Literature DB >> 22678355

An evaluation of hardware and surgical complications with deep brain stimulation based on diagnosis and lead location.

Steven Falowski1, Yinn Cher Ooi, Adam Smith, Leonard Verhargen Metman, Roy A E Bakay.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation is the most frequently performed neurosurgical procedure for movement disorders. This procedure is well tolerated, but not free of complications. Analysis of hardware complications based on patient diagnosis and lead location could prove valuable in recognizing potential pitfalls and patients at higher risk.
METHODS: This review analyzes the most common surgery-related complications that may occur based on diagnosis and lead location. Patients were categorized based on diagnosis - Parkinson's disease (PD), dystonia, and essential tremor (ET) - as well as by lead location - subthalamic nucleus (STN), globus pallidus interna (GPi), and ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim). It is a retrospective review of 326 patients undergoing 949 procedures over a 10-year period by one surgeon. Fisher's exact test and χ(2) test were employed and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the significant variables of correlation.
RESULTS: Overall lead revision was observed at 5.7%, but was observed at 11.9% of GPi lead placements, and 10.7% of dystonia patients with only 4.6% of STN lead placements. Total extension revision was at 2.5%, but observed at 5.3% for dystonia patients and at only 1.4% for ET patients. Overall infection rate was at 1.9% with the highest rate observed in dystonia and ET patients. Postoperative complications with hardware, erosion, infection, and delayed stimulation failure were observed more often with ET and dystonia than with PD. This difference was statistically significant between dystonia and PD (p < 0.03) but not between the other disease entities (p > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, age and gender had no correlation with these complications. PD had significantly fewer complications on forward selection regression analysis (p = 0.004). Asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was at 2.5% with the majority in Vim and none observed in GPi placements. There was only one symptomatic hemorrhage with a permanent deficit. Infarcts were observed at 0.8%. There were no mortalities.
CONCLUSION: This large series of patients and long-term follow-up demonstrate that risks of complications are not universal among movement disorder patients. Diagnosis and lead location are important risk stratification factors in determining complications.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22678355     DOI: 10.1159/000338254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg        ISSN: 1011-6125            Impact factor:   1.875


  11 in total

1.  Impact of advancing age on post-operative complications of deep brain stimulation surgery for essential tremor.

Authors:  Terence Verla; Andrew Marky; Harrison Farber; Frank W Petraglia; John Gallis; Yuliya Lokhnygina; Beth Parente; Patrick Hickey; Dennis A Turner; Shivanand P Lad
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 2.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Steven M Falowski
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2015-07

3.  Bilateral thermal capsulotomy with MR-guided focused ultrasound for patients with treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  H H Jung; S J Kim; D Roh; J G Chang; W S Chang; E J Kweon; C-H Kim; J W Chang
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 15.992

4.  [Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: timing and patient selection].

Authors:  R Erasmi; G Deuschl; K Witt
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 5.  Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders.

Authors:  Paul S Larson
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

6.  Surgical site infections after deep brain stimulation surgery: frequency, characteristics and management in a 10-year period.

Authors:  Silje Bjerknes; Inger Marie Skogseid; Terje Sæhle; Espen Dietrichs; Mathias Toft
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of Bilateral vs. Staged Unilateral Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's Disease in Patients Under 70 Years of Age.

Authors:  Frank W Petraglia; S Harrison Farber; Jing L Han; Terence Verla; John Gallis; Yuliya Lokhnygina; Beth Parente; Patrick Hickey; Dennis A Turner; Shivanand P Lad
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2015-11-16

8.  Chronological Changes of C-Reactive Protein Levels Following Uncomplicated, Two-Staged, Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Jae-Hun Kim; Sang-Woo Ha; Jin-Gyu Choi; Byung-Chul Son
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-10-30

9.  Postoperative lead migration in deep brain stimulation surgery: Incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact.

Authors:  Takashi Morishita; Justin D Hilliard; Michael S Okun; Dan Neal; Kelsey A Nestor; David Peace; Alden A Hozouri; Mark R Davidson; Francis J Bova; Justin M Sporrer; Genko Oyama; Kelly D Foote
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Towards unambiguous reporting of complications related to deep brain stimulation surgery: A retrospective single-center analysis and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Katja Engel; Torge Huckhagel; Alessandro Gulberti; Monika Pötter-Nerger; Eik Vettorazzi; Ute Hidding; Chi-Un Choe; Simone Zittel; Hanna Braaß; Peter Ludewig; Miriam Schaper; Kara Krajewski; Christian Oehlwein; Katrin Mittmann; Andreas K Engel; Christian Gerloff; Manfred Westphal; Christian K E Moll; Carsten Buhmann; Johannes A Köppen; Wolfgang Hamel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.