Literature DB >> 22669354

CSF abnormalities can be predicted by VEP and MRI pathology in the examination of optic neuritis.

Henrik Horwitz1, Matilda Degn, Signe Modvig, Henrik B W Larsson, Benedikte Wanscher, Jette L Frederiksen.   

Abstract

Optic neuritis (ON) is linked to multiple sclerosis (MS). The presence of white matter lesions on cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predicts the risk of MS after ON with considerable accuracy. Oligoclonal bands (OCB) are present in 95 % of MS patients, and a lumbar puncture can also be valuable in the evaluation of patients with ON. We analyzed CSF findings in patients referred with ON in the context of MRI and visual evoked potential (VEP) pathology. We assessed the possible contributory role of a lumbar puncture and weigh this against disadvantages of the procedure. Between February 2003 and November 2011, 505 patients were referred by ophthalmologists to the Clinic of Optic Neuritis, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen. None had MS prior to referral. A total of 437 were included in the study, and all underwent MRI, a lumbar puncture and VEP. Patients with other organic causes of their symptoms and patients with >3 months between onset and tests were excluded. All files were reviewed retrospectively. CSF leukocytes and the IgG index were elevated in 33 and 41 %, respectively, and OCBs were detected in 61 % of patients. CSF abnormalities correlated strongly with VEP and MRI (p < 0.0001). Patients with normal VEP and MRI had a 96 % probability of a normal lumbar puncture. The contributory role of a lumbar puncture in the evaluation of ON seems negligible when patients have a normal VEP and MRI. We suggest that all patients should be evaluated with VEP and MRI before deciding on a lumbar puncture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22669354     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-012-6551-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  28 in total

1.  Visual evoked potentials standard (2004).

Authors:  J Vernon Odom; Michael Bach; Colin Barber; Mitchell Brigell; Michael F Marmor; Alma Patrizia Tormene; Graham E Holder
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  The clinical role of evoked potentials.

Authors:  P Walsh; N Kane; S Butler
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 3.  Post-dural puncture bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  Estelle Traurig Baer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla detects more lesions in acute optic neuritis than at 1.5 tesla.

Authors:  Kirsten Nielsen; Egill Rostrup; Jette L Frederiksen; Stine Knudsen; Henrik K Mathiesen; Lars G Hanson; Olaf B Paulson
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Needle type and the risk of post-lumbar puncture headache in the outpatient neurology clinic.

Authors:  Edward R Hammond; Zhuangjun Wang; Nihal Bhulani; Justin C McArthur; Michael Levy
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.181

6.  Disability and T2 MRI lesions: a 20-year follow-up of patients with relapse onset of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L K Fisniku; P A Brex; D R Altmann; K A Miszkiel; C E Benton; R Lanyon; A J Thompson; D H Miller
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 7.  Cerebrospinal fluid in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a consensus report.

Authors:  M Andersson; J Alvarez-Cermeño; G Bernardi; I Cogato; P Fredman; J Frederiksen; S Fredrikson; P Gallo; L M Grimaldi; M Grønning
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Do oligoclonal bands add information to MRI in first attacks of multiple sclerosis?

Authors:  M Tintoré; A Rovira; J Río; C Tur; R Pelayo; C Nos; N Téllez; H Perkal; M Comabella; J Sastre-Garriga; X Montalban
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  A randomized, controlled trial of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute optic neuritis. The Optic Neuritis Study Group.

Authors:  R W Beck; P A Cleary; M M Anderson; J L Keltner; W T Shults; D I Kaufman; E G Buckley; J J Corbett; M J Kupersmith; N R Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-02-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Management of acute optic neuritis.

Authors:  S J Hickman; C M Dalton; D H Miller; G T Plant
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Neuro-ophthalmology update.

Authors:  Konrad P Weber; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Frequency and immunophenotype of IL10-producing regulatory B cells in optic neuritis.

Authors:  Sara Lundqvist; Signe Modvig; Emilie A Fischer; Jette L Frederiksen; Matilda Degn
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 3.  Multiple sclerosis imaging: recent advances.

Authors:  Maria A Rocca; Roberta Messina; Massimo Filippi
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Relationship between cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for inflammation, demyelination and neurodegeneration in acute optic neuritis.

Authors:  Signe Modvig; Matilda Degn; Henrik Horwitz; Stig P Cramer; Henrik B W Larsson; Benedikte Wanscher; Finn Sellebjerg; Jette L Frederiksen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Visual Evoked Potential and Magnetic Resonance Imaging are More Effective Markers of Multiple Sclerosis Progression than Laser Polarimetry with Variable Corneal Compensation.

Authors:  Ema Kantorová; Peter Ziak; Egon Kurča; Mária Koyšová; Mária Hladká; Kamil Zeleňák; Jozef Michalik
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.