Literature DB >> 22681427

Attitudes and decision making among women seeking abortions at one U.S. clinic.

Diana Greene Foster1, Heather Gould, Jessica Taylor, Tracy A Weitz.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Various restrictions on abortion have been imposed under the pretense that women may be uninformed, undecided or coerced in regard to their decision to terminate a pregnancy. Understanding whether certain women are at risk of low confidence in their abortion decision is useful for providing client-centered care and allocating counseling time to women with the greatest needs.
METHODS: Data were abstracted from the precounseling needs assessment form and clinical intake form of 5,109 women who sought 5,387 abortions at one U.S. clinic in 2008. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze variables associated with women's high confidence in their abortion decision.
RESULTS: For 87% of the abortions sought, women had high confidence in their decision before receiving counseling. Certain variables were negatively associated with abortions' being sought by women with high confidence: being younger than 20, being black, not having a high school diploma, having a history of depression, having a fetus with an anomaly, having general difficulty making decisions, having spiritual concerns, believing that abortion is killing and fearing not being forgiven by God (odds ratios, 0.2-0.8). Having a supportive mother or male partner was associated with increased odds of high confidence (1.3 and 1.2, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Regulations requiring state-approved information or waiting periods may not meet the complex needs of all women. Instead, women may benefit more from interactions with trained staff who can assess and respond to their individual needs.
Copyright © 2012 by the Guttmacher Institute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22681427     DOI: 10.1363/4411712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health        ISSN: 1538-6341


  17 in total

1.  A Systematic Review of Reproductive Coercion in International Settings.

Authors:  Karen Trister Grace; Christina Fleming
Journal:  World Med Health Policy       Date:  2016-11-10

2.  Abortion Stigma Among Low-Income Women Obtaining Abortions in Western Pennsylvania: A Qualitative Assessment.

Authors:  Amanda Gelman; Elian A Rosenfeld; Cara Nikolajski; Lori R Freedman; Julia R Steinberg; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2016-12-16

3.  Reproductive Coercion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Karen Trister Grace; Jocelyn C Anderson
Journal:  Trauma Violence Abuse       Date:  2016-08-16

4.  Cohort Abortion Measures for the United States.

Authors:  Sarah K Cowan
Journal:  Popul Dev Rev       Date:  2013-06

Review 5.  The impact of mandatory waiting periods on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.

Authors:  Fiona de Londras; Amanda Cleeve; Maria I Rodriguez; Alana Farrell; Magdalena Furgalska; Antonella Lavelanet
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.135

6.  Structural Heteropatriarchy and Birth Outcomes in the United States.

Authors:  Bethany G Everett; Aubrey Limburg; Patricia Homan; Morgan M Philbin
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2022-02-01

7.  Attitudes toward abortion, social welfare programs, and gender roles in the U.S. and South Africa.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mosley; Barbara A Anderson; Lisa H Harris; Paul J Fleming; Amy J Schulz
Journal:  Crit Public Health       Date:  2019-04-19

8.  Factors Shaping Women's Pre-abortion Communication with Members of Their Social Network.

Authors:  Julie Chor; Megan Tusken; Danielle Young; Phoebe Lyman; Melissa Gilliam
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2019-04

9.  Secrets and Misperceptions: The Creation of Self-Fulfilling Illusions.

Authors:  Sarah K Cowan
Journal:  Sociol Sci       Date:  2014-11

10.  Role-players in abortion decision-making in the Accra Metropolis, Ghana.

Authors:  Akwasi Kumi-Kyereme; Fred Yao Gbagbo; Joshua Amo-Adjei
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.