Literature DB >> 22674609

Do images influence assessment in anatomy? Exploring the effect of images on item difficulty and item discrimination.

Marc A T M Vorstenbosch1, Tim P F M Klaassen, Jan G M Kooloos, Sanneke M Bolhuis, Roland F J M Laan.   

Abstract

Anatomists often use images in assessments and examinations. This study aims to investigate the influence of different types of images on item difficulty and item discrimination in written assessments. A total of 210 of 460 students volunteered for an extra assessment in a gross anatomy course. This assessment contained 39 test items grouped in seven themes. The answer format alternated per theme and was either a labeled image or an answer list, resulting in two versions containing both images and answer lists. Subjects were randomly assigned to one version. Answer formats were compared through item scores. Both examinations had similar overall difficulty and reliability. Two cross-sectional images resulted in greater item difficulty and item discrimination, compared to an answer list. A schematic image of fetal circulation led to decreased item difficulty and item discrimination. Three images showed variable effects. These results show that effects on assessment scores are dependent on the type of image used. Results from the two cross-sectional images suggest an extra ability is being tested. Data from a scheme of fetal circulation suggest a cueing effect. Variable effects from other images indicate that a context-dependent interaction takes place with the content of questions. The conclusion is that item difficulty and item discrimination can be affected when images are used instead of answer lists; thus, the use of images as a response format has potential implications for the validity of test items.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Anatomists.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22674609     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  6 in total

1.  Stereopsis, Visuospatial Ability, and Virtual Reality in Anatomy Learning.

Authors:  Jan-Maarten Luursema; Marc Vorstenbosch; Jan Kooloos
Journal:  Anat Res Int       Date:  2017-06-01

2.  Evaluating the effectiveness of integrating radiological and cross-sectional anatomy in first-year medical students - A randomized, crossover study.

Authors:  R Rajprasath; V Dinesh Kumar; Magi Murugan; Bhavani Prasad Goriparthi; Rema Devi
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2020-01-30

3.  The Benefits of an Augmented Reality Magic Mirror System for Integrated Radiology Teaching in Gross Anatomy.

Authors:  Felix Bork; Leonard Stratmann; Stefan Enssle; Ulrich Eck; Nassir Navab; Jens Waschke; Daniela Kugelmann
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Implications of introducing case based radiological images in anatomy on teaching, learning and assessment of medical students: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Ramya Rathan; Hossam Hamdy; Salah Eldin Kassab; Miral Nagy F Salama; Anusha Sreejith; Aji Gopakumar
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.263

5.  Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.

Authors:  Jane Holland; Robin O'Sullivan; Richard Arnett
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Illustrated versus non-illustrated anatomical test items in anatomy course tests and German Medical Licensing examinations (M1).

Authors:  Olaf Bahlmann
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2018-05-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.