Literature DB >> 22672930

Neurophysiological monitoring in adult and pediatric intensive care.

A Amantini1, R Carrai, S Lori, A Peris, A Amadori, F Pinto, A Grippo.   

Abstract

Clinical neurophysiology is both an extension of clinical examination and an integration of neuroimaging. It plays a role in diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Electroencephalography (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are the most informative neurophysiological tests. Both have a major prognostic role in the hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and traumatic brain injury (TBI). In the former the absence of bilateral cortical SEPs has an unfavorable prognostic significance of 100%, whereas bilateral normal SEPs has uncertain prognostic value. In TBI these SEP patterns have high early prognostic value for both bad and good outcome. Continuous EEG monitoring is indicated for diagnosis and treatment of non convulsive seizures and status epilepticus (NCSE), whereas SEPs are more able to indicate the occurrence of neurological deterioration. In our opinion EEG-SEP monitoring is also valuable for interpretation and management of ICP trends, contributing to optimise treatment in a single patient. The EEG seems to have the same prognostic utility in pediatric as in adult ICU. Recent reviews supported the use of SEPs in the integrated process of outcome prediction after acute brain injury in children. However differences in interpretation are needed and the issue is whether it is possible to establish an age limit over which the prediction of SEPs is similar to that in adults. There are only a few studies of seizure prevalence in pediatric ICU. The variability of frequency of NCSE in comatose children is high as in adults and, similar to the adult, remains unclear the impact on outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22672930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  8 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive Neuromonitoring: Current Utility in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Traumatic Brain Injury, and Stroke.

Authors:  Luisa Vinciguerra; Julian Bösel
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  Role of Microvascular Disruption in Brain Damage from Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Aric F Logsdon; Brandon P Lucke-Wold; Ryan C Turner; Jason D Huber; Charles L Rosen; James W Simpkins
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 9.090

3.  Prognostic value of EEG indexes for the Glasgow outcome scale of comatose patients in the acute phase.

Authors:  Luca Mesin; Paolo Costa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Noninvasive monitoring intracranial pressure - A review of available modalities.

Authors:  Marium Naveed Khan; Hussain Shallwani; Muhammad Ulusyar Khan; Muhammad Shahzad Shamim
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-04-05

5.  Continuous Electroencephalography (cEEG) Monitoring and Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Ayaz M Khawaja; Guoqiao Wang; Gary R Cutter; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-02-04

6.  Dynamic changes in peripheral blood-targeted miRNA expression profiles in patients with severe traumatic brain injury at high altitude.

Authors:  Si-Qing Ma; Xue-Xia Xu; Zong-Zhao He; Xin-Hui Li; Jun-Ming Luo
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2019-04-30

7.  From head micro-motions towards CSF dynamics and non-invasive intracranial pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Arnošt Mládek; Václav Gerla; Petr Šeba; Vladimír Kolář; Petr Skalický; Helen Whitley; Lenka Lhotská; Vladimír Beneš; Ondřej Bradáč
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Assessment of cognitive dysfunction in traumatic brain injury patients: a review.

Authors:  Huiyan Sun; Chengliang Luo; Xiping Chen; Luyang Tao
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2017-11-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.