Literature DB >> 22674561

An eight-year study of online lecture use in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course.

Gary L Nieder1, Nicole J Borges.   

Abstract

Online lectures have been used in lieu of live lectures in our gross anatomy and embryology course for the past eight years. We examined patterns of online lecture use by our students and related that use to academic entry measures, gender and examination performance. Detailed access records identified by student were available from server logs. Total views per page of lecture material increased over the first six years, then decreased markedly between years seven and eight, possibly due to the recent availability of alternate forms of lecture audio. Lecture use peaked in midafternoon and again in the evening, although some use was seen at all hours. Usage was highest at midweek and lowest on Fridays as might be expected. Individual student's use varied widely from rates equivalent to less than one viewing/page to more than three viewings per page. Overall use by male students was greater than that of females and gender-specific differences in the daily pattern were seen. Lecture use was correlated to the Medical College Admission Test(®) (MCAT(®)) Verbal Reasoning and Physical Sciences scores but not to composite MCAT scores or undergraduate grade point average. Overall use appeared to be driven by scheduled team-based learning (TBL) sessions and major examinations. Specific subsets of lecture material were most often viewed before related TBL sessions and again during review for examinations. A small but significant correlation between lecture use and examination and course performance was seen, specifically in the male student population. These findings, along with earlier observations, suggest that varied use of online lectures is attributable to multiple factors.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Anatomists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22674561     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  6 in total

Review 1.  Teaching medical anatomy: what is the role of imaging today?

Authors:  Bruno Grignon; Guillaume Oldrini; Frédéric Walter
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  What Are We Looking for in Computer-Based Learning Interventions in Medical Education? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tiago Taveira-Gomes; Patrícia Ferreira; Isabel Taveira-Gomes; Milton Severo; Maria Amélia Ferreira
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Rethinking gross anatomy in a compressed time frame: Clinical symptoms, not case studies, as the basis for introductory instruction.

Authors:  Sasha N Zill
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.414

4.  An analysis of anatomy education before and during Covid-19: August-December 2020.

Authors:  Stefanie M Attardi; Derek J Harmon; Malli Barremkala; Danielle C Bentley; Kirsten M Brown; Jennifer F Dennis; Haviva M Goldman; Kelly M Harrell; Barbie A Klein; Christopher J Ramnanan; Gary J Farkas
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 6.652

5.  Assessment of the effectiveness of BOPPPS-based hybrid teaching model in physiology education.

Authors:  Xiao-Yu Liu; Chunmei Lu; Hui Zhu; Xiaoran Wang; Shuwei Jia; Ying Zhang; Haixia Wen; Yu-Feng Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  In-Person or Online? The Effect of Delivery Mode on Team-Based Learning of Clinical Reasoning in a Family Medicine Clerkship.

Authors:  Oksana Babenko; Mao Ding; Ann S Lee
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.