Puneet Kaur Kochhar1, Pranay Ghosh. 1. Double Helix Cytogenetics and Reproductive Immunology Centre, New Delhi, India. drpuneet.k20@gmail.com
Abstract
AIM: Despite known association of parental carriers of structural chromosomal rearrangements with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), the possibility of having a miscarriage due to an unbalanced chromosomal aberration remains unknown. There has been limited research on the reproductive outcome of such couples. The present study was done to report the distribution of structural chromosome rearrangements in patients experiencing RPL and to describe subsequent pregnancy outcomes in the carriers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Chromosomal analysis was performed on blood samples from 788 individuals with RPL and distribution of chromosomal anomalies was studied. In couples found to have chromosomal rearrangements, pregnancy outcomes were recorded over 2 years. In the subsequent pregnancy, cytogenetic analysis was done on amniotic fluid (obtained at 16-20 weeks), or on miscarriage specimens (in pregnancies that failed to continue). RESULTS: Chromosomal rearrangements were identified in 6.8% (54/788) cases (including 5.9% reciprocal translocations, 0.7% Robertsonian translocations, and 0.1% inversions). The risk of having a chromosomal aberration was not related to the number of previous miscarriages. Over the next 2 years, two-thirds of the 49 documented pregnancies resulted in a normal live birth, and one-third miscarried. Most miscarriages (56.2%) were euploid, two were trisomic and 12.5% had an unbalanced translocation. CONCLUSION: In couples with no other cause of RPL other than a structural chromosomal rearrangement, nearly two-thirds are likely to have a normal outcome in subsequent pregnancy. Couples with pure abortion histories carry higher risk for cytogenetic abnormality than couples with normal children in addition to abortions.
AIM: Despite known association of parental carriers of structural chromosomal rearrangements with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), the possibility of having a miscarriage due to an unbalanced chromosomal aberration remains unknown. There has been limited research on the reproductive outcome of such couples. The present study was done to report the distribution of structural chromosome rearrangements in patients experiencing RPL and to describe subsequent pregnancy outcomes in the carriers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Chromosomal analysis was performed on blood samples from 788 individuals with RPL and distribution of chromosomal anomalies was studied. In couples found to have chromosomal rearrangements, pregnancy outcomes were recorded over 2 years. In the subsequent pregnancy, cytogenetic analysis was done on amniotic fluid (obtained at 16-20 weeks), or on miscarriage specimens (in pregnancies that failed to continue). RESULTS: Chromosomal rearrangements were identified in 6.8% (54/788) cases (including 5.9% reciprocal translocations, 0.7% Robertsonian translocations, and 0.1% inversions). The risk of having a chromosomal aberration was not related to the number of previous miscarriages. Over the next 2 years, two-thirds of the 49 documented pregnancies resulted in a normal live birth, and one-third miscarried. Most miscarriages (56.2%) were euploid, two were trisomic and 12.5% had an unbalanced translocation. CONCLUSION: In couples with no other cause of RPL other than a structural chromosomal rearrangement, nearly two-thirds are likely to have a normal outcome in subsequent pregnancy. Couples with pure abortion histories carry higher risk for cytogenetic abnormality than couples with normal children in addition to abortions.
Authors: Muhammad Abu-Elmagd; Mourad Assidi; Hans-Juergen Schulten; Ashraf Dallol; Peter Pushparaj; Farid Ahmed; Stephen W Scherer; Mohammed Al-Qahtani Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: Rola F Turki; Mourad Assidi; Huda A Banni; Hanan A Zahed; Sajjad Karim; Hans-Juergen Schulten; Muhammad Abu-Elmagd; Abdulrahim A Rouzi; Osama Bajouh; Hassan S Jamal; Mohammed H Al-Qahtani; Adel M Abuzenadah Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 2.103
Authors: Hong Yan Liu; Jia Huang; Tao Li; Dong Wu; Hong Dan Wang; Yue Wang; Tao Wang; Liang Jie Guo; Qian Nan Guo; Fei Fei Huang; Rui Li Wang; Ying Tai Wang Journal: Mol Cytogenet Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 2.009