Literature DB >> 22671861

The reliability and validity of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke.

Ayşe A Küçükdeveci1, Şehim Kutlay, Derya Yıldızlar, Derya Öztuna, Atilla H Elhan, Alan Tennant.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke have received some attention recently, mostly using classical approaches, but there is still an absence of investigation from a modern psychometric perspective. This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the WHODAS-II in stroke, using modern psychometric analysis.
METHODS: A total of 188 community-dwelling poststroke patients were recruited. Internal construct validity was assessed by Rasch analysis, reliability by internal consistency and person separation index (PSI), and external construct validity by associations with Functional Independence Measure (FIM(™)).
RESULTS: Rasch analysis indicated that total score (based upon 32 items, omitting the work-related items) was satisfactory, after adjustment for local dependency. The proposed "activities" and "participation" components also satisfied Rasch model expectations. An existing short form was problematic due to inclusion of a work-related item, but an alternative 10-item version was acceptable. Cronbach's α for the WHODAS-II, its domains and components varied between 0.83 and 0.99 and PSI between 0.70 and 0.95. External construct validity was confirmed by expected correlations with FIM(™).
CONCLUSIONS: WHODAS-II provides a reliable and valid instrument for measuring disability and components of "activities" and "participation" in stroke survivors. Various combinations of the item set may provide a range of scales to suit most research needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22671861     DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.690817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  11 in total

1.  Validation of Neuro-QoL and PROMIS Mental Health Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Persons with Huntington Disease.

Authors:  Noelle E Carlozzi; Siera Goodnight; Anna L Kratz; Julie C Stout; Michael K McCormack; Jane S Paulsen; Nicholas R Boileau; David Cella; Rebecca E Ready
Journal:  J Huntingtons Dis       Date:  2019

2.  Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD).

Authors:  Noelle E Carlozzi; Anna L Kratz; Nancy R Downing; Siera Goodnight; Jennifer A Miner; Nicholas Migliore; Jane S Paulsen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Effects of Problem-Solving Therapy and Clinical Case Management on Disability in Low-Income Older Adults.

Authors:  Patricia A Areán; Patrick J Raue; Charles McCulloch; Dora Kanellopoulos; Joanna K Seirup; Samprit Banerjee; Dimitris N Kiosses; Eleanor Dwyer; George S Alexopoulos
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.105

4.  Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in adults with spinal cord injury in Taiwan: a psychometric study.

Authors:  Tzu-Ying Chiu; Monika E Finger; Carolina S Fellinghauer; Reuben Escorpizo; Wen-Chou Chi; Tsan-Hon Liou; Chia-Feng Yen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Environmental effects on WHODAS 2.0 among patients with stroke with a focus on ICF category e120.

Authors:  Kwang-Hwa Chang; Yen-Nung Lin; Hua-Fang Liao; Chia-Feng Yen; Reuben Escorpizo; Tze-Hsun Yen; Tsan-Hon Liou
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Measuring disability and its predicting factors in a large database in Taiwan using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.

Authors:  Wen-Chou Chi; Kwang-Hwa Chang; Reuben Escorpizo; Chia-Feng Yen; Hua-Fang Liao; Feng-Hang Chang; Hung-Yi Chiou; Sue-Wen Teng; Wen-Ta Chiu; Tsan-Hon Liou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Associations between self-reported lifetime history of traumatic brain injuries and current disability assessment in a population sample of Canadian adults.

Authors:  Gabriela Ilie; Edward M Adlaf; Robert E Mann; Anca Ialomiteanu; Hayley Hamilton; Jürgen Rehm; Mark Asbridge; Michael D Cusimano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Factor Structure of an ICF-Based Measure of Activity and Participations for Adults in Taiwan's Disability Eligibility Determination System.

Authors:  Hua-Fang Liao; Chia-Feng Yen; Tzu-Ying Chiu; Wen-Chou Chi; Tsan-Hon Liou; Ben-Sheng Chang; Ting-Fang Wu; Shu-Jen Lu
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-05-13

9.  Disability, pain, and wound-specific concerns self-reported by adults at risk of limb loss: A cross-sectional study using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.

Authors:  Derek J Roberts; Sudhir K Nagpal; Alan J Forster; Timothy Brandys; Christine Murphy; Alison Jennings; Shira A Strauss; Evgeniya Vishnyakova; Julie Lawson; Daniel I McIsaac
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0).

Authors:  Lusine Vaganian; Sonja Bussmann; Maren Boecker; Michael Kusch; Hildegard Labouvie; Alexander L Gerlach; Jan C Cwik
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.