Literature DB >> 22675593

Complete genome sequence of Paenibacillus sp. strain JDR-2.

Virginia Chow, Guang Nong, Franz J St John, John D Rice, Ellen Dickstein, Olga Chertkov, David Bruce, Chris Detter, Thomas Brettin, James Han, Tanja Woyke, Sam Pitluck, Matt Nolan, Amrita Pati, Joel Martin, Alex Copeland, Miriam L Land, Lynne Goodwin, Jeffrey B Jones, Lonnie O Ingram, Keelnathan T Shanmugam, James F Preston.   

Abstract

Paenibacillus sp. strain JDR-2, an aggressively xylanolytic bacterium isolated from sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) wood, is able to efficiently depolymerize, assimilate and metabolize 4-O-methylglucuronoxylan, the predominant structural component of hardwood hemicelluloses. A basis for this capability was first supported by the identification of genes and characterization of encoded enzymes and has been further defined by the sequencing and annotation of the complete genome, which we describe. In addition to genes implicated in the utilization of β-1,4-xylan, genes have also been identified for the utilization of other hemicellulosic polysaccharides. The genome of Paenibacillus sp. JDR-2 contains 7,184,930 bp in a single replicon with 6,288 protein-coding and 122 RNA genes. Uniquely prominent are 874 genes encoding proteins involved in carbohydrate transport and metabolism. The prevalence and organization of these genes support a metabolic potential for bioprocessing of hemicellulose fractions derived from lignocellulosic resources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gram-positive; Paenibacillus; aerobic; mesophile; xylan; xylanolytic

Year:  2012        PMID: 22675593      PMCID: PMC3368403          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2374349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Paenibacillus sp. strain JDR-2 (Pjdr2) was isolated from wafers cut from live stems of sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua) placed in soil in an area populated predominantly by this tree species. The ability of this isolate to grow on 4-O-methylglucuronoxylose (MeGX) as the sole carbon source identified a metabolic potential not previously described. MeGX is released along with fermentable xylose during dilute acid pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Since MeGX may represent 5­ to 20% of the hemicellulose components from hardwoods and agricultural residues, this ability was of interest for increasing bioconversion yields of fermentable sugars from these resources [1,2]. Growth rates and yields of Pjdr2 with polymeric 4-O-methylglucuronoxylan (MeGXn) as substrate were much greater than with monosaccharides and oligosaccharides derived from MeGXn. These increases are presumably the result of a cell-associated multimodular GH10 endoxylanase that generates xylobiose, xylotriose, and the aldouronate, 4-O-methylglucuronoxylotriose (MeGX3), for direct assimilation and metabolism [2]. A cluster of genes was cloned and sequenced from Pjdr2 genomic DNA which contained two genes encoding transcriptional regulators, three genes encoding ABC transporters, and three sequential structural genes lacking secretion sequences encoding a GH67 α-glucuronidase, a GH10 endoxylanase catalytic domain and a putative GH43 β-xylosidase. The expression of these genes, as well as a distal gene encoding a secreted cell-associated multimodular GH10 endoxylanase, was coordinately responsive to inducers and repressors, leading to their collective designation as a xylan-utilization regulon [3]. Physiological studies defining the preferential utilization of MeGXn compared to MeGX and MeGX3 support a process in which extracellular depolymerization, assimilation and intracellular metabolism are coupled, allowing the rapid and complete utilization of MeGXn [4]. Pjdr2 was the first member of this genus to have its genome completely sequenced and made available for detailed analysis. The sequences of genomes of 2 strains of Paenibacillus polymyxa [5,6], “Paenibacillus vortex” [7], and Paenibacillus sp. Y412MC10 (NCBI NC_013406.1, unpublished results) have since been completed. The incomplete genome sequence Paenibacillus larvae subsp. larvae, the causative agent of American Foulbrood disease of honey bees, has also been analyzed [8].

