Literature DB >> 22669341

[Ethic rounds in intensive care. Possible instrument for a clinical-ethical assessment in intensive care units].

N Scheffold1, A Paoli, J Gross, U Riemann, M Hennersdorf.   

Abstract

Ethical problems, such as medical end-of-life decisions or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment are viewed as an essential task in intensive care units. This article presents the ethics rounds as an instrument for evaluation of ethical problems in intensive care medicine units. The benchmarks of ethical reflection during the ethics rounds are considerations of ethical theory of principle-oriented medical ethics. Besides organizational aspects and the institutional framework, the role of the ethicist is described. The essential evaluation steps, as a basis of the ethics rounds are presented. In contrast to the clinical ethics consultation, the ethicist in the ethics rounds model is integrated as a member of the ward round team. Therefore ethical problems may be identified and analyzed very early before the conflict escalates. This preventive strategy makes the ethics rounds a helpful instrument in intensive care units.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22669341     DOI: 10.1007/s00063-012-0110-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed        ISSN: 2193-6218            Impact factor:   0.840


  8 in total

1.  Why don't physicians use ethics consultation?

Authors:  L Davies; L D Hudson
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1999

2.  Moving beyond "on the job training": preparing hospital ethics consultants for intensive care unit (ICU) rounds.

Authors:  J G Schumacher
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2001-12

Review 3.  What are the goals of ethics consultation? A consensus statement.

Authors:  J C Fletcher; M Siegler
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1996

4.  Impact of ethics consultations in the intensive care setting: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  L J Schneiderman; T Gilmer; H D Teetzel
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 5.  The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; David Wendler
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-03-13

6.  Learning a way through ethical problems: Swedish nurses' and doctors' experiences from one model of ethics rounds.

Authors:  M Svantesson; R Löfmark; H Thorsén; K Kallenberg; G Ahlström
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 7.  Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003.

Authors:  Jean Carlet; Lambertus G Thijs; Massimo Antonelli; Joan Cassell; Peter Cox; Nicholas Hill; Charles Hinds; Jorge Manuel Pimentel; Konrad Reinhart; Boyd Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lawrence J Schneiderman; Todd Gilmer; Holly D Teetzel; Daniel O Dugan; Jeffrey Blustein; Ronald Cranford; Kathleen B Briggs; Glen I Komatsu; Paula Goodman-Crews; Felicia Cohn; Ernlé W D Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  [Ethical case discussions in the intensive care unit : from testing to routine].

Authors:  B Meyer-Zehnder; U Barandun Schäfer; H Albisser Schleger; S Reiter-Theil; H Pargger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 1.041

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.