Literature DB >> 22674801

Predictors of recall certainty of dates of analgesic medication use in pregnancy.

Rose G Radin1, Allen A Mitchell, Martha M Werler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recalled dates of medication use are difficult to validate, particularly for over-the-counter (OTC) medications. We evaluated mothers' recall certainty as an approximation of the accuracy of their recalled exposures.
METHODS: We used data from the Slone Epidemiology Center Birth Defects Study collected by retrospective interview of women about pregnancy medication use. For each medication reported, women were asked to report the dates of their use and how certain they were of their reported dates. For this analysis, 32,107 reports from 14,577 analgesic users were categorized as "high" or "low" recall certainty if they considered a reported date as exact or estimated, respectively. Patterns of analgesic use, maternal demographics, and health behaviors were explored as predictors of high recall certainty of dates of analgesic use. We used log-binomial regression with the generalized estimating equations extension to account for multiple reports per subject in estimating prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: Relative to episodes of short-term routine use (≥4 times/week for ≤30 days), high recall certainty was more likely for episodes of a single dose (prescription PR = 1.92 (1.61, 2.27); OTC PR = 3.65 (3.03, 4.40)) and less likely for episodes of occasional use (prescription PR = 0.10 (0.05, 0.18); OTC PR = 0.65 (0.53, 0.79)). The association of chronic routine use with high recall certainty was inverse among prescription analgesics and positive among OTC analgesics (prescription PR = 0.56 (0.40, 0.80); OTC PR = 2.46 (1.92, 3.42)).
CONCLUSIONS: Some characteristics that were associated with recall accuracy in previous studies were also associated with recall certainty in this study.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22674801      PMCID: PMC3443548          DOI: 10.1002/pds.3300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  21 in total

Review 1.  Toward a psychology of memory accuracy.

Authors:  A Koriat; M Goldsmith; A Pansky
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting.

Authors:  Morris Goldsmith; Asher Koriat; Amit Weinberg-Eliezer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-03

3.  Selecting accurate statements from the cognitive interview using confidence ratings.

Authors:  Wayne T Roberts; Philip A Higham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2002-03

4.  Agreement between patient self-report and a Veterans Affairs national pharmacy database for identifying recent exposures to antibiotics.

Authors:  Joshua P Metlay; Christine Hardy; Brian L Strom
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Drug certainty-response in interview-based studies.

Authors:  Wai-Ping Yau; Kueiyu Joshua Lin; Martha M Werler; Carol Louik; Allen A Mitchell; Sonia Hernández-Díaz
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.890

6.  The retrospective measurement of prenatal and perinatal events: accuracy of maternal recall.

Authors:  Stephen L Buka; Jill M Goldstein; Eleni Spartos; Ming T Tsuang
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Agreement between interview information and physician records on history of menopausal estrogen use.

Authors:  M T Goodman; A M Nomura; L R Wilkens; L N Kolonel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Determinants of recall and recall bias in studying drug and chemical exposure in pregnancy.

Authors:  Y Feldman; G Koren; K Mattice; H Shear; E Pellegrini; S M MacLeod
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1989-07

9.  Effect of questionnaire design on recall of drug exposure in pregnancy.

Authors:  A A Mitchell; L B Cottler; S Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Birth defects related to bendectin use in pregnancy. I. Oral clefts and cardiac defects.

Authors:  A A Mitchell; L Rosenberg; S Shapiro; D Slone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-06-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  4 in total

1.  Association between antibiotic use among pregnant women with urinary tract infections in the first trimester and birth defects, National Birth Defects Prevention Study 1997 to 2011.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Ailes; Suzanne M Gilboa; Simerpal K Gill; Cheryl S Broussard; Krista S Crider; Robert J Berry; Tonia C Carter; Charlotte A Hobbs; Julia D Interrante; Jennita Reefhuis
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2016-11

2.  Validation of maternal recall of early pregnancy medication exposure using prospective diary data.

Authors:  Alexandra C Sundermann; Katherine E Hartmann; Sarah H Jones; Eric S Torstenson; Digna R Velez Edwards
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Medication use during pregnancy, gestational age and date of delivery: agreement between maternal self-reports and health database information in a cohort.

Authors:  Federica Edith Pisa; Anica Casetta; Elena Clagnan; Elisa Michelesio; Liza Vecchi Brumatti; Fabio Barbone
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Hypnotics use in children 0-18 months: moderate agreement between mother-reported survey data and prescription registry data.

Authors:  Ingvild Holdø; Jørgen G Bramness; Marte Handal; Leila Torgersen; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud; Eivind Ystrøm; Hedvig Nordeng; Svetlana Skurtveit
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2017-09-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.