Literature DB >> 22675138

Deceptive vibratory communication: pupae of a beetle exploit the freeze response of larvae to protect themselves.

Wataru Kojima1, Yukio Ishikawa, Takuma Takanashi.   

Abstract

It is argued that animal signals may have evolved so as to manipulate the response of receivers in a way that increases the fitness of the signallers. In deceptive communication, receivers incur costs by responding to false signals. Recently, we reported that pupae of the soil-inhabiting Japanese rhinoceros beetle Trypoxylus dichotoma produce vibratory signals to deter burrowing larvae, thereby protecting themselves. In the present study, monitoring of vibrations associated with larval movement revealed that T. dichotoma larvae remained motionless for ca 10 min when pupal vibratory signals were played back transiently (freeze response). Furthermore, pupal signals of T. dichotoma elicited a freeze response in three other scarabaeid species, whose pupae do not produce vibratory signals. This indicates that the freeze response to certain types of vibration evolved before the divergence of these species and has been evolutionarily conserved, presumably because of the fitness advantage in avoiding predators. Pupae of T. dichotoma have probably exploited pre-existing anti-predator responses of conspecific larvae to protect themselves by emitting deceptive vibratory signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22675138      PMCID: PMC3440991          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  7 in total

1.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection.

Authors:  J A Endler; A L Basolo
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Resolving current disagreements and ambiguities in the terminology of animal communication.

Authors:  G D Ruxton; H M Schaefer
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  PERSPECTIVE: CHASE-AWAY SEXUAL SELECTION: ANTAGONISTIC SEDUCTION VERSUS RESISTANCE.

Authors:  Brett Holland; William R Rice
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Eavesdropping on insects hidden in soil and interior structures of plants.

Authors:  R W Mankin; J Brandhorst-Hubbard; K L Flanders; M Zhang; R L Crocker; S L Lapointe; C W McCoy; J R Fisher; D K Weaver
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Pupal vibratory signals of a group-living beetle that deter larvae: Are they mimics of predator cues?

Authors:  Wataru Kojima; Yukio Ishikawa; Takuma Takanashi
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2012-05-01

6.  Worm grunting, fiddling, and charming--humans unknowingly mimic a predator to harvest bait.

Authors:  Kenneth C Catania
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Rodents in open space adjust their behavioral response to the different risk levels during barn-owl attack.

Authors:  Shahaf Edut; David Eilam
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 2.964

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Substrate vibrations mediate behavioral responses via femoral chordotonal organs in a cerambycid beetle.

Authors:  Takuma Takanashi; Midori Fukaya; Kiyoshi Nakamuta; Niels Skals; Hiroshi Nishino
Journal:  Zoological Lett       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.836

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.