recurrent) venous thromboembolism (VTE) and post thrombotic syndrome (PTS).

Authors:  Arina J ten Cate-Hoek; Jeffrey I Weitz; David Gailani; Karina Meijer; Helen Philippou; Annemieke C Bouman; Y Whitney Cheung; Thijs E van Mens; Jose W Govers-Riemslag; Minka Vries; Suzanne Bleker; Jossi S Biedermann; S Carina M Stoof; Harry R Buller
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.944

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.