| Literature DB >> 22675510 |
Timothy Lahey1, Mimi Ghosh, John V Fahey, Zheng Shen, Lucy R Mukura, Yan Song, Susan Cu-Uvin, Kenneth H Mayer, Peter F Wright, John C Kappes, Christina Ochsenbauer, Charles R Wira.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated intrinsic anti-HIV activity in cervicovaginal lavage (CVL) from HIV-infected women with high CD4 counts and not on antiretroviral therapy. However, the impact of HIV disease progression on CVL innate immune responses has not been delineated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22675510 PMCID: PMC3366961 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Broad and highly variable anti-HIV-1 activity of cervicovaginal lavage fluid from 57 HIV-infected women against multiple R5 and X4 strains of HIV-1, including transmitted/founder viruses.
Bars depict median, interquartile range and 95% confidence intervals. Negative values indicate enhancement of infection.
Figure 2HIV disease progression exerts a selective impact on anti-HIV activity of cervicovaginal lavage fluid.
HIV disease progression to CD4 counts <200 was associated with significant reductions in anti-HIV activity against the R5-tropic virus BaL (A) but not Yu2.c (B), on one of two X4 tropic viruses IIIB and NL4.3 (C &D), and against both transmitted/founder (T/F) viruses CH058.c or CH077.c (E & F). Negative anti-HIV activity values indicate enhancement of infection. Bars depict median, interquartile range and 95% confidence intervals; P values derived via Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Figure 3Inhibition by cervicovaginal lavage of T/F virus RPHA.c derived from a woman who reported heterosexual intercourse as her risk for contracting HIV.
(A) There was no statistically significant difference between median values of inhibition of RPHA.c comparing women with and without HIV infection. (B) Among HIV-infected women, HIV disease progression stage modulated the inhibitory effect of cervicovaginal lavage fluid on RPHA.c. Negative anti-HIV activity values indicate enhancement of infection. Bars depict median, interquartile range and 95% confidence intervals; P values via (A) Mann-Whitney U test and (B) Kruskal-Wallis test.
Correlations between CD4 count, peripheral HIV viral load and cervicovaginal HIV viral load with anti-HIV activity of cervicovaginal lavage from HIV-infected women.
| Viruses tested for anti-HIV activity | CD4 count | Peripheral HIV viral load | Cervicovaginal lavage HIV viral load | |||||
| Viral Tropism | Virus | N | Spearman ρ | P value | Spearman ρ | P value | Spearman ρ | P value |
| R5 | BaL | 57 | 0.647 | <0.001 | −0.347 | 0.009 | −0.178 | 0.189 |
| Yu2.c | 56 | 0.230 | 0.088 | −0.074 | 0.591 | 0.028 | 0.839 | |
| X4 | IIIB | 57 | 0.549 | <0.001 | −0.313 | 0.019 | −0.134 | 0.326 |
| NL4-3 | 45 | 0.120 | 0.433 | −0.262 | 0.085 | 0.251 | 0.101 | |
| (T/F) | CH058.c | 51 | 0.245 | 0.083 | −0.033 | 0.823 | −0.052 | 0.718 |
| Ch077.c | 56 | −0.087 | 0.523 | 0.059 | 0.670 | 0.153 | 0.266 | |
| RHPA.c | 47 | 0.021 | 0.888 | −0.130 | 0.389 | 0.043 | 0.778 | |
CVL levels of the laboratory-adapted HIV viruses IIIB and BaL correlated positively with CD4 count and negatively with the peripheral HIV viral load. By contrast, there were no significant correlations of CVL HIV viral load with anti-HIV activity against any virus.
