Literature DB >> 22678595

ACCF/SCAI/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2012 appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization: American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions American Association for Thoracic Surgery American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Heart Failure Society of America Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Manesh R Patel1, Steven R Bailey, Robert O Bonow, Charles E Chambers, Paul S Chan, Gregory J Dehmer, Ajay J Kirtane, L Samuel Wann, R Parker Ward, Pamela S Douglas, Manesh R Patel1, Steven R Bailey, Philip Altus, Denise D Barnard, James C Blankenship, Donald E Casey, Larry S Dean, Reza Fazel, Ian C Gilchrist, Clifford J Kavinsky, Susan G Lakoski, D Elizabeth Le, John R Lesser, Glenn N Levine, Roxana Mehran, Andrea M Russo, Matthew J Sorrentino, Mathew R Williams, John B Wong, Michael J Wolk, Steven R Bailey, Pamela S Douglas, Robert C Hendel, Christopher M Kramer, James K Min, Manesh R Patel1, Leslee Shaw, Raymond F Stainback, Joseph M Allen.   

Abstract

The American College of Cardiology Foundation, in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted a review of common clinical scenarios where diagnostic catheterization is frequently considered. The indications (clinical scenarios) were derived from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines and results of studies examining the implementation of noninvasive imaging appropriate use criteria. The 166 indications in this document were developed by a diverse writing group and scored by a separate independent technical panel on a scale of 1 to 9, to designate appropriate use (median 7 to 9), uncertain use (median 4 to 6), and inappropriate use (median 1 to 3). Diagnostic catheterization may include several different procedure components. The indications developed focused primarily on 2 aspects of diagnostic catheterization. Many indications focused on the performance of coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease with other procedure components (e.g., hemodynamic measurements, ventriculography) at the discretion of the operator. The majority of the remaining indications focused on hemodynamic measurements to evaluate valvular heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, cardiomyopathy, and other conditions, with the use of coronary angiography at the discretion of the operator. Seventy-five indications were rated as appropriate, 49 were rated as uncertain, and 42 were rated as inappropriate. The appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization have the potential to impact physician decision making, healthcare delivery, and reimbursement policy. Furthermore, recognition of uncertain clinical scenarios facilitates identification of areas that would benefit from future research. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22678595     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  3 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac CT for myocardial ischaemia detection and characterization--comparative analysis.

Authors:  A M Bucher; C N De Cecco; U J Schoepf; R Wang; F G Meinel; S R Binukrishnan; J V Spearman; T J Vogl; B Ruzsics
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Collaborative quality improvement vs public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention: A comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention in New York vs Michigan.

Authors:  Thomas F Boyden; Karen E Joynt; Lisa McCoy; Megan L Neely; Matthew A Cavender; Simon Dixon; Frederick A Masoudi; Eric Peterson; Sunil V Rao; Hitinder S Gurm
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Discrepancy between clinician and research assistant in TIMI score calculation (TRIAGED CPU).

Authors:  Brian T Taylor; Michelino Mancini
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.