Literature DB >> 22678817

Understanding entheses: bridging the gap between clinical and anthropological perspectives.

Stephen H Schlecht1.   

Abstract

An enthesis is the interface where tendon meets bone, providing both muscle anchorage and stress dissipation. Previous anthropological research suggests size and complexity of entheses observable in osteological material, are indicative of the strain magnitude resulting from repetitive muscle contractions during the performance of daily routines. These proposed "musculoskeletal stress markers" are routinely incorporated into bioarcheological studies as evidence of general activity patterns past human populations participated in. However, much of how this complex osteotendinous interface develops and responds to mechanical strains is poorly understood. The following review seeks to shed light on this structural enigma by synthesizing current findings in both the clinical and anthropological literature, in the interest of generating new conversations in how entheses respond to contractual forces and the systemic influences (i.e., genetics, hormones), that surround their morphological development. Only once we truly understand the etiology of tendon insertion sites, will the value of enthesial research in reconstructing human behavior be determined.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22678817     DOI: 10.1002/ar.22516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.064


  10 in total

1.  Enigmatic cranial superstructures among Chamorro ancestors from the Mariana Islands: gross anatomy and microanatomy.

Authors:  Gary M Heathcote; Timothy G Bromage; Vincent J Sava; Douglas B Hanson; Bruce E Anderson
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Enthesis as a target organ in rheumatic diseases: an expanding frontier.

Authors:  Gleb Slobodin; Itzhak Rosner
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  The mechanical hypothesis of septal aperture formation tested in an early medieval population from Ostrów Lednicki (Poland).

Authors:  Anna Myszka; Anna M Kubicka; Jacek Tomczyk
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Femoral entheseal shape and attachment angle as potential risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Callan M Luetkemeyer; Benjamin C Marchi; James A Ashton-Miller; Ellen M Arruda
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-08-30

Review 5.  Entheseal involvement in systemic disorders.

Authors:  Gleb Slobodin; Doron Rimar; Nina Boulman; Lisa Kaly; Michael Rozenbaum; Itzhak Rosner; Majed Odeh
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Quantitative comparison of the microscopic anatomy of the human ACL femoral and tibial entheses.

Authors:  Mélanie L Beaulieu; Grace E Carey; Stephen H Schlecht; Edward M Wojtys; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Locomotor activity influences muscle architecture and bone growth but not muscle attachment site morphology.

Authors:  Karyne N Rabey; David J Green; Andrea B Taylor; David R Begun; Brian G Richmond; Shannon C McFarlin
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.895

8.  On the heterogeneity of the femoral enthesis of the human ACL: microscopic anatomy and clinical implications.

Authors:  Mélanie L Beaulieu; Grace E Carey; Stephen H Schlecht; Edward M Wojtys; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2016-07-13

9.  Anatomy and histomorphology of the flexor digitorum profundus enthesis: functional implications for tissue engineering and surgery.

Authors:  Jeremy W Mortimer; Hamad Alsaykhan; Subashan Vadibeler; Philippa A Rust; Jennifer Z Paxton
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Morphology of muscle attachment sites in the modern human hand does not reflect muscle architecture.

Authors:  E M Williams-Hatala; K G Hatala; S Hiles; K N Rabey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.