Classification and features

A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method [9] for complete sequences of genes encoding 16S rRNA derived from sequenced genomes of Paenibacillus spp., along with the sequences of some members of the Bacillus spp., Microbacterium spp. and Clostridium spp, is presented in Figure 1. The sequence of the gene encoding 16S rRNA (AF355462) from Paenibacillus polymyxa PKB1 is included as representative of the type species of the genus [10].
Figure 1

Phylogenetic analysis of Paenibacillus sp. JDR-2 was performed using MEGA4 [9] with the Neighbor-Joining method (bootstrap: 2,000 replicates). The species and GenBank accession numbers are: Paenibacillus larvae subsp. pulvifaciens DSM 3615 (AB073204); Bacillus halodurans C-125 (BA000004); Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168 (AL009126); Bacillus clausii KSM-K16 (AP006627); Bacillus licheniformis DSM 13 (AE017333); Bacillus megaterium str. KL-197 (AY030338); Bacillus stearothermophilus (AB021196); Paenibacillus lentimorbus (AB110988); Paenibacillus popilliae str. ATCC14706(T), (AF071859); Paenibacillus thiaminolyticus (D78475); Paenibacillus nematophilus str. NEM1b (AF480937); Paenibacillus polymyxa (AF355463); Paenibacillus peoriae DSM 8320 (AB073186); Paenibacillus polymyxa SC2 (CP002213); Paenibacillus sp. JDR-2 (CP001656); Paenibacillus sp. Y412MC10 (CP001793); “Paenibacillus vortex” str. V453 (HQ005270); Clostridium difficile 630 (AM180355); Clostridium polysaccharolyticum DSM 1801 (X71858); Clostridium acetobutylicum DSM 1731 (X78071); Clostridium pasteurianum (M23930); Microbacterium testaceum StLB037 (AP012052); Microbacterium laevaniformans str. C820 (NR_036839); Microbacterium luteolum DSM 20143 (Y17235); Cellulosimicrobium cellulans str. ZFJ-17 (EU931556).

Phylogenetic analysis of Paenibacillus sp. JDR-2 was performed using MEGA4 [9] with the Neighbor-Joining method (bootstrap: 2,000 replicates). The species and GenBank accession numbers are: Paenibacillus larvae subsp. pulvifaciens DSM 3615 (AB073204); Bacillus halodurans C-125 (BA000004); Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168 (AL009126); Bacillus clausii KSM-K16 (AP006627); Bacillus licheniformis DSM 13 (AE017333); Bacillus megaterium str. KL-197 (AY030338); Bacillus stearothermophilus (AB021196); Paenibacillus lentimorbus (AB110988); Paenibacillus popilliae str. ATCC14706(T), (AF071859); Paenibacillus thiaminolyticus (D78475); Paenibacillus nematophilus str. NEM1b (AF480937); Paenibacillus polymyxa (AF355463); Paenibacillus peoriae DSM 8320 (AB073186); Paenibacillus polymyxa SC2 (CP002213); Paenibacillus sp. JDR-2 (CP001656); Paenibacillus sp. Y412MC10 (CP001793); “Paenibacillus vortex” str. V453 (HQ005270); Clostridium difficile 630 (AM180355); Clostridium polysaccharolyticum DSM 1801 (X71858); Clostridium acetobutylicum DSM 1731 (X78071); Clostridium pasteurianum (M23930); Microbacterium testaceum StLB037 (AP012052); Microbacterium laevaniformans str. C820 (NR_036839); Microbacterium luteolum DSM 20143 (Y17235); Cellulosimicrobium cellulans str. ZFJ-17 (EU931556). The unrooted phylogenetic tree shows Pjdr2 in a branch that includes other Paenibacillus spp. in this comparison, supporting a lineage distinct from other Gram positive endospore-forming bacteria. Pjdr2 groups more closely with Paenibacillus lentimorbus and other Paenibacillus species that are insect pathogens than it does with another group that includes type species Paenibacillus polymyxa. From the standpoint of genome size and imputed metabolic potential based on sequence, it is surprising, based on 16S sequence, that it is not more closely related to Paenibacillus sp. Y412MC10. Despite a close similarity of Paenibacillus JDR-2 to Microbacterium species with respect to membrane fatty acids (see discussion below), it is clear that it is not related to members of the genus Microbacterium on the basis of 16S rRNA sequence. When grown on oat spelt xylan agar plates [2], colonies of strain Pjdr2 are white with smooth edges, surrounded by clearing zones resulting from the depolymerization of the xylan. This property was routinely used to monitor the purity of Pjdr2 cultures. As shown in Figure 2, cells of Pjdr2 are rod shaped, with swellings suggestive of sporulation. The properties evaluated for classification allows assignment as an endospore-forming bacterium in the phylum Firmicutes and genus Paenibacillus as noted in Table 1.
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrographs of Paenibacillus sp. JDR-2. Panel (a) is representative of the bacilli harvested in the vegetative state and panel (b) indicates individuals with expanded midsections which are entering the sporulation phase. Pjdr2 cells were grown in Luria Broth and harvested by centrifugation at the exponential growth phase (a) and post exponential phase (b), the pellets washed with water 3 times and prepared for scanning electron microscopy by the Electron Microscopy and Bio-Imaging laboratory, ICBR of the University of Florida.

