Literature DB >> 22668998

Retrospective review of the reduction of oral pressure ulcers in mechanically ventilated patients: a change in practice.

Sunniva Zaratkiewicz1, Christopher Teegardin, JoAnne D Whitney.   

Abstract

Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPU) are a growing concern in patient care. Mucosal pressure ulcers (PUs) on the lips, mouth, gums, and tongue caused by oral intubation and their securement devices can be difficult to identify and prevent. In an effort to address this problem and reduce mucosal PU, implementation of an alternative securement device, the Hollister ETAD endotracheal (ET) tube securing device, in conjunction with the B&B Medical Universal Bite Block, was introduced at our institution, a level 1 trauma and burn center, in July 2007. The ETAD was later replaced by the Hollister AnchorFast ET tube securing device in December 2007. By April 2009, they became the standard devices and method used to secure oral ET tubes. We hypothesized the use of the new securement devices and bite block would lead to a decrease of HAPUs on the lips, mouth, gums, and tongue of orally intubated critical care patients because these allow for better oral assessment and ET tube manipulation to redistribute pressure. Using data collected from our electronic medical record and our HAPU incidence tracking system, we analyzed the number of PUs on the lips, mouth, gums, and tongue of orally intubated patients in our preintervention (phase 1) group compared with the data from our postintervention (phases 2 and 3) groups. A clinically significant decrease in the reported incidence of HAPUs on the lips, mouth, gums, and tongue was noted in our phases 2 and 3 groups following introduction of the ETAD, AnchorFast, and Universal Bite Block in our institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22668998     DOI: 10.1097/CNQ.0b013e3182542de3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Nurs Q        ISSN: 0887-9303


  7 in total

Review 1.  Use of wound dressings to enhance prevention of pressure ulcers caused by medical devices.

Authors:  Joyce Black; Paulo Alves; Christopher Tod Brindle; Carol Dealey; Nick Santamaria; Evan Call; Michael Clark
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Cephalic tetanus as a differential diagnosis of facial nerve palsy.

Authors:  Yuki Kotani; Kenji Kubo; Satoko Otsu; Toshihide Tsujimoto
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-01-20

3.  Identifying and Managing a Malpositioned Endotracheal Tube Bite Block in an Orotracheally Intubated Patient: A Case Report.

Authors:  Hui-Ling Chou; Sheng-Yuan Ruan; Huey-Dong Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Janna S Landsperger; Jesse M Byram; Bradley D Lloyd; Todd W Rice
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  The impact of two distinct endotracheal tube fixation on the formation of pressure ulcer in the intensive care unit: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Alev Genc; Tulin Yildiz
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.099

6.  Impact of the introduction of an endotracheal tube attachment device on the incidence and severity of oral pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jaye Hampson; Cameron Green; Joanne Stewart; Lauren Armitstead; Gemma Degan; Andrea Aubrey; Eldho Paul; Ravindranath Tiruvoipati
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2018-02-08

7.  Systematic review: Incidence and prevalence of mucous membrane pressure injury in adults admitted to acute hospital settings.

Authors:  Paul Fulbrook; Josephine Lovegrove; Sandra Miles; Ban Isaqi
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.315

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.