Literature DB >> 22680348

Effects of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation and swirling motion on airborne Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Legionella pneumophila under various relative humidities.

C-W Chang1, S-Y Li, S-H Huang, C-K Huang, Y-Y Chen, C-C Chen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Legionella pneumophila have been detected in indoor air and linked to human infection. It is essential to adopt control methods to inactivate airborne pathogens. By passing bioaerosols horizontally into a UV device at two flow rates (Qs) and moving cells around a central UVC lamp at relative humidity (RH) of 12.7-16.7%, 58.7-59.6%, and 87.3-90%, the effects of swirling motion and 254-nm ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) against bioaerosols were assessed under UV-off and UV-on settings, respectively. An inverse relationship between RH and UVGI effectiveness was observed for every test bioaerosol (r = -0.74 ∼ -0.81, P < 0.0001). Increased UV resistance with RH is likely associated with the hygroscopicity of bioaerosols, evident by increased aerodynamic diameters at high RH (P < 0.05). UVGI effectiveness was significantly increased with decreasing Q (P < 0.0001). Moreover, P. aeruginosa was the most susceptible to UVGI, while the greatest UV resistance occurred in L. pneumophila at low RH and S. aureus at medium and high RH (P < 0.05). Results of UV off show P. aeruginosa and L. pneumophila were more sensitive to air-swirling motion than S. aureus (P < 0.05). Overall, test bioaerosols were reduced by 1.7-4.9 and 0.2-1.7 log units because of the UVGI and swirling movement, respectively. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The studied UV device, with a combination of swirling motion and UVGI, is effective to inactivate airborne S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and L. pneumophila. This study also explores the factors governing the UVGI and swirling motion against infectious bioaerosols. With understanding the environmental and operational parameters, the studied UV device has the potential to be installed indoors where people are simultaneously present, for example, hospital wards and nursing homes, to prevent the humans from acquiring infectious diseases.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22680348     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2012.00793.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  7 in total

1.  UVC LED Irradiation Effectively Inactivates Aerosolized Viruses, Bacteria, and Fungi in a Chamber-Type Air Disinfection System.

Authors:  Do-Kyun Kim; Dong-Hyun Kang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  3a edizione Giornate della ricerca scientifica e delle esperienze professionali dei giovani: Società Italiana di Igiene, Medicina Preventiva e Sanità Pubblica (SItI) 25-26 marzo 2022.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2022-07-06

3.  In-duct grating-like dielectric barrier discharge system for air disinfection.

Authors:  Liyang Zhang; Yuntao Guo; Xuanyu Chang; Zenghui Yao; Xiaodong Wei; Zihao Feng; Dongheyu Zhang; Qun Zhou; Xinxin Wang; Haiyun Luo
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 14.224

4.  Ten Questions Concerning the Aerosolization and Transmission of Legionella in the Built Environment.

Authors:  Aaron J Prussin; David Otto Schwake; Linsey C Marr
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 6.456

5.  Impact of UVC-sustained recirculating air filtration on airborne bacteria and dust in a pig facility.

Authors:  Lisa Eisenlöffel; Tobias Reutter; Matthias Horn; Simon Schlegel; Uwe Truyen; Stephanie Speck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens.

Authors:  Thi Tham Nguyen; Graham R Johnson; Scott C Bell; Luke D Knibbs
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  The microbiome of the built environment and mental health.

Authors:  Andrew J Hoisington; Lisa A Brenner; Kerry A Kinney; Teodor T Postolache; Christopher A Lowry
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 14.650

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.