| Literature DB >> 22681856 |
Xiao-Wei Wang1, Shan Hu, Qi-Liang Mao-Ying, Qian Li, Chang-Jiang Yang, Hui Zhang, Wen-Li Mi, Gen-Cheng Wu, Yan-Qing Wang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The most frequent pain in patients with metastatic breast and prostate cancer is bone pain, which can be severe and difficult to treat. The mechanisms underlying this pain remain unclear. Here we investigated the role of c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway in the spinal cord in cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22681856 PMCID: PMC3407760 DOI: 10.1186/1756-6606-5-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Brain ISSN: 1756-6606 Impact factor: 4.041
Figure 1Time course of pJNK upregulation on the ipsilateral side of L4-L5 spinal cord after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells. (A-B) Representative Western blots of pJNK1/2 and GAPDH from one membrane. (C-D) Density of pJNK1/2 levels on the ipsilateral side of L4-L5 spinal cord. pJNK1/2 levels were normalized against GAPDH levels and expressed as fold increase, compared with naïve. (* p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA, Mean ± SEM n = 4)
Figure 2Intra-tibial inoculation of carcinoma cells induced persistent JNK activation on the ipsilateral side of L4-L5 spinal cord. (A-C) Time course of pJNK activation in ipsilateral side of L4-L5 spinal cord. (D) Quantitative measurement of pJNK-IR cells in the superficial dorsal horn (laminas I- III). (E-M) Double immunofluorescence of pJNK (green) with NeuN (red, E-G), CD11b (H-J) and GFAP (red, K-M) respectively. (N) Statistic analysis of pJNK1/2-IR cells co-expressed with NeuN, CD11b and GFAP. Scale bars: 50 μm. (G’, J’, M’) High magnification image of G, J and M. Scale bars: 50 μm. (** p < 0.01 vs Naive, one-way ANOVA, mean ± SEM, n = 4)
Figure 3The analgesic effect of JNK inhibitor SP600125 on the nociceptive response to mechanical stimulations.(A) The paw withdrawal thresholds of ipsilateral side were significiantly decreased from day 5 until day 16. (B) The effect was tested immediately after a single intrathecal injection of SP600125 on day 12 after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells. (C) The accumulative (therapeutic) effect was tested 12 h after intrathecal injection of SP600125 on days 10, 12 and 14 after the intra-tibial inoculation of carcinoma cells. (D) The accumulative (therapeutic) effect was tested 24 h after intrathecal injection of SP600125 on day 10 and 14 after the intra-tibial inoculation of carcinoma cells. (* p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01, compared to control, one-way ANOVA, Mean ± SEM n = 8)