Literature DB >> 22670796

Conflict adaptation: it is not what you expect.

Wout Duthoo1, Wim Notebaert.   

Abstract

In two studies, a vocal Stroop task with eight different colours was employed in order to put two core assumptions of the original interpretation of the Gratton effect to the test. We verified whether top-down control processes can elicit conflict adaptation when episodic memory effects are controlled for and to what extent proactive adjustments driven by the subjects' expectancy for congruency level repetition contribute to this effect. Therefore, we presented Stroop stimuli without feature repetitions and investigated whether the induced expectancy manipulation of raising the amount of either congruency level repetitions or alternations in a training phase transferred to an unmanipulated test phase. Over the two experiments, a sequential modulation of the Stroop effect was found in the absence of stimulus feature repetitions, strongly confirming a share for top-down control processes in bringing about the Gratton effect. In the condition where congruency level repetitions were raised, a strong Gratton effect was found. When congruency level alternations outnumbered repetitions, the Gratton effect disappeared completely. However, this difference seemed mainly due to cumulative effects of local, dynamic, trial-to-trial control adjustments rather than expectancy-induced attentional shifting. Once the transition probability changed back to 50% in the test phase of each experiment, a similar Gratton effect was found in both conditions. Taken together, these results are best explained in terms of dynamic reactive control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22670796     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.676655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  16 in total

1.  Going, going, gone? Proactive control prevents the congruency sequence effect from rapid decay.

Authors:  W Duthoo; E L Abrahamse; S Braem; W Notebaert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07

2.  The hot-hand fallacy in cognitive control: repetition expectancy modulates the congruency sequence effect.

Authors:  Wout Duthoo; Peter Wühr; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

3.  Repetition or alternation of context influences sequential congruency effect depending on the presence of contingency.

Authors:  Nart Bedin Atalay; Asli Bahar Inan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-23

4.  Interrelation of resting state functional connectivity, striatal GABA levels, and cognitive control processes.

Authors:  Lauren Haag; Clara Quetscher; Shalmali Dharmadhikari; Ulrike Dydak; Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  When predictions take control: the effect of task predictions on task switching performance.

Authors:  Wout Duthoo; Wouter De Baene; Peter Wühr; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-08

6.  Disentangling posterror and postconflict reduction of interference.

Authors:  Liesbet Van der Borght; Senne Braem; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

7.  Experience a conflict-either consciously or not (commentary on Desender, Van Opstal, and Van den Bussche, 2014).

Authors:  Elger Abrahamse; Senne Braem
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-19

8.  Context specificity of post-error and post-conflict cognitive control adjustments.

Authors:  Sarah E Forster; Raymond Y Cho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Does conflict help or hurt cognitive control? Initial evidence for an inverted U-shape relationship between perceived task difficulty and conflict adaptation.

Authors:  Henk van Steenbergen; Guido P H Band; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-10

10.  Implicit learning of stimulus regularities increases cognitive control.

Authors:  Jiaying Zhao; Devin Karbowicz; Daniel Osherson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.