Wubeante Yenet Ayen1, Neeraj Kumar. 1. Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali 160062, Punjab, India.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate in vivo doxorubicin-loaded (PEG)(3)-PLA nanopolymersomes (PolyDoxSome) using 7,12-dimethyl benz[α]anthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary carcinoma rat model compared to marketed formulation LipoDox™. METHODS: Sprague Dawley female rats with mean tumor volume of about 2 cm(3) were used for pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, antitumor efficacy and toxicity studies. RESULTS: This study demonstrates that PolyDoxSome has higher AUC (569 vs. 4 h*μg/mL), longer plasma circulation half life (21.9 vs. 0.49 h), decreased clearance (10.5 vs. 1579 mL/h/kg) and volume of distribution (137.7 vs. 1091 mL/kg) as compared to free doxorubicin. Tissue distribution profile showed increased doxorubicin concentration in tumor and decreased concentration in heart as compared to free doxorubicin. The toxicity studies as measured from liver function tests, cardiac enzyme assays, hematology test and body weight has demonstrated that it is better tolerated than free doxorubicin. When PolyDoxSome was compared with LipoDox™, it differs in size (171 vs. <100 nm), plasma circulation half life (22 vs. 35 h), C(max) (34 vs. 67 μg/mL), and AUC (568 vs. 2291 h*μg/mL), however PolyDoxSome was comparable on efficacy and toxicity profile of LipoDox™. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that PolyDoxSome has better in vivo profile than free doxorubicin and comparable efficacy and toxicity to LipoDox™.
PURPOSE: To evaluate in vivo doxorubicin-loaded (PEG)(3)-PLA nanopolymersomes (PolyDoxSome) using 7,12-dimethyl benz[α]anthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary carcinomarat model compared to marketed formulation LipoDox™. METHODS: Sprague Dawley female rats with mean tumor volume of about 2 cm(3) were used for pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, antitumor efficacy and toxicity studies. RESULTS: This study demonstrates that PolyDoxSome has higher AUC (569 vs. 4 h*μg/mL), longer plasma circulation half life (21.9 vs. 0.49 h), decreased clearance (10.5 vs. 1579 mL/h/kg) and volume of distribution (137.7 vs. 1091 mL/kg) as compared to free doxorubicin. Tissue distribution profile showed increased doxorubicin concentration in tumor and decreased concentration in heart as compared to free doxorubicin. The toxicity studies as measured from liver function tests, cardiac enzyme assays, hematology test and body weight has demonstrated that it is better tolerated than free doxorubicin. When PolyDoxSome was compared with LipoDox™, it differs in size (171 vs. <100 nm), plasma circulation half life (22 vs. 35 h), C(max) (34 vs. 67 μg/mL), and AUC (568 vs. 2291 h*μg/mL), however PolyDoxSome was comparable on efficacy and toxicity profile of LipoDox™. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that PolyDoxSome has better in vivo profile than free doxorubicin and comparable efficacy and toxicity to LipoDox™.
Authors: Kamal K Upadhyay; Anant N Bhatt; Anil K Mishra; Bilikere S Dwarakanath; Sanyog Jain; Christophe Schatz; Jean-François Le Meins; Abdullah Farooque; Godugu Chandraiah; Amit K Jain; Ambikanandan Misra; Sébastien Lecommandoux Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Peter J Photos; Lucie Bacakova; Bohdana Discher; Frank S Bates; Dennis E Discher Journal: J Control Release Date: 2003-07-31 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Pedro P G Guimarães; Stephanie Gaglione; Tomasz Sewastianik; Ruben D Carrasco; Robert Langer; Michael J Mitchell Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: H Zare-Zardini; A Amiri; M Shanbedi; A Taheri-Kafrani; Z Sadri; F Ghanizadeh; H Neamatzadeh; R Sheikhpour; F Keyvani Boroujeni; R Masoumi Dehshiri; A Hashemi; M M Aminorroaya; M R Dehgahnzadeh; Sh Shahriari Journal: Iran J Ped Hematol Oncol Date: 2015-12-10