Literature DB >> 22670100

Fitness to drive in patients with brain tumours: the influence of mandatory reporting legislation on radiation oncologists in Canada.

A V Louie1, D P D'Souza, D A Palma, G S Bauman, M Lock, B Fisher, N Patil, G B Rodrigues.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Certain jurisdictions in Canada legally require that physicians report unfit drivers. Physician attitudes and patterns of practice have yet to be evaluated in Canada for patients with brain tumours.
METHODS: We conducted a survey of 97 radiation oncologists, eliciting demographics, knowledge of reporting laws, and attitudes on reporting guidelines for unfit drivers. Eight scenarios with varying disability levels were presented to determine the likelihood of a patient being reported as unfit to drive. Statistical comparisons were made using the Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: Of physicians approached, 99% responded, and 97 physicians participated. Most respondents (87%) felt that laws in their province governing the reporting of medically unfit drivers were unclear. Of the responding physicians, 23 (24%) were unable to correctly identify whether their province had mandatory reporting legislation. Physicians from provinces without mandatory reporting legislation were significantly less likely to consider reporting patients to provincial authorities (p = 0.001), and for all clinical scenarios, the likelihood of reporting significantly depended on the physician's provincial legal obligations.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of provincial legislation is of primary importance in determining whether physicians will report brain tumour patients to drivers' licensing authorities. In Canada, clear guidelines have to be developed to help in the assessment of whether brain tumour patients should drive.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canadian health system; Driving; brain tumour; guidelines

Year:  2012        PMID: 22670100      PMCID: PMC3364771          DOI: 10.3747/co.19.916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  15 in total

1.  MDs still the key to eliminating unfit drivers, jury decides.

Authors:  Charlotte Gray; Patrick Sullivan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Driving and patients with brain tumours: a postal survey of neurosurgeons, neurologists and radiation oncologists.

Authors:  Y S Chin; J Jayamohan; P Clouston; V Gebski; B Cakir
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 3.  Mandatory physician reporting of drivers with cardiac disease: ethical and practical considerations.

Authors:  Christopher S Simpson; Barry Hoffmaster; L Brent Mitchell; George J Klein
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Assessment of the cardiac patient for fitness to drive: drive subgroup executive summary.

Authors:  Chris Simpson; Paul Dorian; Anil Gupta; Robert Hamilton; Stephen Hart; Barry Hoffmaster; George Klein; Andrew Krahn; Peter Kryworuk; L Brent Mitchell; Paul Poirier; Heather Ross; Magdi Sami; Robert Sheldon; Jim Stone; Jan Surkes; F James Brennan
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 5.  In-office evaluation of medical fitness to drive: practical approaches for assessing older people.

Authors:  Frank J Molnar; Anna M Byszewski; Shawn C Marshall; Malcolm Man-Son-Hing
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Sharing the responsibility for assessing the risk of the driver with dementia.

Authors:  Mark J Rapoport; Nathan Herrmann; Frank J Molnar; Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Shawn C Marshall; Ken Shulman; Gary Naglie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  The treatment of unrelated disorders in patients with chronic medical diseases.

Authors:  D A Redelmeier; S H Tan; G L Booth
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Saskatchewan physicians' attitudes and knowledge regarding assessment of medical fitness to drive.

Authors:  S C Marshall; N Gilbert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Mandatory reporting by physicians of patients potentially unfit to drive.

Authors:  Donald A Redelmeier; Vikram Vinkatesh; Matthew B Stanbrook
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2008-02-11

10.  Family physicians' attitudes and practices regarding assessments of medical fitness to drive in older persons.

Authors:  Raymond W Jang; Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Frank J Molnar; David B Hogan; Shawn C Marshall; Julie Auger; Ian D Graham; Nicol Korner-Bitensky; George Tomlinson; Matthew E Kowgier; Gary Naglie
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  3 in total

1.  To drive or not to drive, that is still the question: current challenges in driving recommendations for patients with brain tumours.

Authors:  Ann Mansur; Alexa Desimone; Sara Vaughan; Tom A Schweizer; Sunit Das
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Multidisciplinary assessment of fitness to drive in brain tumour patients in southwestern Ontario: a grey matter.

Authors:  E Chan; A V Louie; M Hanna; G S Bauman; B J Fisher; D A Palma; G B Rodrigues; A Sathya; D P D'Souza
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Assessing fitness to drive in brain tumour patients: a grey matter of law, ethics, and medicine.

Authors:  A V Louie; E Chan; M Hanna; G S Bauman; B J Fisher; D A Palma; G B Rodrigues; A Warner; D P D'Souza
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.