Literature DB >> 22673271

Late reconstruction of posterior acetabular wall fractures using iliac crest.

Guo-Chun Zha1, Jun-Ying Sun, Lian Chen, Hong-Ming Zheng, Qiang Wang, Ye Jin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reconstructing late posterior acetabular wall fractures is challenging. This study evaluates the use of the iliac crest strut graft for posterior acetabular wall reconstruction.
METHODS: From 1990 to 2004, seven patients (five males and two females) with traumatic posterior acetabular wall defects were reconstructed using autogenous iliac crest strut grafts. The mean age of the patients was 31 years. The mean time from injury to reconstruction was 6.4 months. The clinical (modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score) and radiologic evaluation (Matta score) were recorded at the final follow-up.
RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 76 months. On the basis of the modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel scoring system, the clinical outcomes at final follow-up were as follows: excellent for a pediatric patient; good for three adult patients without posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the hip at the time of reconstruction; and poor for three other adult patients with posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the hip at the time of reconstruction. Radiologic grading at the final follow-up was good in the pediatric patient; fair in three adult patients without posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the hip; and poor in three other patients with posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the hip.
CONCLUSIONS: The reconstruction of the posterior acetabular wall defects using an iliac crest strut graft is a noteworthy technique for late posterior acetabular wall fracture. The technique may be an option for pediatric patients or adults without posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the hip at the time of reconstruction. However, it is not recommended for adult patients with posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the hip. In this case, total hip arthroplasty is a better choice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22673271     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318248bdef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  6 in total

Review 1.  Management of neglected acetabular fractures.

Authors:  L A Veerappa; S K Tripathy; R K Sen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Influence of age on results following surgery for displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Guo-Chun Zha; Xue-Mei Yang; Shuo Feng; Xiang-Yang Chen; Kai-Jin Guo; Jun-Ying Sun
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Modified trapdoor procedures using autogenous tricortical iliac graft without preserving the broken cartilage for treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a prospective cohort study with historical controls.

Authors:  Qi Cheng; Feng-Chao Zhao; Shi-Zhuang Xu; Li Zheng; Xin Zheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Massive heterotopic ossification associated with late deficits in posterior wall of acetabulum after failed acetabular fracture operation.

Authors:  Yuntong Zhang; Yang Xie; Shuogui Xu; Chuncai Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Biomechanical Analysis of the Fixation System for T-Shaped Acetabular Fracture.

Authors:  Yanping Fan; Jianyin Lei; Feng Zhu; Zhiqiang Li; Weiyi Chen; Ximing Liu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  Use of tricortical iliac crest strut autograft in comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures: A case series.

Authors:  Sandeep Gupta; Naveen Mittal; Jagandeep Singh Virk
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2017-11-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.