Literature DB >> 22670073

Glaucoma progression detection by retinal nerve fiber layer measurement using scanning laser polarimetry: event and trend analysis.

Byung Gil Moon1, Kyung Rim Sung, Jung Woo Cho, Sung Yong Kang, Sung-Cheol Yun, Jung Hwa Na, Youngrok Lee, Michael S Kook.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of scanning laser polarimetry (SLP, GDx VCC) to measure the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in order to evaluate the progression of glaucoma.
METHODS: Test-retest measurement variability was determined in 47 glaucomatous eyes. One eye each from 152 glaucomatous patients with at least 4 years of follow-up was enrolled. Visual field (VF) loss progression was determined by both event analysis (EA, Humphrey guided progression analysis) and trend analysis (TA, linear regression analysis of the visual field index). SLP progression was defined as a reduction of RNFL exceeding the predetermined repeatability coefficient in three consecutive exams, as compared to the baseline measure (EA). The slope of RNFL thickness change over time was determined by linear regression analysis (TA).
RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes (14.5%) progressed according to the VF EA, 16 (10.5%) by VF TA, 37 (24.3%) by SLP EA and 19 (12.5%) by SLP TA. Agreement between VF and SLP progression was poor in both EA and TA (VF EA vs. SLP EA, k = 0.110; VF TA vs. SLP TA, k = 0.129). The mean (±standard deviation) progression rate of RNFL thickness as measured by SLP TA did not significantly differ between VF EA progressors and non-progressors (-0.224 ± 0.148 µm/yr vs. -0.218 ± 0.151 µm/yr, p = 0.874). SLP TA and EA showed similar levels of sensitivity when VF progression was considered as the reference standard.
CONCLUSIONS: RNFL thickness as measurement by SLP was shown to be capable of detecting glaucoma progression. Both EA and TA of SLP showed poor agreement with VF outcomes in detecting glaucoma progression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Event analysis; Glaucoma; Progression; Scanning laser polarimetry; Trend analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22670073      PMCID: PMC3364428          DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1011-8942


  23 in total

1.  Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; T A McCormick; M T Nicolela; R P LeBlanc
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-10

2.  Detecting glaucomatous progression using GDx with variable and enhanced corneal compensation using Guided Progression Analysis.

Authors:  Dilraj S Grewal; Mitra Sehi; David S Greenfield
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Intraobserver reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using scanning laser polarimetry and optical coherence tomography in normal and ocular hypertensive subjects.

Authors:  A Lleó-Pérez; A Ortuño-Soto; M S Rahhal; F Martínez-Soriano; J A Sanchis-Gimeno
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.597

4.  Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss.

Authors:  A Sommer; J Katz; H A Quigley; N R Miller; A L Robin; R C Richter; K A Witt
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-01

5.  Detection of glaucoma progression with stratus OCT retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Luciana M Alencar; Christopher Bowd; Pamela A Sample; Remo Susanna; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a study on optical coherence tomography guided progression analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Kai-shun Leung; Carol Yim Lui Cheung; Robert N Weinreb; Kunliang Qiu; Shu Liu; Haitao Li; Guihua Xu; Ning Fan; Chi Pui Pang; Kwok Kay Tse; Dennis Shun Chiu Lam
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma.

Authors:  T G Zeyen; J Caprioli
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-01

8.  Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial.

Authors:  M Cristina Leske; Anders Heijl; Mohamed Hussein; Bo Bengtsson; Leslie Hyman; Eugene Komaroff
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01

9.  An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fiber layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage.

Authors:  H A Quigley; J Katz; R J Derick; D Gilbert; A Sommer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Agreement for detecting glaucoma progression with the GDx guided progression analysis, automated perimetry, and optic disc photography.

Authors:  Luciana M Alencar; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Christopher Bowd; Gianmarco Vizzeri; Pamela A Sample; Remo Susanna; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Test-retest variability in structural parameters measured with glaucoma imaging devices.

Authors:  Makoto Araie
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Macular Ganglion Cell Layer Assessment to Detect Glaucomatous Central Visual Field Progression.

Authors:  Haein Moon; Jin Young Lee; Kyung Rim Sung; Jong Eun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-06

3.  Individualized Significance of 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure Curves for Therapeutic Decisions in Primary Chronic Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients.

Authors:  Mael Lever; Jan Darius Unterlauft; Christian Halfwassen; Nikolaos E Bechrakis; Anke Manthey; Michael R R Böhm
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.