Carl Morrow1, Alison Munro, Marisa Wilke, Ruth Stark, Robin Wood. 1. Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town. carl.morrow@hiv-research.org.za
Abstract
AIMS: We describe a monitoring system at population level of patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) using centrally collected laboratory data. We demonstrate an analogous process of remote sensing using a large set of laboratory results and illustrate the tremendous density of information stored. We moved from an individual to a community view of ART rollout, similar to remote sensing used in the earth and biological sciences when the spatial scale of the investigation is too large to be performed at ground level. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients from January 2004 to June 2011. A total of 188 759 individual laboratory results representing 26 445 patients were analysed for average CD4 and viral load by year. RESULTS: The data showed an increasing state of health of the population and allowed for hypothesis generation when the trends did not follow expected paths. CONCLUSION: In this analysis we moved away from individual-centred data to population-level data in order to assess ART programme performance. Routine patient-monitoring data had great utility in assessment of population health. These methods are useful in monitoring and evaluation and effectiveness studies as they are easy to collect, reliable (not requiring much human matching or interventions) and scalable from a single clinic to an entire population. The larger the sample size, the more reliable the results, as confounders (such as incorrectly identified transfers out, lost-to-follow-up patients and transfers in) would be removed.
AIMS: We describe a monitoring system at population level of patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) using centrally collected laboratory data. We demonstrate an analogous process of remote sensing using a large set of laboratory results and illustrate the tremendous density of information stored. We moved from an individual to a community view of ART rollout, similar to remote sensing used in the earth and biological sciences when the spatial scale of the investigation is too large to be performed at ground level. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients from January 2004 to June 2011. A total of 188 759 individual laboratory results representing 26 445 patients were analysed for average CD4 and viral load by year. RESULTS: The data showed an increasing state of health of the population and allowed for hypothesis generation when the trends did not follow expected paths. CONCLUSION: In this analysis we moved away from individual-centred data to population-level data in order to assess ART programme performance. Routine patient-monitoring data had great utility in assessment of population health. These methods are useful in monitoring and evaluation and effectiveness studies as they are easy to collect, reliable (not requiring much human matching or interventions) and scalable from a single clinic to an entire population. The larger the sample size, the more reliable the results, as confounders (such as incorrectly identified transfers out, lost-to-follow-up patients and transfers in) would be removed.
Authors: Anthony D Harries; Patrick Gomani; Roger Teck; Olga Ascurra de Teck; Edwin Bakali; Rony Zachariah; Edwin Libamba; Andrina Mwansambo; Felix Salaniponi; Rex Mpazanje Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: David Coetzee; Katherine Hilderbrand; Andrew Boulle; Beverley Draper; Fareed Abdullah; Eric Goemaere Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Moupali Das; Priscilla Lee Chu; Glenn-Milo Santos; Susan Scheer; Eric Vittinghoff; Willi McFarland; Grant N Colfax Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rishikesh P Dalal; Catherine Macphail; Mmabatho Mqhayi; Jeff Wing; Charles Feldman; Matthew F Chersich; Willem D F Venter Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2008-01-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Madhuri R Thakar; Philip R Abraham; Sunil Arora; Pachamuthu Balakrishnan; Bhaswati Bandyopadhyay; Ameeta A Joshi; K Rekha Devi; Ravi Vasanthapuram; Madhu Vajpayee; Anita Desai; Janardhanan Mohanakrishnan; Kanwar Narain; Krishnangshu Ray; Shilpa S Patil; Ravinder Singh; Anuj Singla; Ramesh S Paranjape Journal: AIDS Res Ther Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 2.250
Authors: Michael D April; Robin Wood; Bethany K Berkowitz; A David Paltiel; Xavier Anglaret; Elena Losina; Kenneth A Freedberg; Rochelle P Walensky Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 5.226