| Literature DB >> 22675657 |
Fathali Gholami-Orimi1, Farshad Taleshi, Pourya Biparva, Hassan Karimi-Maleh, Hadi Beitollahi, Hamid R Ebrahimi, Mohamad Shamshiri, Hasan Bagheri, Masoud Fouladgar, Ali Taherkhani.
Abstract
We propose chlorpromazine (CHP) as a new mediator for the rapid, sensitive, and highly selective voltammetric determination of homocysteine (Hcy) using multiwall carbon nanotube paste electrode (MWCNTPE). The experimental results showed that the carbon nanotube paste electrode has a highly electrocatalytic activity for the oxidation of Hcy in the presence of CHP as a mediator. Cyclic voltammetry, double potential step chronoamperometry, and square wave voltammetry (SWV) are used to investigate the suitability of CHP at the surface of MWCNTPE as a mediator for the electrocatalytic oxidation of Hcy in aqueous solutions. The kinetic parameters of the system, including electron transfer coefficient, and catalytic rate constant were also determined using the electrochemical approaches. In addition, SWV was used for quantitative analysis. SWV showed wide linear dynamic range (0.1-210.0 μM Hcy) with a detection limit of 0.08 μM Hcy. Finally, this method was also examined as a selective, simple, and precise electrochemical sensor for the determination of Hcy in real samples.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22675657 PMCID: PMC3364601 DOI: 10.1155/2012/902184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anal Methods Chem ISSN: 2090-8873 Impact factor: 2.193
Figure 1SEM image of MWCNTs.
Specification of synthesised multiwalled carbon nanotubes by chemical vapor deposition method.
| Catalyst | Co : Fe |
|---|---|
| Color | Black |
| Purity | >95% |
| Outside diameter (OD) | 70–100 nm |
| Inside diameter (ID) | 50–70 nm |
| Length | 10–50 |
| Special surface area (SSA) | 235 m2/g |
| Bulk density | 0.07 g/cm3 |
| True density | ~2.1 g/cm3 |
Scheme 1The role of chlorpromazine on the oxidation of Hcy.
Figure 2Cyclic voltammograms of (a) 400 μM CHP at the surface of MWCNTPE; (b) 400 μM CHP at the surface of CPE in the presence of 200 μM Hcy; (c) 400 μM CHP at the surface of MWCNTPE in the presence of 200 μM Hcy; (d) 200 μM Hcy at the surface of MWCNTPE; (e) MWCNTPE in the buffer solution. Conditions: 0.04 mol L−1 universal buffer (pH 4.0), scan rate of 20 mVs−1.
Figure 3Plot of Ipa versus ν 1/2 for the oxidation of 150 μM Hcy in the presence 400 μM CHP at the surface of MWCNTPE. Inset: linear sweep voltammetry of 150 μM Hcy in the presence 400 μM CHP at various scan rates as (1) 4, (2) 8, (3) 13, (4) 17, and (5) 20 mV s−1 in 0.04 M buffer solution (pH 4.0).
Figure 4Tafel plot 400 μM CHP at the surface of MWCNTPE in 0.04 mol L−1 universal buffer (pH 4.0) at a scan rate of 20 mV s−1 in the presence of 150 μM Hcy.
Figure 5(a) Chronoamperograms obtained at the MMWCNTPE in the absence (A) and in the presence of (B) 250 and (C) 500 μM Hcy in a buffer solution (pH 4.0). (b) dependence of I /I on the t 1/2 derived from the chronoamperogram data.
Comparison of the efficiency of some electrochemical methods in the determination of Hcy.
| Electrode | Methods | LOD ( | LDR ( | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon paste | HPLC with amperometric detection | 0.03 | 0.1–5 | [ |
| Glassy carbon | Amperometry | 0.06 | 0.1–60.0 | [ |
| Carbon-nanotube paste | Amperometry | 4.6 | 5.0–200.0 | [ |
| Carbon-nanotube paste | SWV | 0.08 | 0.1–210.0 | This work |
Interference study for the determination of 5.0 μmol L−1 Hcy under the optimized conditions.
| Species | Tolerance limits ( |
|---|---|
| Glucose, fructose, lactose, sucrose | 800 |
| Li+, Cl−, folic acid, histidine, alanine, phenyl alanine, methionine, glycine, methanol, ethanol, urea, SCN−, SO4 2− | 600 |
| Starch | Saturation |
| Ascorbic acid | 5 |
Concentration values obtained from the proposed and published methods for Hcy analysis in real samples.
| Sample | Added ( | Expected ( | Proposed method ( | Published method ( |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urine | — | — | Less than limit of detection | Less than limit of detection | — | — | — | — |
| 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.85 ± 0.31 | 5.42 ± 0.51 | 5.8 | 19 | 2.3 | 3.8 | |
| 5.00 | 10.00 | 10.21 ± 0.44 | 10.48 ± 0.60 | 6.2 | 19 | 2.5 | 3.8 | |
| 20.00 | 30.00 | 30.12 ± 0.25 | 30.33 ± 0.41 | 5 | 19 | 2.0 | 3.8 | |
| Serum | Less than limit of detection | Less than limit of detection | — | — | — | — | ||
| 6 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.63 ± 0.65 | 50.87 ± 0.92 | 8.6 | 19 | 3.5 | 3.8 |
| 7 | 20.00 | 70.00 | 70.55 ± 0.58 | 70.67 ± 0.75 | 7.0 | 19 | 3.0 | 3.8 |
F ex: calculated F value; reported F value from F-test table with 95% confidence level and 2/2 degree of freedom; t ex: calculated t; t tab (98%): reported t value from student's t-test table with 98% confidence level.