Literature DB >> 22673242

Risk factors for central line-associated bloodstream infections in the era of best practice.

Matthew E Lissauer1, Surbhi Leekha, Michael Anne Preas, Kerri A Thom, Steven B Johnson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Best clinical practice aims to eliminate central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs). However, CLABSIs still occur. This study's aim was to identify risk factors for CLABSI in the era of best practice.
METHODS: Critically ill surgical patients admitted over 2 years to the intensive care unit (ICU) for ≥ 4 days were studied. Patients with CLABSI as cause for ICU admission were excluded. Patients who developed CLABSI (National Healthcare Safety Network definition) were compared with those who did not. Hand hygiene, maximal sterile barriers, chlorhexidine scrub, avoidance of femoral vein, and proper maintenance were emphasized. Variables collected included demographics, diagnosis, and severity of illness using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV database and the hospital central data repository.
RESULTS: Of 961 patients studied, 51 patients (5.2%) developed 59 CLABSIs. Mean time from ICU admission to CLABSI was 26 days ± 26 days. The CLABSI group was more likely to be male (odds ratio [OR] 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-3.68), more critically ill on ICU admission (APACHE IV score 85.2 ± 21.9 vs. 65.6 ± 23.2, p < 0.01), more likely admitted to the emergency surgery service (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.02-3.61), and had an association with reopening of recent laparotomy (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.10-3.94).
CONCLUSION: In the era of best practice, patients who develop CLABSI are clinically distinct from those who do not develop CLABSI. These CLABSIs may be due to deficiencies of the CLABSI definition or represent patient populations requiring enhanced prevention techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, prognostic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22673242     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824d1085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  5 in total

1.  Which Comorbid Conditions Should We Be Analyzing as Risk Factors for Healthcare-Associated Infections?

Authors:  Anthony D Harris; Lisa Pineles; Deverick Anderson; Keith F Woeltje; William E Trick; Keith S Kaye; Deborah S Yokoe; Ann-Christine Nyquist; David P Calfee; Surbhi Leekha
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  What counts? An ethnographic study of infection data reported to a patient safety program.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods; Myles Leslie; Julian Bion; Carolyn Tarrant
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Successful implementation of a unit-based quality nurse to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Kerri A Thom; Shanshan Li; Melissa Custer; Michael Anne Preas; Cindy D Rew; Christina Cafeo; Surbhi Leekha; Brian S Caffo; Thomas M Scalea; Matthew E Lissauer
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  A Central Line Care Maintenance Bundle for the Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in Non-Intensive Care Unit Settings.

Authors:  Caroline O'Neil; Kelly Ball; Helen Wood; Kathleen McMullen; Pamala Kremer; S Reza Jafarzadeh; Victoria Fraser; David Warren
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 5.  Long-term vascular access in differently resourced settings: a review of indications, devices, techniques, and complications.

Authors:  Karen Milford; Dirk von Delft; Nkululeko Majola; Sharon Cox
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 1.827

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.