Literature DB >> 22678831

Acceptability of Intanza® 15 μg intradermal influenza vaccine in Belgium during the 2010-2011 influenza season.

Patrick A Dhont1, Adelin Albert, Patrick Brenders, Anna Podwapinska, Ann Pollet, Dirk Scheveneels, François Tihon, Ilse Verheyden, Jan Victor, Sandrine I Samson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Intradermal (ID) influenza vaccination induces an enhanced immune response in the elderly when compared with intramuscular (IM) vaccination. In 2009, an ID seasonal influenza vaccine (Intanza(®) [Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Lyon, France] 15 μg) was approved for use in individuals aged ≥ 60 years in Europe. This survey conducted in Belgium was the first in Europe to assess the acceptability of this vaccine in routine clinical practice by vaccinees and their general practitioners (GPs).
METHODS: GPs willing to use both the ID and IM influenza vaccines were selected during the 2010-2011 influenza season. Each GP recruited ≤ 10 patients aged ≥ 60 years who received the ID vaccine. Vaccinees and GPs completed questionnaires about their opinions on influenza vaccination and the acceptability of the ID influenza vaccine.
RESULTS: In total, 105 GPs and 837 vaccinees completed questionnaires. A high proportion of vaccinees (40.3%) was aged ≥ 75 years, and 95.5% had been vaccinated the previous year. The majority of vaccinees was very satisfied (70.0%) or satisfied (27.9%) with the ID vaccine. The main reasons for the high satisfaction rate were that the injection was not very painful, administration was quick, and the vaccinee felt confident about the micro-needle injection system. Most vaccinees (91.1%) who had previously received IM influenza vaccination preferred the ID vaccine, and 98.5% of vaccinees reported they would consider receiving the ID vaccine the following year. The majority of GPs was very satisfied (78.6%) or satisfied (18.4%) with the ID vaccine, and most GPs (87.6%) expressed a preference for the ID vaccine over IM influenza vaccine.
CONCLUSION: The ID influenza vaccine was well accepted by vaccinees and their GPs, who expressed a preference for the ID vaccine over conventional IM influenza vaccine. The availability of the ID influenza vaccine may help to improve uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination in the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22678831     DOI: 10.1007/s12325-012-0025-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Ther        ISSN: 0741-238X            Impact factor:   3.845


  8 in total

1.  Acceptance of intradermal inactivated influenza vaccines among hospital staff following 2 seasonal vaccination campaigns.

Authors:  Laura Goodliffe; Brenda L Coleman; Allison J McGeer
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Traditional and new influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Sook-San Wong; Richard J Webby
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Immunogenicity, safety and tolerability of intradermal influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Ivan F N Hung; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Immunogenicity of Standard-Dose Intramuscular Versus Intradermal Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex With Men in Bangkok, Thailand.

Authors:  Shikha Garg; Prasert Thongcharoen; Prabda Praphasiri; Anupong Chitwarakorn; Pornchai Sathirapanya; Stefan Fernandez; Kamonthip Rungrojcharoenkit; Wannee Chonwattana; Philip A Mock; Wichuda Sukwicha; Jacqueline M Katz; Marc-Alain Widdowson; Marcel E Curlin; Robert V Gibbons; Timothy H Holtz; Fatimah S Dawood; Sonja J Olsen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 5.  Fluzone® intra-dermal (Intanza®/Istivac® Intra-dermal): An updated overview.

Authors:  Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Andrea Orsi; Filippo Ansaldi; Roberto Gasparini; Giancarlo Icardi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Intradermal vaccination for infants and children.

Authors:  Akihiko Saitoh; Yuta Aizawa
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Development of a universal CTL-based vaccine for influenza.

Authors:  Diego Esteban Cargnelutti; María Victoria Sánchez; Nora Marta Mattion; Eduardo Alberto Scodeller
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.269

8.  Safety and tolerability of intradermal influenza vaccination in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Arintaya Phrommintikul; Wanwarang Wongcharoen; Srun Kuanprasert; Narawudt Prasertwitayakij; Rungsrit Kanjanavanit; Siriluck Gunaparn; Apichard Sukonthasarn
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.327

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.