Literature DB >> 22678118

Global structure-activity relationship model for nonmutagenic carcinogens using virtual ligand-protein interactions as model descriptors.

Albert R Cunningham1, C Alex Carrasquer, Shahid Qamar, Jon M Maguire, Suzanne L Cunningham, John O Trent.   

Abstract

Structure-activity relationship (SAR) models are powerful tools to investigate the mechanisms of action of chemical carcinogens and to predict the potential carcinogenicity of untested compounds. We describe the use of a traditional fragment-based SAR approach along with a new virtual ligand-protein interaction-based approach for modeling of nonmutagenic carcinogens. The ligand-based SAR models used descriptors derived from computationally calculated ligand-binding affinities for learning set agents to 5495 proteins. Two learning sets were developed. One set was from the Carcinogenic Potency Database, where chemicals tested for rat carcinogenesis along with Salmonella mutagenicity data were provided. The second was from Malacarne et al. who developed a learning set of nonalerting compounds based on rodent cancer bioassay data and Ashby's structural alerts. When the rat cancer models were categorized based on mutagenicity, the traditional fragment model outperformed the ligand-based model. However, when the learning sets were composed solely of nonmutagenic or nonalerting carcinogens and noncarcinogens, the fragment model demonstrated a concordance of near 50%, whereas the ligand-based models demonstrated a concordance of 71% for nonmutagenic carcinogens and 74% for nonalerting carcinogens. Overall, these findings suggest that expert system analysis of virtual chemical protein interactions may be useful for developing predictive SAR models for nonmutagenic carcinogens. Moreover, a more practical approach for developing SAR models for carcinogenesis may include fragment-based models for chemicals testing positive for mutagenicity and ligand-based models for chemicals devoid of DNA reactivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22678118      PMCID: PMC3463155          DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgs197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  32 in total

1.  Assessment of the sensitivity of the computational programs DEREK, TOPKAT, and MCASE in the prediction of the genotoxicity of pharmaceutical molecules.

Authors:  Ronald D Snyder; Greg S Pearl; George Mandakas; Wai Nang Choy; Federico Goodsaid; I Y Rosenblum
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Salmonella mutagenicity and rodent carcinogenicity: quantitative structure-activity relationships.

Authors:  B W Blake; K Enslein; V K Gombar; H H Borgstedt
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  Alternatives to using human experience in assessing health risks.

Authors:  D P Rall; M D Hogan; J E Huff; B A Schwetz; R W Tennant
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity for 44 chemicals: results.

Authors:  J Ashby; R W Tennant
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Fundamental structural alerts to potential carcinogenicity or noncarcinogenicity.

Authors:  J Ashby
Journal:  Environ Mutagen       Date:  1985

6.  Definitive relationships among chemical structure, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity for 301 chemicals tested by the U.S. NTP.

Authors:  J Ashby; R W Tennant
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Learning rules to predict rodent carcinogenicity of non-genotoxic chemicals.

Authors:  Y Lee; B G Buchanan; D M Mattison; G Klopman; H S Rosenkranz
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 8.  The influence of chemical structure on the extent and sites of carcinogenesis for 522 rodent carcinogens and 55 different human carcinogen exposures.

Authors:  J Ashby; D Paton
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 9.  Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances.

Authors:  Mark T D Cronin; Joanna S Jaworska; John D Walker; Michael H I Comber; Christopher D Watts; Andrew P Worth
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays.

Authors:  L S Gold; C B Sawyer; R Magaw; G M Backman; M de Veciana; R Levinson; N K Hooper; W R Havender; L Bernstein; R Peto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  1 in total

1.  Structure-activity relationship models for rat carcinogenesis and assessing the role mutagens play in model predictivity.

Authors:  C A Carrasquer; K Batey; S Qamar; A R Cunningham; S L Cunningham
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.000

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.