Table 1

Classification and general features of Paenibacillus sp. JDR-2 according to the MIGS recommendations [11].

MIGS ID     Property     Term    Evidence code
     Domain Bacteria    TAS [12]
     Phylum Firmicutes    TAS [13,14]
     Class Bacilli    TAS [15,16]
     Current classification     Order Bacillales    TAS [17,18]
     Family Paenibacillaceae    TAS [16,19]
     Genus Paenibacillus    TAS [20-24]
     Paenibacillus sp. Strain JDR-2    TAS [2]
     Gram stain     Positive    NAS
     Cell shape     Rod-shaped    NAS
     Sporulation     Spore-forming    NAS
     Temperature range     Mesophile,    TAS [2]
     Optimum temperature     30°C    TAS [2]
     Salinity
MIGS-22     Oxygen requirement     Aerobic    IDA
     Carbon source     Glucose, xylose, β-1,4-xylan, β-1,4-1,3-glucan, 4-O-methyl-glucuronoxylose    TAS [2]
     Energy source     chemoorganotrophic
MIGS-6     Habitat     Sweet Gum stem wood    TAS [2]
MIGS-15     Biotic relationship     Free living    TAS [2]
MIGS-14     Pathogenicity     Non pathogenic    NAS
     Biosafety level     1    NAS
     Isolation     Sweet Gum stem wood in soil    TAS [2]
MIGS-4     Geographic location     Florida    TAS [2]
MIGS-5     Sample collection time     2000     TAS [2]
MIGS-4.1     Latitude     29.4°    TAS
MIGS-4.2     Longitude     82.3°    TAS
MIGS-4.3     Depth     1 inch    TAS [2]
MIGS-4.4     Altitude     180 feet above msl    NAS

Evidence codes – IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [25].

Scanning electron micrographs of Paenibacillus sp. JDR-2. Panel (a) is representative of the bacilli harvested in the vegetative state and panel (b) indicates individuals with expanded midsections which are entering the sporulation phase. Pjdr2 cells were grown in Luria Broth and harvested by centrifugation at the exponential growth phase (a) and post exponential phase (b), the pellets washed with water 3 times and prepared for scanning electron microscopy by the Electron Microscopy and Bio-Imaging laboratory, ICBR of the University of Florida. Evidence codes – IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [25].

