Literature DB >> 22672491

Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumours: evaluation of long-term oncological and functional outcomes in 340 patients.

Christopher Springer1, M Raschid Hoda, Harun Fajkovic, Giovannalberto Pini, Nasreldin Mohammed, Paolo Fornara, Francesco Greco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term oncological and functional outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) compared with open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for pT1 renal tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective single-centre study, 340 consecutive patients underwent LPN and OPN for localized, incidentally discovered, renal masses of <7 cm (cT1). The patients were matched for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology score, tumour side (right or left kidney) and tumour characteristics (RENAL nephrometry score). Demographic data, peri- and postoperative variables, including operating time, estimated blood loss, complications, hospital stay, renal function, histological tumour staging and grading, and metastasis rates were collected and analysed.
RESULTS: The median (SEM) operating time for LPN and OPN was 145.3 (45.4) min and 155.2 (35.6) min, respectively (P = 0.07). The median (SEM) warm ischaemia time was 11.7 (2.2) min in the LPN and 14.4 (1.9) min in the OPN group (P = 0.03). The median (SEM) RENAL nephrometry scores for LPN and OPN were 5.9 (1.6) and 6.1 (0.3), respectively (P = 0.11). During follow-up, the biochemical markers of glomerular filtration were completely normalized, showing the absence of renal injury and there was no significant difference in glomerular filtration rate between the groups, with median (SEM) rates of 79.8 (3.0) mL/min/1.72 m(2) for the LPN and 80.2 (2.7) mL/min/1.72 m(2) for the OPN group at 5-year follow-up. The 5-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, were 94% and 91% in the LPN group, and 92% and 88% in the OPN group.
CONCLUSION: LPN and OPN provide similar long-term oncological outcomes in the therapy of T1 renal cancer. With regard to renal function, no damage to the kidney was found after LPN and OPN, with a complete normalization of renal function at the 5-year follow-up in both groups.
© 2012 The Authors BJU International © 2012 BJU International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22672491     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11280.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  23 in total

Review 1.  [Minimally invasive vs. open surgical procedures in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  J W Thüroff; F Roos
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 1-organ-sparing procedures in renal and adrenal tumors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Raouf Seyam; Mahmoud I Khalil; Mohamed H Kamel; Waleed M Altaweel; Rodney Davis; Nabil K Bissada
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Modified C index: Novel predictor of postoperative renal functional loss of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Hiroki Ito; Kazuhide Makiyama; Takashi Kawahara; Kimito Osaka; Koji Izumi; Yumiko Yokomizo; Noboru Nakaigawa; Masahiro Yao
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Surgical and Minimally Invasive Therapies for the Management of the Small Renal Mass.

Authors:  John Withington; Joana B Neves; Ravi Barod
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1a renal masses: a matched-pair comparison of 280 patients with TRIFECTA outcomes (RECORd Project).

Authors:  Andrea Minervini; Giampaolo Siena; Alessandro Antonelli; Giampaolo Bianchi; Aldo Massimo Bocciardi; Sergio Cosciani Cunico; Vincenzo Ficarra; Cristian Fiori; Ferdinando Fusco; Andrea Mari; Giuseppe Martorana; Mauro Medica; Vincenzo Mirone; Giuseppe Morgia; Francesco Porpiglia; Francesco Rocco; Bruno Rovereto; Riccardo Schiavina; Claudio Simeone; Carlo Terrone; Alessandro Volpe; Marco Carini; Sergio Serni
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Hybrid laparoendoscopic single-site surgery of upper urinary tract with the use of mini-laparoscopic instruments: cosmetic outcome and midterm oncological outcome.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Jason Kyriazis; Wissam Kamal; Francesco Porpiglia; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Evolution from laparoscopic to robotic nephron sparing surgery: a high-volume laparoscopic center experience on achieving 'trifecta' outcomes.

Authors:  Arie Carneiro; Arjun Sivaraman; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Ettore Di Trapani; Eric Barret; Francois Rozet; Marc Galiano; Facundo Uriburu Pizzaro; Steeve Doizi; Nathalie Cathala; Annick Mombet; Dominique Prapotnich; Xavier Cathelineau
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  [Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors. Time for a new standard?].

Authors:  S Bier; T Todenhöfer; S Aufderklamm; J Hennenlotter; J Mischinger; A Sim; J Böttge; S Rausch; O Halalsheh; A Stenzl; G Gakis; C Schwentner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Oncological outcomes of patients with incidental pathological T3a stage small renal cell carcinoma after partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Chunwoo Lee; Dalsan You; Sangjun Yoo; Cheryn Song; Bumsik Hong; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Costs analysis of laparoendoscopic, single-site laparoscopic and open surgery for cT1 renal masses in a European high-volume centre.

Authors:  Giovannalberto Pini; Luigi Ascalone; Francesco Greco; Nasreldin Mohammed; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.