OBJECTIVE: Hospital length of stay (LOS) is important to administrators and families of neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). A prediction model for NICU LOS was developed using predictors birth weight, gestational age and two severity of illness tools, the score for neonatal acute physiology, perinatal extension (SNAPPE) and the morbidity assessment index for newborns (MAIN). STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive admissions (n=293) to a New England regional level III NICU were retrospectively collected. Multiple predictive models were compared for complexity and goodness-of-fit, coefficient of determination (R (2)) and predictive error. The optimal model was validated prospectively with consecutive admissions (n=615). Observed and expected LOS was compared. RESULT: The MAIN models had best Akaike's information criterion, highest R (2) (0.786) and lowest predictive error. The best SNAPPE model underestimated LOS, with substantial variability, yet was fairly well calibrated by birthweight category. LOS was longer in the prospective cohort than the retrospective cohort, without differences in birth weight, gestational age, MAIN or SNAPPE. CONCLUSION: LOS prediction is improved by accounting for severity of illness in the first week of life, beyond factors known at birth. Prospective validation of both MAIN and SNAPPE models is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: Hospital length of stay (LOS) is important to administrators and families of neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). A prediction model for NICU LOS was developed using predictors birth weight, gestational age and two severity of illness tools, the score for neonatal acute physiology, perinatal extension (SNAPPE) and the morbidity assessment index for newborns (MAIN). STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive admissions (n=293) to a New England regional level III NICU were retrospectively collected. Multiple predictive models were compared for complexity and goodness-of-fit, coefficient of determination (R (2)) and predictive error. The optimal model was validated prospectively with consecutive admissions (n=615). Observed and expected LOS was compared. RESULT: The MAIN models had best Akaike's information criterion, highest R (2) (0.786) and lowest predictive error. The best SNAPPE model underestimated LOS, with substantial variability, yet was fairly well calibrated by birthweight category. LOS was longer in the prospective cohort than the retrospective cohort, without differences in birth weight, gestational age, MAIN or SNAPPE. CONCLUSION: LOS prediction is improved by accounting for severity of illness in the first week of life, beyond factors known at birth. Prospective validation of both MAIN and SNAPPE models is warranted.
Authors: Sarah E Seaton; Lisa Barker; David Jenkins; Elizabeth S Draper; Keith R Abrams; Bradley N Manktelow Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sarah E Seaton; Lisa Barker; Elizabeth S Draper; Keith R Abrams; Neena Modi; Bradley N Manktelow Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Peter J Fleming; Jennifer Ingram; Debbie Johnson; Peter S Blair Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: Rolf F Maier; Béatrice Blondel; Aurélie Piedvache; Bjoern Misselwitz; Stavros Petrou; Patrick Van Reempts; Francesco Franco; Henrique Barros; Janusz Gadzinowski; Klaus Boerch; Arno van Heijst; Elizabeth S Draper; Jennifer Zeitlin Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Sarah E Seaton; Lisa Barker; Elizabeth S Draper; Keith R Abrams; Neena Modi; Bradley N Manktelow Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 5.747