PURPOSE: To investigate the seasonal variations in myopia progression and axial elongation in Japanese children. METHODS:Ninety-two children who were enrolled in a myopia-control trial and wearingsingle vision or progressive addition lenses were included in the analyses (mean ± SD age 11.4 ± 1.7 years, mean spherical equivalent refractive error -4.40 ± 1.38 D). Refractive error and axial length were measured every 6 months for 1.5 years by non-cycloplegic autorefraction and partial coherence interferometer, respectively. Myopia progression and axial elongation for each 6-month interval were calculated by subtracting the measure at the end of the interval from that at the beginning. Seasons were classified as summer, winter or others, based on mid-day of the 6-month period between visits. RESULTS:Myopia progression was not significantly influenced by the season. After adjusting study groups (type of spectacles), years and age at the baseline, the mean (±SE) myopia progression was 0.35 ± 0.04 D for summer, 0.28 ± 0.06 D for winter and 0.38 ± 0.04 D for the others. In contrast, axial elongation was significantly influenced by the season, and the mean axial elongation was 0.137 ± 0.010 mm for summer, 0.170 ± 0.013 mm for winter and 0.163 ± 0.008 mm for the others. The seasonal variation in axial elongation, however, was smaller than that previously reported overseas. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese childrenmyopia progression did not slow in summer. Although axial elongation slightly decreased in summer, myopia progression seems to be fairly stable throughout the year.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To investigate the seasonal variations in myopia progression and axial elongation in Japanese children. METHODS: Ninety-two children who were enrolled in a myopia-control trial and wearing single vision or progressive addition lenses were included in the analyses (mean ± SD age 11.4 ± 1.7 years, mean spherical equivalent refractive error -4.40 ± 1.38 D). Refractive error and axial length were measured every 6 months for 1.5 years by non-cycloplegic autorefraction and partial coherence interferometer, respectively. Myopia progression and axial elongation for each 6-month interval were calculated by subtracting the measure at the end of the interval from that at the beginning. Seasons were classified as summer, winter or others, based on mid-day of the 6-month period between visits. RESULTS:Myopia progression was not significantly influenced by the season. After adjusting study groups (type of spectacles), years and age at the baseline, the mean (±SE) myopia progression was 0.35 ± 0.04 D for summer, 0.28 ± 0.06 D for winter and 0.38 ± 0.04 D for the others. In contrast, axial elongation was significantly influenced by the season, and the mean axial elongation was 0.137 ± 0.010 mm for summer, 0.170 ± 0.013 mm for winter and 0.163 ± 0.008 mm for the others. The seasonal variation in axial elongation, however, was smaller than that previously reported overseas. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese childrenmyopia progression did not slow in summer. Although axial elongation slightly decreased in summer, myopia progression seems to be fairly stable throughout the year.
Authors: Donald O Mutti; G Lynn Mitchell; Melvin L Moeschberger; Lisa A Jones; Karla Zadnik Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: M Dirani; L Tong; G Gazzard; X Zhang; A Chia; T L Young; K A Rose; P Mitchell; S-M Saw Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Kathryn A Rose; Ian G Morgan; Jenny Ip; Annette Kifley; Son Huynh; Wayne Smith; Paul Mitchell Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Lisa A Jones; Loraine T Sinnott; Donald O Mutti; Gladys L Mitchell; Melvin L Moeschberger; Karla Zadnik Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jeffrey J Walline; Kristina B Lindsley; S Swaroop Vedula; Susan A Cotter; Donald O Mutti; Sueko M Ng; J Daniel Twelker Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-01-13
Authors: Yin Guo; Li Juan Liu; Liang Xu; Ping Tang; Yan Yun Lv; Yi Feng; Meng Meng; Jost B Jonas Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-24 Impact factor: 3.240