Literature DB >> 22677329

Maxillary advancement with conventional orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate: is it a stable technique?

Humam Saltaji1, Michael P Major, Hussam Alfakir, Mohammed A Q Al-Saleh, Carlos Flores-Mir.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term skeletal stability after maxillary surgical advancement with conventional Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate by a systematic review of the published data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases, "gray literature," and reference list searches were conducted. The inclusion criteria were the stability of maxillary surgical advancement with conventional Le Fort I osteotomy fixed with plates and assessed at the post-treatment follow-up 1 year or more postoperatively in patients with cleft lip and/or palate. Full reports were retrieved from abstracts or titles that appeared to meet the inclusion criteria or lacked sufficient detail for immediate exclusion. Once full reports were collected, they were again reviewed, considering more detailed inclusion criteria for a final selection decision. A methodologic quality assessment tool was used. The quantity and quality of the obtained data precluded a meta-analytic approach.
RESULTS: A total of 25 abstracts/titles met the initial search criteria, and 10 studies were finally selected. The overall methodologic quality scores were high for only 1 randomized clinical trial. After maxillary advancement with Le Fort I in patients with cleft lip and palate, the long-term horizontal relapse at the A-point was 20% to 30% in 4 studies and 30% to 40% in 3 studies. In addition, vertical relapse was more than 50% in 4 studies. The study judged as a high-quality study reported a 37% rate of horizontal relapse and a 65% rate of vertical relapse at the A-point.
CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests maxillary surgical advancement with conventional Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate appears to show a moderate relapse rate in the horizontal plane and a high relapse rate in the vertical plane.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22677329     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  4 in total

1.  Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kloukos; Piotr Fudalej; Patrick Sequeira-Byron; Christos Katsaros
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-10

2.  Relapse after Le Fort I surgery in oral cleft patients: a 2-year follow-up using digitized and 3D models.

Authors:  Willian Saranholi da Silva; Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga de Almeida; Maria Giulia Rezende Pucciarelli; Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek; Juliana Dreyer da Silva de Menezes; Renato Yassutaka Faria Yaedú; Thais Marchini Oliveira; Flavia M R N Cintra; Simone Soares
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Three-Dimensional Outcome Assessments of Surgical Correction in Cleft and Noncleft Patients with Class III Skeletal Relation: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Te-Ju Wu; Cheng-Chun Wu; Chi-Yu Tsai; Yi-Hao Lee; Yu-Jen Chang; Shiu-Shiung Lin; Jui-Pin Lai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Orthognathic Surgery or Overlay Prosthesis: Quality of Life in Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.

Authors:  Michelly Lima Moro Alves; José Fernando Scarelli Lopes; Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga de Almeida; Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek; Thais Marchini de Oliveira; Simone Soares
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.