Literature DB >> 22677612

Prophylactic retention sutures in midline laparotomy in high-risk patients for wound dehiscence: a randomized controlled trial.

Zhamak Khorgami1, Saeed Shoar, Bardia Laghaie, Ali Aminian, Negin Hosseini Araghi, Ahmadreza Soroush.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abdominal wound dehiscence (WD) is a postoperative complication with high mortality and morbidity rates. Retention sutures are often used in surgical take-back for dehiscence. The aim of this study was to assess the reduced rate of dehiscence in midline laparotomy using prophylactic retention sutures in high-risk patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred high-risk patients with at least two risk factors for dehiscence who underwent midline laparotomy between 2008 and 2010 were randomly divided into two groups. In the control group, the fascia was continuously repaired using a running looped #1 nylon suture. For the intervention group, we added retention sutures that included the skin, subcutaneous tissue, rectus muscle, and abdominal fascia. We compared the rates of WD, evisceration, wound infection, postoperative pain, postdehiscence mortality, and late incisional hernia for these two groups.
RESULTS: After accounting for early mortalities, 147 patients were followed in the intervention group and 148 patients in the control group. WD occurred in 6 patients (4%) in the intervention group and 20 control patients (13.3%) (P = 0.007). Abdominal evisceration after surgery occurred in 1 patient (0.7%) with retention sutures and 4 control patients (2.7%) (P = 0.371). There was no significant difference in wound infection and incisional hernia between the two groups. Postoperative pain scores between the two groups did not differ significantly during the first 3 d, but did differ on the fourth day.
CONCLUSION: Prophylactic retention sutures reduce the occurrence of WD following midline laparotomy in high-risk patients with multiple risk factors for impaired wound healing without imposing remarkable postoperative complications.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22677612     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  14 in total

1.  A prospective evaluation of the risk factors for development of wound dehiscence and incisional hernia.

Authors:  Kerim Bora Yılmaz; Melih Akıncı; Lütfi Doğan; Niyazi Karaman; Cihangir Özaslan; Can Atalay
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2013-03-01

2.  A retrospective analysis of early and late term complications in patients who underwent application of retention sutures for gastrointestinal tract malignancies.

Authors:  Barış Bayraktar; İbrahim Ali Özemir; Julide Sağıroğlu; Gökhan Demiral; Yahya Çelik; Sinan Aslan; Ercüment Tombalak; Ahmet Yılmaz; Rafet Yiğitbaşı
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-10-20

3.  An evaluation of treatment results of emergency versus elective surgery in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Bahattin Bayar; Kerim Bora Yılmaz; Melih Akıncı; Alpaslan Şahin; Hakan Kulaçoğlu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-08-18

Review 4.  Incisional reinforcement in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Timothy F Feldmann; Monica T Young; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

5.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions.

Authors:  F E Muysoms; S A Antoniou; K Bury; G Campanelli; J Conze; D Cuccurullo; A C de Beaux; E B Deerenberg; B East; R H Fortelny; J-F Gillion; N A Henriksen; L Israelsson; A Jairam; A Jänes; J Jeekel; M López-Cano; M Miserez; S Morales-Conde; D L Sanders; M P Simons; M Śmietański; L Venclauskas; F Berrevoet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Wound Disruption Following Colorectal Operations.

Authors:  Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh; Mark H Hanna; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills; Alessio Pigazzi; Ninh T Nguyen; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  A nationwide analysis of re-operation after kidney transplant.

Authors:  Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh; Linda J Chen; Mahmoud Alameddine; Joshua S Jue; Anupam K Gupta; George Burke; Gaetano Ciancio
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Comparing the Tolerability of a Novel Wound Closure Device Using a Porcine Wound Model.

Authors:  Katy L Townsend; Jen Akeroyd; Duncan S Russell; Jamie J Kruzic; Bria L Robertson; William Lear
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Prevention of incisional hernia with a reinforced tension line (RTL) versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies: 3-year follow-up in a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  E E Lozada-Hernández; J C Mayagoitía-González; R L Smolinski-Kurek; L Montiel-Hinojosa; L Hernández-Villegas; J M Morales-Vargas; K D Pérez-Sánchez; A Orozco-Mosqueda; M Cano-Rosas
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  TGF-β expression on different suturing technique for abdominal skin wound closure in rats.

Authors:  Imam Sofii; Ratna Sari Kalembu; Aditya Rifqi Fauzi; Firdian Makrufardi; Akhmad Makhmudi
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.