Literature DB >> 22672199

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for definitive treatment of prostate cancer.

Ernesto R Cordeiro1, Xavier Cathelineau, Stefan Thüroff, Michael Marberger, Sebastien Crouzet, Jean J M C H de la Rosette.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Novel therapeutic methods have emerged in recent years as 'focal' treatment alternatives in which cancer foci can be eradicated and greatly reducing the associated side-effects of radical treatment. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) seems to result in a well fitted technology, which has proven short- to medium-term cancer control, with a low rate of complications comparable with those of established therapies. This is an up-to-date review of the available literature on HIFU as a definitive treatment of prostate cancer. It describes the technique in a comprehensive approach in terms of technical features, procedure, indications, and gives an overview of its historical background; finally, we present the future applications of HIFU and its development trend.
OBJECTIVES: • To provide an up-to-date review of the available literature on high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) as a definitive treatment of prostate cancer. • To present the technique in a comprehensive approach, comparing the available devices according to the existing evidence in terms of technical features, procedure, indications, and to give an overview of its historical background; and finally, to discuss future applications of HIFU and its development trend.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: • A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE via Ovid databases (January 2000 to December 2011), to identify studies on HIFU for treatment of prostate cancer. • Only English-language and human-based full manuscripts that reported on case series studies with >50 participants, patient characteristics, efficacy and safety data were included.
RESULTS: • No randomised controlled trials were identified by the literature search. We identified 31 uncontrolled studies that examined the efficacy of HIFU as primary treatment and two studies that examined the efficacy of HIFU as salvage treatment. • Most treated patients had localised prostate cancer (stage T1-T2); Gleason scores of 2-10 and mean prostate specific antigen (PSA) values of 4.6-12.7 ng/mL. The mean age range of the patients was 64.1-72 years. The mean follow-up ranged from 6.4 to 76.8 months. Negative biopsy rates ranged from 35 to 95%. PSA nadirs ranged from 0.04 to 1.8 ng/mL. The 5-year disease-free survival rates ranged from 61.2 to 95%; 7- and 8-year disease free survival rates ranged from 69 to 84%. • The most common complications associated with the HIFU procedure as the primary treatment included: urinary retention (<1-20%); urinary tract infections (1.8-47.9%); stress or urinary incontinence (<1-34.3%); and erectile dysfunction (20-81.6%). • Recto-urethral fistula was reported in <2% of patients. • Treatment-related morbidity appeared to be reduced by the combination of transurethral resection (TURP) of the prostate and HIFU.
CONCLUSIONS: • Novel therapeutic methods have emerged in recent years as 'focal' treatment alternatives, in which cancer foci could be eradicated by greatly reducing the associated side-effects of radical treatment. • HIFU seems to result in short- to medium-term cancer control, with a low rate of complications comparable with those of established therapies. • However, longer-term follow-up studies are needed to evaluate cancer-specific and overall survival. If available promising results on HIFU for definitive treatment of prostate cancer are confirmed in future prospective trials, focal therapy could start to challenge the current standard of care.
© 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22672199     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11262.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  27 in total

1.  Salvage HIFU for biopsy confirmed local prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy: Case report and literature review.

Authors:  Rebekah Rittberg; Tadeusz Kroczak; Neil Fleshner; Darrel Drachenberg
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  [Treatment of localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound].

Authors:  D Baumunk; M Schostak
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Nonthermal Ablation by Using Intravascular Oxygen Radical Generation with WST11: Dynamic Tissue Effects and Implications for Focal Therapy.

Authors:  Simon Y Kimm; Tatum V Tarin; Sébastien Monette; Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli; Daniel Gerber; Jeremy C Durack; Stephen B Solomon; Peter T Scardino; Avigdor Scherz; Jonathan Coleman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Urethral Strictures and Stenoses Caused by Prostate Therapy.

Authors:  Mang L Chen; Andres F Correa; Richard A Santucci
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

Review 5.  [Current controversies in the treatment of localized prostate cancer].

Authors:  R Bischoff; M Chaloupka; T Westhofen; T Grimm; B Schlenker; P Weinhold; D Tilki; C G Stief; A Kretschmer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review.

Authors:  H Petra Kok; Erik N K Cressman; Wim Ceelen; Christopher L Brace; Robert Ivkov; Holger Grüll; Gail Ter Haar; Peter Wust; Johannes Crezee
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 3.914

Review 7.  Follow-up modalities in focal therapy for prostate cancer: results from a Delphi consensus project.

Authors:  B G Muller; W van den Bos; M Brausi; J J Fütterer; S Ghai; P A Pinto; I V Popeneciu; T M de Reijke; C Robertson; J J M C H de la Rosette; S Scionti; B Turkbey; H Wijkstra; O Ukimura; T J Polascik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Focal magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: Initial North American experience.

Authors:  Uri Lindner; Sangeet Ghai; Paula Spensieri; Eugen Hlasny; Theodorus H Van Der Kwast; Stuart A McCluskey; Masoom A Haider; Walter Kucharczyk; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Manipulating the epigenome for the treatment of urological malignancies.

Authors:  Colm J O'Rourke; Vinicius Knabben; Eva Bolton; Diarmaid Moran; Thomas Lynch; Donal Hollywood; Antoinette S Perry
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 10.  Therapeutic Ultrasound and Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Karthik M Sundaram; Sam S Chang; David F Penson; Sandeep Arora
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.