Literature DB >> 22677599

Voluntary autonomous simulator based training in minimally invasive surgery, residents' compliance and reflection.

Pieter J van Empel1, Mathilde G E Verdam, Magnus Strypet, Lennart B van Rijssen, Judith A Huirne, Fedde Scheele, H Jaap Bonjer, W Jeroen Meijerink.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knot tying and suturing skills in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) differ markedly from those in open surgery. Appropriate MIS training is mandatory before implementation into practice. The Advanced Suturing Course (ASC) is a structured simulator based training course that includes a 6-week autonomous training period at home on a traditional laparoscopic box trainer. Previous research did not demonstrate a significant progress in laparoscopic skills after this training period. This study aims to identify factors determining autonomous training on a laparoscopic box trainer at home.
METHODS: Residents (n = 97) attending 1 of 7 ASC courses between January 2009 and June 2011 were consecutively included. After 6 weeks of autonomous, training a questionnaire was completed. A random subgroup of 30 residents was requested to keep a time log. All residents received an online survey after attending the ASC. We performed outcome comparison to examine the accuracy of individual responses.
RESULTS: Out of 97 residents, the main motives for noncompliant autonomous training included a lack of (training) time after working hours (n = 80, 83.3%), preferred practice time during working hours (n = 76, 31.6%), or another surgical interest than MIS (n = 79, 15.2%). Previously set training goals would encourage autonomous training according to 27.8% (n = 18) of residents. Thirty participants submitted a time log and reported an average 76.5-minute weekly training time. All residents confirmed that autonomous home practice on a laparoscopic box trainer is valuable.
CONCLUSIONS: Autonomous practice should be structured and inclusive of adequate and sufficient feedback points. A minimally required practice time should be set. An obligatory assessment, including corresponding consequence should be conducted. Compliance herewith may result in increased voluntary (autonomous) simulator based (laparoscopic) training by residents.
Copyright © 2012 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22677599     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  16 in total

1.  Homemade laparoscopic surgical simulator: a cost-effective solution to the challenge of acquiring laparoscopic skills?

Authors:  A Aslam; G J Nason; S K Giri
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Systematic instruction of arthroscopic knot tying with the ArK Trainer: an objective evaluation tool.

Authors:  Ivan H Wong; Matthew Robert Denkers; Nathan Alexander Urquhart; Forough Farrokhyar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Can a virtual reality surgical simulation training provide a self-driven and mentor-free skills learning? Investigation of the practical influence of the performance metrics from the virtual reality robotic surgery simulator on the skill learning and associated cognitive workloads.

Authors:  Gyusung I Lee; Mija R Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Learning curve on the TrEndo laparoscopic simulator compared to an expert level.

Authors:  Pieter J van Empel; Joris P Commandeur; Lennart B van Rijssen; Mathilde G E Verdam; Judith A Huirne; Fedde Scheele; H Jaap Bonjer; W Jeroen Meijerink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Off-site training of laparoscopic skills, a scoping review using a thematic analysis.

Authors:  Ebbe Thinggaard; Jakob Kleif; Flemming Bjerrum; Jeanett Strandbygaard; Ismail Gögenur; E Matthew Ritter; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Incentivising practice with take-home laparoscopic simulators in two UK Core Surgical Training programmes.

Authors:  Laura G Nicol; Kenneth G Walker; Jennifer Cleland; Roland Partridge; Susan J Moug
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2016-09-19

7.  Take-home training in a simulation-based laparoscopy course.

Authors:  Ebbe Thinggaard; Lars Konge; Flemming Bjerrum; Jeanett Strandbygaard; Ismail Gögenur; Lene Spanager
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopy training in Belgium: results from a nationwide survey, in urology, gynecology, and general surgery residents.

Authors:  Gunter De Win; Wouter Everaerts; Dirk De Ridder; Griet Peeraer
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-01-30

9.  Laparoscopic suturing learning curve in an open versus closed box trainer.

Authors:  S P Rodrigues; T Horeman; M S H Blomjous; E Hiemstra; J J van den Dobbelsteen; F W Jansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Validation of a Cognitive Task Simulation and Rehearsal Tool for Open Carpal Tunnel Release.

Authors:  John A M Paro; Anna Luan; Gordon K Lee
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2017-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.