Chemotaxonomy

The fatty acid methyl esters analysis (FAME) of Pjdr2 provided an alternative approach for determination of relatedness to other bacteria. Cultures were grown to exponential phase (24 hrs) on Trypticase soy agars. Bacterial cells were harvested and extracted according to the standard MIDI protocol [26]. FAME analysis was conducted using the Sherlock Microbial Identification System 4.5 [27]. Analyses showed that the predominant fatty acid in Pjdr2 is anteiso-C15:0 (46.93%), which in addition to iso-C16:0 (23.02%) and C16:0 (13.48%), constituted >80% of the fatty acid composition of this strain. Minor fatty acids included iso-C14:0 (3.92%), C14:0 (2.35%), and iso-C15:0 (5.29%). Strains with a similarity index (SI) value of 0.5 or higher indicate a good library comparison (MIDI 2002). The two strains that most closely match the profile of Pjdr2 are Microbacterium laevaniformans (SI = 0.75) and Cellulobacterium cellulans (SI = 0.51). We have included these two species in our phylogenetic analysis based upon their 16S rRNA sequences (Figure 1). The FAME analysis provided a rapid assignment of the species by comparing the fatty acid profile(s) with 60 strains (42 species) of Bacillus, 2 strains (1 species) of Cellulobacterium, 20 strains (19 species) of Microbacterium and 20 strains (18 species) of Paenibacillus, as well as other aerobic bacteria. Sequence analysis of 16S rRNA provides the acceptable basis for considering phylogenetic relationships. Nevertheless the FAME analysis provides a convenient method with which to confirm the identity of the organism as it is maintained and studied over time.

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

For the preparation of genomic DNA, one of several colonies surrounded by a clear zone was picked from an agar plate (0.1% oat spelt xylan/ 0.1% yeast extract/ Zucker-Hankin medium [2], and grown in Zucker-Hankin/1% yeast extract at 30°C with shaking at 240 rpm. A culture (8 ml) at 0.6 OD600nm was inoculated into 48 ml of culture media (Zucker-Hankin, 1% yeast extract). The latter was grown to 0.6 OD600nm and cells were collected by centrifugation. High molecular weight DNA was prepared from these cells as per the protocol provided by JGI. Cells were suspended in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1.0 mM EDTA), pH 8.0 and treated with lysozyme to lyse the cell wall. SDS and Proteinase K were added to denature and degrade proteins. NaCl and CTAB were added to facilitate subsequent precipitation. Cell lysates were extracted with phenol and chloroform and the DNA was precipitated by addition of isopropanol. The nucleic acid pellet was washed with 70% ethanol, dissolved in water and then treated with RNase A.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of Pjdr2 was sequenced at the JGI using a combination of 8 kb and 40 kb (fosmid) DNA libraries. In addition to Sanger sequencing, 454 pyrosequencing [28] was performed to a depth of 20× coverage. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at the JGI website [29]. Draft assemblies were based on 39,689 total reads. All three libraries provided 5.1× coverage of the genome. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [30] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment [31-33]. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher [34] or transposon bombing of bridging clones (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, custom primer walk, or PCR amplification (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). A total of 1,028 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The completed sequence analysis of Pjdr2 contained 45,057 reads, achieving an average of 5.5-fold sequence coverage per base, with an error rate less than 1 in 100,000. The complete nucleotide sequence of Paenibacillus sp. strain JDR-2 and its annotation can be found online at the IMG (Integrated Microbial Genome) portal of JGI [35], as well as at the genome resource site of NCBI [36].

