Literature DB >> 22672749

KRAS mutation status and clinical outcome of preoperative chemoradiation with cetuximab in locally advanced rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 2 phase II trials.

Sun Young Kim1, Eun Kyung Shim, Hyun Yang Yeo, Ji Yeon Baek, Yong Sang Hong, Dae Yong Kim, Tae Won Kim, Jee Hyun Kim, Seock-Ah Im, Kyung Hae Jung, Hee Jin Chang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cetuximab-containing chemotherapy is known to be effective for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer; however, it is not clear whether cetuximab-based preoperative chemoradiation confers an additional benefit compared with chemoradiation without cetuximab in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutation status with direct sequencing and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) expression status with immunohistochemistry in tumor samples of 82 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who were enrolled in the IRIX trial (preoperative chemoradiation with irinotecan and capecitabine; n=44) or the ERBIRIX trial (preoperative chemoradiation with irinotecan and capecitabine plus cetuximab; n=38). Both trials were similarly designed except for the administration of cetuximab; radiation therapy was administered at a dose of 50.4 Gy/28 fractions and irinotecan and capecitabine were given at doses of 40 mg/m2 weekly and 1650 mg/m2/day, respectively, for 5 days per week. In the ERBIRIX trial, cetuximab was additionally given with a loading dose of 400 mg/m2 on 1 week before radiation, and 250 mg/m2 weekly thereafter.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics before chemoradiation were similar between the 2 trial cohorts. A KRAS mutation in codon 12, 13, and 61 was noted in 15 (34%) patients in the IRIX cohort and 5 (13%) in the ERBIRIX cohort (P=.028). Among 62 KRAS wild-type cancer patients, major pathologic response rate, disease-free survival and pathologic stage did not differ significantly between the 2 cohorts. No mutations were detected in BRAF exon 11 and 15, PIK3CA exon 9 and 20, or EGFR exon 18-24 in any of the 82 patients, and PTEN and EGFR expression were not predictive of clinical outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with KRAS wild-type locally advanced rectal cancer, the addition of cetuximab to the chemoradiation with irinotecan plus capecitabine regimen was not associated with improved clinical outcome compared with chemoradiation without cetuximab.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22672749     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  16 in total

1.  The status of targeted agents in the setting of neoadjuvant radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancers.

Authors:  Rob Glynne-Jones; Maher Hadaki; Mark Harrison
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-09

Review 2.  Epidermal growth factor receptor and metastatic colorectal cancer: insights into target therapies.

Authors:  Ramon Andrade de Mello; Andrea Marin Marques; António Araújo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Germline and somatic genetic predictors of pathological response in neoadjuvant settings of rectal and esophageal cancers: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L E Salnikova; D S Kolobkov
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 4.  Genetics of rectal cancer and novel therapies: primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Sebastian Mondaca; Rona Yaeger
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-11

Review 5.  EGFR targeted therapies and radiation: Optimizing efficacy by appropriate drug scheduling and patient selection.

Authors:  Kyle C Cuneo; Mukesh K Nyati; Dipankar Ray; Theodore S Lawrence
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 6.  Comprehensive molecular tumor profiling in radiation oncology: How it could be used for precision medicine.

Authors:  Iris Eke; Adeola Y Makinde; Molykutty J Aryankalayil; Mansoor M Ahmed; C Norman Coleman
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  PIK3CA Amplification Is Common in Left Side-Tubular Adenomas but Uncommon Sessile Serrated Adenomas Exclusively with KRAS Mutation.

Authors:  Hyunsu Lee; Jae-Ho Lee; Dae-Kwang Kim; In-Jang Choi; Ilseon Hwang; Yu-Na Kang; Shin Kim
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  The prognostic role of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and PTEN in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  V Eklöf; M L Wikberg; S Edin; A M Dahlin; B-A Jonsson; Å Öberg; J Rutegård; R Palmqvist
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Tumor phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase signaling and development of metastatic disease in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Anne Hansen Ree; Annette Torgunrud Kristensen; Marie Grøn Saelen; Rik de Wijn; Hege Edvardsen; Jovana Jovanovic; Torveig Weum Abrahamsen; Svein Dueland; Kjersti Flatmark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody-based therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the effect of PIK3CA mutations in KRAS wild-type patients.

Authors:  Lulu Huang; Zhenfang Liu; Donghong Deng; Aihua Tan; Ming Liao; Zengnan Mo; Xiaobo Yang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 3.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.