Correlations between CD4 count, peripheral HIV viral load and cervicovaginal lavage HIV viral load with the levels of putative anti-HIV microbicides in the cervicovaginal lavage of HIV-infected women.
| CD4 count | Peripheral HIV viral load | Cervicovaginal lavage HIV viral load | |||||
| Putative anti-HIV microbicide (pg/ml) | N | Spearman ρ | P value | Spearman ρ | P value | Spearman ρ | P value |
|
| 56 | 0.046 | 0.732 | −0.003 | 0.984 | 0.226 | 0.094 |
|
| 56 | −0.685 | <0.001 | 0.233 | 0.084 | 0.336 | 0.011 |
|
| 56 | 0.232 | 0.082 | −0.128 | 0.347 | −0.012 | 0.931 |
|
| 56 | −0.572 | <0.001 | 0.279 | 0.037 | 0.326 | 0.014 |
|
| 51 | 0.140 | 0.321 | −0.046 | 0.749 | 0.248 | 0.080 |
|
| 41 | 0.215 | 0.177 | −0.035 | 0.829 | 0.174 | 0.283 |
|
| 40 | −0.036 | 0.826 | 0.035 | 0.835 | 0.088 | 0.595 |
CVL levels of the putative endogenous anti-HIV microbicides Elafin and SLPI correlated negatively with the CD4 count, and positively with the CVL HIV viral load. By contrast, the peripheral HIV viral load correlated positively only with CVL levels of SLPI and anti-HIV gp160 IgG.
HBD2, human beta defensin 2; Ig, immunoglobulin G; SLPI, secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor.
Figure 4HIV disease progression exerts a selective impact on putative anti-HIV microbicides in cervicovaginal lavage fluid.
(A) CVL levels of human beta defensin 2 (HBD2) were significantly lower among women with CD4<200 cells/µl. (B) CVL levels of Elafin were significantly higher among women with CD4<200 cells/µl. (C) There was a trend toward lower CVL levels of macrophage inflammatory protein-3 alpha (MIP-3α) among women with CD4<200 cells/µl. (D) CVL levels of secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor were higher among women with CD4<200 cells/µl. Bars depict median, interquartile range and 95% confidence intervals; P values derived via Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Analysis of associations between the levels of cytokines and chemokines (CK/CC) with anti-HIV activity of the cervicovaginal lavage (CVL) from HIV-infected women against the indicated viral strains.
| Cytokine/chemokine | IIIB | NL4.3 | Yu2.c | BaL | CH077.c | CH058.c | RHPA.c |
| IL-1α | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| IL-1RA | 0.374, 0.008 | 0.414, 0.007 | 0.463, <0.001 | NS | 0.390, 0.005 | 0.566, <0.001 | NS* |
| IL-6 | 0.438, 0.002 | NS | 0.433, 0.002 | 0.511, <0.001 | NS | 0.524, <0.001 | NS |
| IL-8 | NS | 0.498, <0.001 | NS | 0.376, 0.007 | 0.365, 0.009 | 0.405, 0.004 | NS |
| IP-10 | 0.606, <0.001 | NS | 0.502, <0.001 | 0.463, <0.001 | NS | 0.631, <0.001 | 0.524, 0.007 |
| MCP-1 (CCL2) | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | 0.393, 0.005 | NS |
| MIP-1α (CCL3) | 0.560, <0.001 | NS | 0.538, <0.001 | 0.524, <0.001 | NS | 0.501, <0.001 | NS |
| MIP-1β (CCL4) | 0.448, 0.001 | 0.411, 0.007 | 0.387, 0.006 | 0.444, 0.001 | NS | 0.438, 0.002 | NS |
| TNF-α | 0.475, <0.001 | 0.543, <0.001 | 0.496, <0.001 | 0.397, 0.004 | NS | 0.457, <0.001 | NS |
| GM-CSF | NS* | NS | NS* | NS | NS | NS* | NS |
| G-CSF | 0.456, <0.001* | NS | NS | 0.526, <0.001* | NS | 0.420, 0.002 | NS |
| RANTES (CCL5) | 0.556, <0.001* | NS | 0.501, <0.001* | 0.549, <0.001* | NS | 0.563, <0.001* | NS |
| Eotaxin | 0.548, <0.001 | NS | 0.456, <0.001 | 0.419, 0.003 | NS | 0.458, <0.001 | NS |
| Fractalkine (CX3CL1) | 0.495, <0.001 | 0.488, 0.001 | 0.545, <0.001 | 0.454, <0.001 | 0.367, 0.009 | 0.537, <0.001 | NS |
Numbers in cells indicate r value for Spearman correlation and P value, unless P value for correlation is >0.01 in which case correlation is listed as not significant (NS). *Significance of correlation altered by adjustment for GTVL (see text for details).