BACKGROUND: Management of abdominal abscesses (AA) in Crohn's disease (CD) always includes antibiotics, and some type of drainage is added according to the response and other considerations. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of different therapeutic approaches to spontaneous AA in CD. METHODS: All cases of AA in CD were identified from the databases of five university hospitals. Postoperative cases were excluded. Therapeutic success was defined as abscess resolution and nonreappearance within 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: We identified 128 cases in 2236 patients (cumulative incidence 5.7%). Initial therapy included medical therapy with antibiotics alone (42.2%), antibiotics plus percutaneous drainage (23.4%), and antibiotics plus surgical drainage (34.4%). The highest final efficacy corresponded to surgery (91%) as compared with antibiotic therapy alone (63%) or percutaneous drainage (30%). Failure of initial therapy was predicted by immunomodulators at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 8.45; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-61.5; P = 0.03), fistula detectable in imaging techniques (OR 5.43; 95% CI 1.18-24.8; P = 0.02), and abscess size (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.07-2.54; P = 0.02) only for patients treated with antibiotic therapy alone. Percutaneous drainage was associated with 19% of complications (enterocutaneous fistulas 13%); surgery was associated with 13% of postoperative complications (enterocutaneous fistulas 7.7%). Following abscess resolution, 60% of patients were started on thiopurines, 9% on biologics, and in 31% baseline therapy was not modified. CONCLUSIONS: Management of spontaneous AA in CD with antibiotics alone seems to be a good option for small abscesses, especially those without associated fistula and appearing in immunomodulator-naïve patients. Surgery offers better results in the remaining clinical settings, although percutaneous drainage can avoid operative treatment in some cases.
BACKGROUND: Management of abdominal abscesses (AA) in Crohn's disease (CD) always includes antibiotics, and some type of drainage is added according to the response and other considerations. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of different therapeutic approaches to spontaneous AA in CD. METHODS: All cases of AA in CD were identified from the databases of five university hospitals. Postoperative cases were excluded. Therapeutic success was defined as abscess resolution and nonreappearance within 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: We identified 128 cases in 2236 patients (cumulative incidence 5.7%). Initial therapy included medical therapy with antibiotics alone (42.2%), antibiotics plus percutaneous drainage (23.4%), and antibiotics plus surgical drainage (34.4%). The highest final efficacy corresponded to surgery (91%) as compared with antibiotic therapy alone (63%) or percutaneous drainage (30%). Failure of initial therapy was predicted by immunomodulators at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 8.45; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-61.5; P = 0.03), fistula detectable in imaging techniques (OR 5.43; 95% CI 1.18-24.8; P = 0.02), and abscess size (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.07-2.54; P = 0.02) only for patients treated with antibiotic therapy alone. Percutaneous drainage was associated with 19% of complications (enterocutaneous fistulas 13%); surgery was associated with 13% of postoperative complications (enterocutaneous fistulas 7.7%). Following abscess resolution, 60% of patients were started on thiopurines, 9% on biologics, and in 31% baseline therapy was not modified. CONCLUSIONS: Management of spontaneous AA in CD with antibiotics alone seems to be a good option for small abscesses, especially those without associated fistula and appearing in immunomodulator-naïve patients. Surgery offers better results in the remaining clinical settings, although percutaneous drainage can avoid operative treatment in some cases.
Authors: Balakrishnan S Ramakrishna; Govind K Makharia; Vineet Ahuja; Uday C Ghoshal; Venkataraman Jayanthi; Benjamin Perakath; Philip Abraham; Deepak K Bhasin; Shobna J Bhatia; Gourdas Choudhuri; Sunil Dadhich; Devendra Desai; Bhaba Dev Goswami; Sanjeev K Issar; Ajay K Jain; Rakesh Kochhar; Goundappa Loganathan; Sri Prakash Misra; C Ganesh Pai; Sujoy Pal; Mathew Philip; Anna Pulimood; Amarender S Puri; Gautam Ray; Shivaram P Singh; Ajit Sood; Venkatraman Subramanian Journal: Indian J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-03-14
Authors: Daniel Perl; Akbar K Waljee; Shrinivas Bishu; Peter D R Higgins; Ashish P Wasnik; Ryan W Stidham Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Kamal V Patel; Amir A Darakhshan; Nyree Griffin; Andrew B Williams; Jeremy D Sanderson; Peter M Irving Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Brad D Constant; Edwin F de Zoeten; Jason P Weinman; Lindsey Albenberg; Frank I Scott Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 3.487
Authors: James Wt Toh; Peter Stewart; Matthew Jfx Rickard; Rupert Leong; Nelson Wang; Christopher J Young Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 5.742