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [37] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by manual curation using the JGI program GenePRIMP [38]. The predicted CDSs were translated and searched with the following databases to assign a product description for each predicted protein: the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro. Non-coding genes and miscellaneous features were predicted using tRNAscan-SE [39], RNAMMer [38], Rfam [40], TMHMM [41], and SignalP [42]. Genome statistics are provided in Table 2, and a full circular map in Figure 3 below.
Table 2

Genomic Statistics

Attribute      Value     % of Total
Genome size (bp)      7,184,930     100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)      6,384,736     88.86%
DNA G+C content (bp)      3,612,449     50.28%
Number of replicons      1
Extrachromosomal elements      0
Total genes      6,410     100.00%
RNA genes      122     1.90%
rRNA genes      35     0.55%
Protein coding genes      6,288     98.10%
Pseudo Genes      75     1.17%
Genes with function prediction      4,737     73.90%
Protein coding genes with COGs      4,667     72.81%
Protein coding genes with Pfam      5,128     80.00%
Genes in paralog clusters      1,614     25.18%
Protein coding genes coding signal peptides      1,629     25.41%
Genes connected to transporter classification      1,090     17.00%
Figure 3

Circular map of the genome of Paenibacillus sp JDR-2. Labeling from the outside circle towards the inside circles: circle 1. Nucleotide numbering system; circle 2 and 3. Predicted coding sequences on the forward strand and on the reverse strand with each gene colored by its assigned COG category; circle 4. RNA genes (tRNAs in green, rRNAs in red, other RNAs in black); circle 5. GC content; circle 6. GC skew.

Circular map of the genome of Paenibacillus sp JDR-2. Labeling from the outside circle towards the inside circles: circle 1. Nucleotide numbering system; circle 2 and 3. Predicted coding sequences on the forward strand and on the reverse strand with each gene colored by its assigned COG category; circle 4. RNA genes (tRNAs in green, rRNAs in red, other RNAs in black); circle 5. GC content; circle 6. GC skew.

Insights from genome sequencing

Utilization of lignocellulosics

The nucleotide sequence of a cluster of genes which included the α-glucuronidase gene served as a marker for the sequenced genome. The sequence of this cluster was previously determined in a cosmid clone of the genomic DNA of Pjdr2. The presence of this unique contiguous sequence in a single copy without orthologs or paralogs supported the final genomic sequence as representative of a single genome from a pure culture. This aldouronate-utilization gene cluster, in conjunction with the distal gene encoding a multimodular cell-associated GH10 endoxylanase, constitutes a xylan-utilization regulon as previously defined [3]. The coordinate expression of the genes in this regulon supports a process in which assimilation of the aldouronate, 4-0-methylglucuronoxylotriose, generated by a cell-associated GH10 endoxylanase, is coupled to extracellular depolymerization, facilitating depolymerization, assimilation and metabolism as previously described [4]. The sequencing of the genome of Paenibacillus sp. strain JDR-2 has allowed further analysis of its xylan-utilization regulon and the identification of similar regulons involved in the depolymerization and utilization of soluble β-glucans. A noteworthy feature of the genome of Pjdr2 is the large number (874) of genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism and transport constituting 17% of the genome (Table 3). This characteristic contrasted with 9% and 291 genes in Bacillus subtilis subtilis 168 and 11% and 481 genes in Paenibacillus polymyxa E861. The recently completed genome Paenibacillus sp. Y412MC10, however, is quite similar to Pjdr2 and contains 16% and 828 genes in this category.
Table 3

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code    value    %age    Description
J    199    3.89    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    -    -    RNA processing and modification
K    580    11.34    Transcription
L    149    2.91    Replication, recombination and repair
B    1    0.02    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    36    0.70    Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y    -    -    Nuclear structure
V    104    2.03    Defense mechanisms
T    426    8.33    Signal transduction mechanisms
M    255    4.98    Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N    70    1.37    Cell motility
Z    1    0.02    Cytoskeleton
W    -    -    Extracellular structures
U    57    1.11    Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O    116    2.27    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    180    3.52    Energy production and conversion
G    874    17.08    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    316    6.18    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    115    2.25    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    151    2.95    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    120    2.35    Lipid transport and metabolism
P    273    5.34    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    99    1.94    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    613    11.98    General function prediction only
S    381    7.45    Function unknown
-    1,743    27.19     Not in COGs
  27 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Rfam: an RNA family database.

