Literature DB >> 22678170

Perioperative results of robotic lung lobectomy: summary of the literature.

Hisato Takagi, Hirotaka Yamamoto, Shin-nosuke Goto, Masafumi Matsui, Takuya Umemoto.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22678170     DOI： 10.1007/s00464-012-2292-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN： 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Robot-assisted lung resection: outcomes and technical details.

Authors:  Pier C Giulianotti; Nicolas C Buchs; Giuseppe Caravaglios; Francesco M Bianco
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-07-15

2.  Robotic assistance for video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: technique and initial results.

Authors:  Bernard J Park; Raja M Flores; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Tristan D Yan; Deborah Black; Paul G Bannon; Brian C McCaughan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Four-arm robotic lobectomy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Giulia Veronesi; Domenico Galetta; Patrick Maisonneuve; Franca Melfi; Ralph Alexander Schmid; Alessandro Borri; Fernando Vannucci; Lorenzo Spaggiari
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Total port-access robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy without utility thoracotomy.

Authors:  Mathew Ninan; Mark R Dylewski
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Initial experience with robotic lung lobectomy: report of two different approaches.

Authors:  Florian Augustin; Johannes Bodner; Heinz Wykypiel; Christoph Schwinghammer; Thomas Schmid
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Robot-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Farid Gharagozloo; Marc Margolis; Barbara Tempesta; Eric Strother; Farzad Najam
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Farid Gharagozloo; Marc Margolis; Barbara Tempesta
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.330
  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Developing a robotic program in thoracic surgery at Cape Cod Hospital.

Authors:  Jeffrey Spillane; Paula Brooks
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-02-26

2.  Surgical outcomes associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy: retrospective review of 208 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Emily P Ng; Frank O Velez-Cubian; Kathryn L Rodriguez; Matthew R Thau; Carla C Moodie; Joseph R Garrett; Jacques P Fontaine; Eric M Toloza
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Efficacy of lymph node dissection during robotic-assisted lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: retrospective review of 159 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Frank O Velez-Cubian; Kathryn L Rodriguez; Matthew R Thau; Carla C Moodie; Joseph R Garrett; Jacques P Fontaine; Eric M Toloza
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Effect of small body habitus on peri-operative outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy: retrospective analysis of 208 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Frank O Velez-Cubian; Wei-Wei Zhang; Kathryn L Rodriguez; Matthew R Thau; Emily P Ng; Carla C Moodie; Joseph R Garrett; Jacques-Pierre Fontaine; Eric M Toloza
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Analysis of lymph node impact on conversion of complete thoracoscopic lobectomy to open thoracotomy.

Authors:  Yun Li; Jun Wang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.500
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.