Literature DB >> 22669244

The disposition index: from individual to population approach.

Paolo Denti1, Gianna Maria Toffolo, Claudio Cobelli.   

Abstract

To correctly evaluate the glucose control system, it is crucial to account for both insulin sensitivity and secretion. The disposition index (DI) is the most widely accepted method to do so. The original paradigm (hyperbolic law) consists of the multiplicative product of indices related to insulin sensitivity and secretion, but more recently, an alternative formula has been proposed with the exponent α (power function law). Traditionally, curve-fitting approaches have been used to evaluate the DI in a population: the algorithmic implementations often introduce some critical issues, such as the assumption that one of the two indices is error free or the effects of the log transformation on the measurement errors. In this work, we review the commonly used approaches and show that they provide biased estimates. Then we propose a novel nonlinear total least square (NLTLS) approach, which does not need to use the approximations built in the previously proposed alternatives, and show its superiority. All of the traditional fit procedures, including NLTLS, account only for uncertainty affecting insulin sensitivity and secretion indices when they are estimated from noisy data. Thus, they fail when part of the observed variability is due to inherent differences in DI values between individuals. To handle this inevitable source of variability, we propose a nonlinear mixed-effects approach that describes the DI using population hyperparameters such as the population typical values and covariance matrix. On simulated data, this novel technique is much more reliable than the curve-fitting approaches, and it proves robust even when no or small population variability is present in the DI values. Applying this new approach to the analysis of real IVGTT data suggests a value of α significantly smaller than 1, supporting the importance of testing the power function law as an alternative to the simpler hyperbolic law.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22669244     DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00139.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0193-1849            Impact factor:   4.310


  10 in total

1.  Model-Based Quantification of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1-Induced Potentiation of Insulin Secretion in Response to a Mixed Meal Challenge.

Authors:  Chiara Dalla Man; Francesco Micheletto; Matheni Sathananthan; Adrian Vella; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Modeling changes in glucose and glycerol rates of appearance when true basal rates of appearance cannot be readily determined.

Authors:  Laura Pyle; Bryan C Bergman; Kristen J Nadeau; Melanie Cree-Green
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.310

Review 3.  Assessment of insulin action on carbohydrate metabolism: physiological and non-physiological methods.

Authors:  S Dube; I Errazuriz; C Cobelli; R Basu; A Basu
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  TCF7L2 Genotype and α-Cell Function in Humans Without Diabetes.

Authors:  Meera Shah; Ron T Varghese; John M Miles; Francesca Piccinini; Chiara Dalla Man; Claudio Cobelli; Kent R Bailey; Robert A Rizza; Adrian Vella
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 9.461

5.  Relationship between insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion rate: not necessarily hyperbolic.

Authors:  S H Kim; A Silvers; J Viren; G M Reaven
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 4.359

6.  Development and assessment of the disposition index based on the oral glucose tolerance test in subjects with different glycaemic status.

Authors:  J L Santos; I Yévenes; L R Cataldo; M Morales; J Galgani; C Arancibia; J Vega; P Olmos; M Flores; J P Valderas; F Pollak
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.158

7.  The linearized disposition index augments understanding of treatment effects in diabetes.

Authors:  Amanda J Kile; Clarissa Hanna; Tamara S Hannon; M Sue Kirkman; Robert V Considine; Yash Patel; Kieren J Mather
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.310

8.  Measuring β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity in youth: does the hyperglycemic clamp suffice?

Authors:  Lindsey Sjaarda; SoJung Lee; Hala Tfayli; Fida Bacha; Marnie Bertolet; Silva Arslanian
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Minimal and Maximal Models to Quantitate Glucose Metabolism: Tools to Measure, to Simulate and to Run in Silico Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Claudio Cobelli; Chiara Dalla Man
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-25

Review 10.  The oral minimal model method.

Authors:  Claudio Cobelli; Chiara Dalla Man; Gianna Toffolo; Rita Basu; Adrian Vella; Robert Rizza
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.461

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.