Authors:  Sam Griffiths-Jones; Alex Bateman; Mhairi Marshall; Ajay Khanna; Sean R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0.

Authors:  Jannick Dyrløv Bendtsen; Henrik Nielsen; Gunnar von Heijne; Søren Brunak
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities.

Authors:  B Ewing; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing.

Authors:  D Gordon; C Abajian; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Use of PCR-targeted mutagenesis to disrupt production of fusaricidin-type antifungal antibiotics in Paenibacillus polymyxa.

Authors:  Jingru Li; Perrin K Beatty; Saleh Shah; Susan E Jensen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  What is the type species of the genus Paenibacillus? Request for an opinion.

Authors:  B J Tindall
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Paenibacillus sp. strain JDR-2 and XynA1: a novel system for methylglucuronoxylan utilization.

Authors:  Franz J Stjohn; John D Rice; James F Preston
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Genome sequence of the pattern forming Paenibacillus vortex bacterium reveals potential for thriving in complex environments.

Authors:  Alexandra Sirota-Madi; Tsviya Olender; Yael Helman; Colin Ingham; Ina Brainis; Dalit Roth; Efrat Hagi; Leonid Brodsky; Dena Leshkowitz; Vladimir Galatenko; Vladimir Nikolaev; Raja C Mugasimangalam; Sharron Bransburg-Zabary; David L Gutnick; Doron Lancet; Eshel Ben-Jacob
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  The innate immune and systemic response in honey bees to a bacterial pathogen, Paenibacillus larvae.

Authors:  Queenie W T Chan; Andony P Melathopoulos; Stephen F Pernal; Leonard J Foster
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  8 in total

1.  GH51 arabinofuranosidase and its role in the methylglucuronoarabinoxylan utilization system in Paenibacillus sp. strain JDR-2.

Authors:  Neha Sawhney; James F Preston
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Transcriptomic analysis of xylan utilization systems in Paenibacillus sp. strain JDR-2.

Authors:  Neha Sawhney; Casey Crooks; Franz St John; James F Preston
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Bacterial xylan utilization regulons: systems for coupling depolymerization of methylglucuronoxylans with assimilation and metabolism.

Authors:  Virgina Chow; Guang Nong; Franz J St John; Neha Sawhney; John D Rice; James F Preston
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.258

4.  A 1,3-1,4-β-Glucan Utilization Regulon in Paenibacillus sp. Strain JDR-2.

Authors:  Virginia Chow; Young Sik Kim; Mun Su Rhee; Neha Sawhney; Franz J St John; Guang Nong; John D Rice; James F Preston
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Staphylococcus epidermidis in the human skin microbiome mediates fermentation to inhibit the growth of Propionibacterium acnes: implications of probiotics in acne vulgaris.

Authors:  Yanhan Wang; Sherwin Kuo; Muya Shu; Jinghua Yu; Stephen Huang; Ashley Dai; Aimee Two; Richard L Gallo; Chun-Ming Huang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Comparative genomic analysis of N2-fixing and non-N2-fixing Paenibacillus spp.: organization, evolution and expression of the nitrogen fixation genes.

Authors:  Jian-Bo Xie; Zhenglin Du; Lanqing Bai; Changfu Tian; Yunzhi Zhang; Jiu-Yan Xie; Tianshu Wang; Xiaomeng Liu; Xi Chen; Qi Cheng; Sanfeng Chen; Jilun Li
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of carbohydrate utilization by Paenibacillus sp. JDR-2: systems for bioprocessing plant polysaccharides.

Authors:  Neha Sawhney; Casey Crooks; Virginia Chow; James F Preston; Franz J St John
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Genomic comparison of sporeforming bacilli isolated from milk.

Authors:  Andrea I Moreno Switt; Alexis D Andrus; Matthew L Ranieri; Renato H Orsi; Reid Ivy; Henk C den Bakker; Nicole H Martin; Martin Wiedmann; Kathryn J Boor
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.969

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.